Okay, I don’t want Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. However, I’m not willing for it to be due to an unnamed person. If you’re challenging the character of someone nominated for the Court, you need to step forward. If not, shut you mouth.
If you’re confused, this is tired Jane Mayer latching onto Ronan Farrow for THE NEW YORKER:
The woman, who has asked not to be identified, first approached Democratic lawmakers in July, shortly after Trump nominated Kavanaugh. The allegation dates back to the early nineteen-eighties, when Kavanaugh was a high-school student at Georgetown Preparatory School, in Bethesda, Maryland, and the woman attended a nearby high school. In the letter, the woman alleged that, during an encounter at a party, Kavanaugh held her down, and that he attempted to force himself on her. She claimed in the letter that Kavanaugh and a classmate of his, both of whom had been drinking, turned up music that was playing in the room to conceal the sound of her protests, and that Kavanaugh covered her mouth with his hand. She was able to free herself. Although the alleged incident took place decades ago and the three individuals involved were minors, the woman said that the memory had been a source of ongoing distress for her, and that she had sought psychological treatment as a result.
In a statement, Kavanaugh said, “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”
To be honest, I don’t doubt that he did it. But if he did, the person needs to step forward. This is a seat on the Supreme Court – a lifetime appointment, sadly. If he tried to assault or rape you, you need to publicly come forward. And I don’t have any sympathy for your privacy here. It happened over 30 years ago? You should be able to talk about it publicly. This is now a civic duty and privacy does not apply.
If the woman does not want to go public, then none of the information should factor into the decision. If she’s not going to go public, true or false, her accusation no longer matters.
Some people won’t believe her? Yeah, that happens every time a woman tells the truth. So what? We are the least vilifying of women that we’ve ever been. She made the accusation, if she wants to back it up, she needs to go public. Otherwise, it just doesn’t matter.
Closing with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
#Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said that he is not going to hold on to power, as Iraq moves closer to forming a new government
Talk about moment passed, ship has sailed. THE WASHINGTON POST and REUTERS have both reported earlier this week that Hayder al-Abadi did not have the support needed for a second term as prime minister. Did the news only just reach him?
Dropping back to yesterday's snapshot:
Hayder's had four years (after being installed by Barack Obama) and he's accomplished nothing.
In a desperate bid to be seen as doing something, his office Tweeted the following this morning:
The @IraqiGovt is implementing wide-ranging reforms to Iraq’s electricity sector to end outages and provide reliable and efficient power to homes businesses across the country
Of Hayder's above announcement, MIDDLE EAST EYE notes:
The end is near for Haider al-Abadi, Iraq's U.S.-friendly leader
He had four years to deliver something, anything. And he failed. Four years with nothing to point to with pride. He did not put an end to ISIS. He did not put an end to corruption. Yes, Mosul is liberated or 'liberated' from ISIS but it took him three years in office to get serious about that.
Iraq shares a border with Saudi Arabia, so let's note this.
Riots? Peaceful protests is what they were until the protesters were repeatedly attacked and killed. The editorial notes:
Hayder followed Nouri al-Maliki. There was no better rotation available. Nouri encouraged the boos and hisses. Being better than Nouri wouldn't be that difficult but Hayder was so lousy that even in comparison to Nouri he could't stand out.
May 12th, Iraq voted. That's four months ago. There is still no government. In 2010, Iraq voted in March and didn't get around to forming a government until November. Over eight months.
Whether on the streets of Basra or elsewhere, Iraq does not want more of the same. AL-MONITOR notes:
The office of Iraq's top Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, issued a statement Sept. 10 calling for selecting a new prime minister who is competent and courageous to run a country plagued by rampant corruption and a weak state system.
The statement said, “The [Shiite] authority told the various [political] parties … that it will not support any new prime minister chosen from the politicians who have been in power in the past years, whether he was affiliated with a party or independent." The statement claimed that "most of the people have lost hope in any of these figures to achieve the desired improvement of the situation and to fight corruption.” It continued, “If a new figure endowed with competence, integrity, courage and firmness is chosen, it would be possible to communicate with the new prime minister on the country’s best interests, otherwise the authority would maintain its approach of boycotting the country's government officials.”
Sistani's statement came in response to claims by some politicians that the latter had proposed several candidates for the office of prime minister and refused the nomination of others. Mohammed al-Ghabban, former interior minister and a leader of the Fatah-affiliated Badr Organization, said Sept. 10 that the religious authority had intervened to find an alliance between the Fatah Alliance, which includes a number of factions of the Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) close to Iran, and the Sairoon Alliance. Ghabban noted that the events in Basra and the poor performance of the government in dealing with this crisis and its repercussions undermined the Reform and Construction Coalition between Abadi and Sadr. “This has led to new alignments, convergences and understandings between Fatah and Sairoon under the guidance of the Shiite authority,” he said.
Again, it's now been four months since the elections and still no government formed. In fairness, we probably shouldn't present it as Iraq being unable to form a government. In 2010, the US government was responsible. They backed Nouri al-Maliki who refused to step down and Barack Obama had the US broker The Erbil Agreement that gave Nouri his second term. The US government is always involved in this.
And though the US press plays coy and dumb, others don't feel the need.
From THE ECONOMIST today:
Inside the Green Zone, Baghdad’s government enclave, Brett McGurk, America’s regional envoy, and Qassem Suleimani, commander of the Quds Force, Iran’s foreign legion, are marshalling their allies.
Each is trying to shape the formation of a ruling coalition to his taste, following Iraq’s messy general election in May. Iran wants a “Shia house”—comprising more than 200 of the parliament’s 329 members drawn from a range of Shia parties—to run the show. Mr McGurk wants to have the reins held by a cross-sectarian coalition of Kurds and Sunni Arabs led by Shia “nationalists” less beholden to Iran. Mr McGurk’s would-be coalition, called Islah (“Reform”), has some 145 seats. General Suleimani’s rival bloc, known as al-Bina (“Reconstruction”), has 109 or so. Neither has the majority required to choose a president and prime minister.
While the issue of the next prime minister remains a question, the position of Speaker of Parliament may be filled. ANADOLU AGENCY reports:
The National Axis, a Sunni-leaning parliamentary bloc, has nominated Mohamed al-Halbusi for the post of speaker of Iraq’s recently-elected parliament.
In a statement, National Axis spokesman Laith al-Deleimi said the bloc had chosen its “sole nominee” for the post, which, under Iraq’s constitution (promulgated after the 2003 U.S. invasion), is reserved for a Sunni Muslim.
But already there are claims that al-Halbusi will not fill the slot.
REUTERS correspondent Raya Jalabi offers:
Both Iran and the US have been trying to shape the next government in Iraq. But the rising Fatih-Sadr coalition shouldn't be read as a sure victory for Iran. Rather, it + #Basra protests (where Iranian consulate was burned down) mark a shift inwards for Iraq's political leaders.
Analyst Duaa Malik offers:
شنو؟ خراب يلفك.
ايقنت اليوم ان لا احد يشعر بمعانات البصرة الا من شرب من ماء شط العرب. رد العراقيين اليوم لي كان مخزي وعار على من ينادي بوحدة البلد. اي بلد واي وطن تحاربني من اجله وانت تقول أنتم، اهل البصرة، "تتظلمون". فلوس البصرة وخيراتها ماكسرت عينكم من واجهتوني؟ صدق الگال: فوگ شينه گوات عينه.
Earlier today, Pope Francis spoke to the Catholic Charitable Organizations. Lydia O'Kane (VATICAN RADIO) reports, "The Pope’s address to the Catholic Charitable Organizations on Friday offered encouragement and appreciation for the work that they do in Syria, Iraq and neighbouring countries, but it was also a speech in which the Pontiff made a forceful appeal to the international community asking them 'not to neglect the many needs of the victims of this crisis, and above all to set aside special interests in order to be at the service of peace, and to bring an end to war'."
The following community sites updated: