Search results
- One of the more bizarre tidbits in this NYT story: that Epstein wanted his head and his penis frozen. https://nyti.ms/2Ki92W9
- "Mr. Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/business/jeffrey-epstein-eugenics.html …
- this is the same kind of crazy as elon musk who we pretend is a genius cause he has money https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/business/jeffrey-epstein-eugenics.html …
- In which a bunch of semi-famous male academics try to distance themselves from a man whose company/connections/money/gatherings they somehow kept finding themselves adjacent to. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/business/jeffrey-epstein-eugenics.html …
- TONIGHT: Jeffrey Epstein’s sperm ranch: another disturbing detail in the financier’s sex ring saga, and the worst salad dressing ever. pic.twitter.com/XEGN2vgB0o
Yes, the pedophile and convicted felon did think he'd make a 'special' group of people by spreading his sperm around and, yes, he did want to freeze his penis.
And we've been following the fallout from the Universal Music Group fire. Kevin Reed (WSWS) covers it:
As reported by the Times, among the more than 800 artists whose master tapes were destroyed in the fire are: Chuck Berry, The Andrews Sisters, Howlin’ Wolf, Louis Armstrong, Joan Baez, The Eagles, R.E.M., The Who, Joni Mitchell, Charles Mingus, Liza Minnelli and The Mamas and the Papas.
The Times Magazine exposé included an extensive interview with Randy Aronson, former senior director of vault operations at UMG, who witnessed the fire that destroyed Building 6197. Aronson said the vault held a massive archive of original analog tapes from post-World War II music acts and that the number of destroyed masters was “in the 175,000 range.”
The UMG memo went on: “Our data suggests that 22 of those could be ‘original masters’ which are associated with five artists. For each of those lost masters, we have located high-quality alternate sources in the form of safety copies or duplicate masters. As we complete new work and we fill in gaps of work we’ve already done, these tallies will continue to evolve by the hour.”
Kraus’s memo also said, “Of course, our work is just beginning. In the coming weeks and months we will continue to update our artists and internal teams with our progress.”
The LA Times said that the memo was distributed a few hours before the company filed a motion in US Central District Court to dismiss a class-action suit filed by a group of artists seeking damages of at least $100 million. The artists’ lawsuit is also seeking half of the 2012 undisclosed settlement reached by UMG with its landlord NBCUniversal and its insurance company for losses from the fire.
The LA Times report also said the UMG motion argues the master tapes belong to the company and not the artists, so any losses incurred are the company’s. UMG further argues that its damages settlement falls outside its licensing agreement with the artists and that, in any event, the statute of limitations has expired for any claim by the artists for relief.
A group of musicians—including the rock bands Soundgarden and Hole, singer-song writer Steve Earle, the estate of Tupac Shakur and the former wife of Tom Petty—filed their lawsuit on June 21. It accuses UMG of breach of contract by failing to properly protect the tapes. In arguing for 50 percent of the company’s damages settlement, the suit says, “even as it kept plaintiffs in the dark and misrepresented the extent of the losses, UMG successfully pursued litigation and insurance claims it was recently reported to have valued at $150 million to recoup the value of the master records.”
Closing with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Monday, August 1, 2019. In night two of the debates, War Hawk Joe Biden
stumble and bumbles along while a 'fiery' voice peters out.
Last night, the second group of Democrats took the stage in Detroit for the Democratic Party's presidential debate. The ten from last night were Tulsi Gabbard, Kirsten Gillibrand, Michael Bennet, Kirsten Gilibrand, Julian Castro, Cory Booker, Andrew Yang, Kamala Harris, Jay Inslee, Bill DeBlasio and Joe Biden.
There were two clear losers last night. No, Michael Bennet wasn't one of them. Yes, he was annoying and that included his manner of speaking which recalled Vyvyan Basterd on THE YOUNG ONES. But Michael was mainly a dud and I don't believe most thinking Americans were expecting him to perform any differently.
Before I declare the two losers -- ticking off the community with one selecting, I'm sure -- let's note the following community posts about last night's debate.
As many noted above, especially Marcia, Ruth, Betty and Rebecca, Joe Biden was the biggest loser. He was a loser for many, many reasons. He tossed aside his debate training (I spoke to a friend on the campaign) and came off pompous and entitled even when he wasn't speaking -- and he was coached on how to stand there in repose -- he tossed it aside, I was told. He stumbled while speaking repeatedly. If he was capable of an original thought, he wouldn't have been able to express it as he repeatedly mangled what he was trying to say. He was confused as to who Cory Booker was -- despite knowing him for years (Betty probably nailed the real reason for that confusion in her post) -- and he was apparently even confused as to his own website when he gave out the address in his closing statement.
Last night, the second group of Democrats took the stage in Detroit for the Democratic Party's presidential debate. The ten from last night were Tulsi Gabbard, Kirsten Gillibrand, Michael Bennet, Kirsten Gilibrand, Julian Castro, Cory Booker, Andrew Yang, Kamala Harris, Jay Inslee, Bill DeBlasio and Joe Biden.
There were two clear losers last night. No, Michael Bennet wasn't one of them. Yes, he was annoying and that included his manner of speaking which recalled Vyvyan Basterd on THE YOUNG ONES. But Michael was mainly a dud and I don't believe most thinking Americans were expecting him to perform any differently.
Before I declare the two losers -- ticking off the community with one selecting, I'm sure -- let's note the following community posts about last night's debate.
As many noted above, especially Marcia, Ruth, Betty and Rebecca, Joe Biden was the biggest loser. He was a loser for many, many reasons. He tossed aside his debate training (I spoke to a friend on the campaign) and came off pompous and entitled even when he wasn't speaking -- and he was coached on how to stand there in repose -- he tossed it aside, I was told. He stumbled while speaking repeatedly. If he was capable of an original thought, he wouldn't have been able to express it as he repeatedly mangled what he was trying to say. He was confused as to who Cory Booker was -- despite knowing him for years (Betty probably nailed the real reason for that confusion in her post) -- and he was apparently even confused as to his own website when he gave out the address in his closing statement.
BREAKING: Joe Biden just announced a run for president in 3030, I believe.
Did Joe Biden just tell us to go to Biden 3030 for this election?
did joe biden really say his website was Joe 3030? i stopped watching
Listen, I think it is ageist to say someone is too old to run for office but someone needs to tell Joe Biden that running for President in 3030 isn't going to work.
Uhhh, is this Joe Biden announcing that he's running in 3030? #DemDebate2
Joe Biden...303 -782- 3030...lol
..he was giving out his phone number but forgot it....lol
CNN: Biden tells supporters to 'go to Joe 30330' -- a website not affiliated with his campaign.
cnn.com/2019/07/31/pol…
via @GoogleNews
Either Joe Biden is a some sort of human/robot being with a 1000+ year life span playing the long game for the 3030 election or he’s forgotten what year he’s actually running. #sleepyjoe #biden3030
did Joe Biden just dementedly say "Joe 3030" instead of "Joe 2020" lol
Joe was an embarrassment and we'll probably come back to him.
But let me now break a thousand and one fantasies and tick a lot of people off.
The other big loser? Tulsi Gabbard.
Why was she on the stage?
Yes, she was rarely called on and had little time to speak. That really doesn't make a difference because when she did speak, she repeatedly blew it.
Watching her, with a group of college students, was cringe worthy. I kept my mouth shut during the debate and I waited until all the students had spoken before I shared my opinion.
The group was made up of people who were supporting Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren or Tulsi Gabbard (one young man was supporting Mike Gravel). No one was hostile towards her going into the debate.
No one was impressed with her after the debate -- not even her supporters -- one of which said that she performed like she thought Joe Biden was going to win the nomination and she was angling to be his running mate on the ticket.
She was bad.
How bad?
Jill Stein bad. In 2012, Jill ran a hideous campaign. One of the worst campaigns I've ever seen. Ava and I noted that in our day-after-the-election piece ["Let the fun begin (Ava and C.I.)"]. Marianne Williamson is ridiculed by some as a 'new age guru.' That's nonsense. She runs like a real candidate, she speaks to real issues. Jill, however, ran in 2012 like a new age guru and I found Tulsi last night to be just as vapid.
When I shared a month or so ago that I hadn't decided who I'd support (I thought that was rather obvious by the statements I'd made all along but I guess it wasn't) e-mails poured in -- to the community e-mail, not the public one, these were community members, not drive-bys to the public account -- insisting that if I was against the wars, I had to support Tulsi because she was.
Tulsi speaks a lot of beliefs that I agree with. In her interviews. In some of her speeches.
But I'm not 19. I've seen nonsense before.
And I saw it last night, repeatedly.
If people went to her website today demanding their donations back, I wouldn't be surprised at all.
She's polling slightly higher -- or was before the debate. Just a tad higher. And she needed to connect. But whomever wore that white pantsuit on stage last night -- the real Tulsi or Tulsi on ambien -- didn't connect.
With Mike Gravel and Tulsi, we're told it's important that they're on the stage in the debates because they will raise real issues. I know Mike and he will -- and did in 2008 when he was on the stage. But Tulsi didn't.
She was supposed to be the anti-war voice. She was on stage with the biggest War Hawk running for the nomination -- Joe Biden.
And she didn't touch him.
And she didn't call out the wars in any significant or meaningful manner.
And the wars were an actual issue. Moderator Jake Tapper brought the topic up and Jake went to more than just two people on this issue. We're using NBC transcript for this debate, by the way.
TAPPER: Thank you, Governor Inslee. I want to
turn to foreign policy, if we can. Senator Booker, there are about
14,000 U.S. services members in Afghanistan right now. If elected, will
they still be in Afghanistan by the end of your first year in office?
BOOKER:
Well, first of all, I want to say very clearly that I will not do
foreign policy by tweet as Donald Trump seems to do all the time. A guy
that literally tweets out that we're pulling our troops out before his
generals even know about it is creating a dangerous situation for our
troops in places like Afghanistan.
And so I
will bring our troops home and I will bring them home as quickly as
possible, but I will not set during a campaign an artificial deadline. I
will make sure we do it, we do it expeditiously, we do it safely, to
not create a vacuum that's ultimately going to destabilize the Middle
East and perhaps create the environment for terrorism and for extremism
to threaten our nation.
TAPPER: Congresswoman Gabbard, you're the only veteran on this stage. Please respond.
GABBARD:
This is real in a way that's very difficult to convey in words. I was
deployed to Iraq in 2005 during the height of the war where I served in a
field medical unit where every single day I saw the high cost of war.
Just this past week, two more of our soldiers were killed in
Afghanistan.
My cousin is deployed to
Afghanistan right now. Nearly 300 of our Hawaii National Guard soldiers
are deployed to Afghanistan, 14,000 servicemembers are deployed there.
This is not about arbitrary deadlines. This is about leadership, the
leadership I will bring to do the right thing to bring our troops home,
within the first year in office, because they shouldn't have been there
this long.
For too long, we've had leaders
who have been arbitrating foreign policy from ivory towers in Washington
without any idea about the cost and the consequence, the toll that it
takes on our servicemembers, on their families. We have to do the right
thing, end these wasteful regime change wars, and bring our troops home.
(APPLAUSE)
TAPPER: Thank you. Thank you, Congresswoman.
Mr.
Yang, Iran has now breached the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal after
President Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal, and that puts Iran
closer to building a nuclear weapon, the ability to do so, at the very
least. You've said if Iran violates the agreement, the U.S. would need
to respond, quote, "very strongly." So how would a President Yang
respond right now?
YANG: I would move to
de-escalate tensions in Iran, because they're responding to the fact
that we pulled out of this agreement. And it wasn't just us and Iran.
There were many other world powers that were part of that multinational
agreement. We'd have to try and reenter that agreement, renegotiate the
timelines, because the timelines now don't make as much sense.
But
I've signed a pledge to end the forever wars. Right now, our strength
abroad reflects our strength at home. What's happened, really? We've
fallen apart at home, so we elected Donald Trump, and now we have this
erratic and unpredictable relationship with even our longstanding
partners and allies.
What we have to do is
we have to start investing those resources to solve the problems right
here at home. We've spent trillions of dollars and lost thousands of
American lives in conflicts that have had unclear benefits. We've been
in a constant state of war for 18 years. This is not what the American
people want. I would bring the troops home, I would de-escalate tensions
with Iran, and I would start investing our resources in our own
communities.
(APPLAUSE)
TAPPER: Governor Inslee, your response?
INSLEE:
Well, I think that these are matters of great and often difficult
judgment. And there is no sort of primer for presidents to read. We have
to determine whether a potential president has adequate judgment in
these decisions.
I was only one of two
members on this panel today who were called to make a judgment about the
Iraq war. I was a relatively new member of Congress, and I made the
right judgment, because it was obvious to me that George Bush was
fanning the flames of war.
Now we face
similar situations where we recognize we have a president who would be
willing to beat the drums of war. We need a president who can stand up
against the drums of war and make rational decisions. That was the right
vote, and I believe it.
TAPPER: Thank you.
Thank you, Governor. Vice President Biden, he was obviously suggesting
that you made the wrong decision and had bad judgment when you voted to
go to war in Iraq as a U.S. senator.
BIDEN:
I did make a bad judgment, trusting the president saying he was only
doing this to get inspectors in and get the U.N. to agree to put
inspectors in. From the moment "shock and awe" started, from that
moment, I was opposed to the effort, and I was outspoken as much as
anyone at all in the Congress and the administration.
Secondly,
I was asked by the president in the first meeting we had on Iraq, he
turned and said, Joe, get our combat troops out, in front of the entire
national security team. One of the proudest moment of my life was to
stand there in Al-Faw Palace and tell everyone that we're coming -- all
our combat troops are coming home.
TAPPER: Thank you.
BIDEN: I opposed the surge in Afghanistan, this long overdue -- we should have not, in fact, gone into Afghanistan the way...
(CROSSTALK)
TAPPER: Thank you, Mr. Vice President. I want to bring in...
INSLEE: Mr. Vice President -- I'd like to comment.
That was Tulsi?
Her whole reason for being on the stage is supposed to be about ending the wars. Get Tulsi on the stage, even her detractor David Swanson has argued, because she's going to be raising the real issues.
Well not only were her remarks above inadequate and, yes, flat out embarrassing -- John Kerry could have made the same remarks in 2004 -- but she blew it.
Not just then. If it was just then, okay, she didn't think on her feet and realized a few seconds after that she should have spoken to the issues strongly.
Okay but Jay Inslee wanted to speak -- see above -- Jake instead went back to Tulsi, went back to her.
TAPPER: I would like to bring in the person on
the stage who served in Iraq, Governor -- I'm sorry, Congresswoman
Gabbard. Your response to what Vice President Biden just said.
GABBARD:
We were all lied to. This is the betrayal. This is the betrayal to the
American people, to me, to my fellow servicemembers. We were all lied
to, told that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, was
working with Al Qaida, and that this posed a threat to the American
people.
So I enlisted after 9/11 to protect
our country, to go after those who attacked us on that fateful day, who
took the lives of thousands of Americans.
The
problem is that this current president is continuing to betray us. We
were supposed to be going after Al Qaida. But over years now, not only
have we not gone after Al Qaida, who is stronger today than they were in
9/11, our president is supporting Al Qaida.
Oh, shut the f**k up, Tulsi.
Just reliving that moment is enough to piss me off.
Donald Trump is bad, Donald Trump is evil blah blah blah blah blah.
If you're honestly surprised by how Donald has been as a president, you
shouldn't be allowed to vote. Seriously, you are too damn stupid to be
trusted with a ballot. I'm opposed to Donald and I was before he
announced he was running, long, long before.
Joe Biden voted for the war, he sold the war. He lied onstage and Tulsi
safe little go to -- her bulls**t I'm-just-a-girl move -- was to talk
about Donald Trump and al Qaeda. WTF was that, you stupid idiot. I'm
furious. We've noted her here. We've reposted her Tweets on Sunday.
We've never noted much of her from her Congressional office because her
press releases are infrequent and disappointing. I think we've carried
two of her Congressional press releases.
There's a reason for that. And there's a reason that while I could
applaud her earlier statements on the war, I did buy a pass to the Tulsi
train.
She betrayed everyone last night. While I was working out this morning,
I kept telling myself to be nice when I dictated this. Sorry, that's
out the window.
Joe Biden voted for the war, he supported it. He used his position to
silence dissent. And it didn't end there, people. He knew Nouri
al-Maliki was a thug. Unlike Hillary Clinton, he didn't have the guts
to say it publicly, but he knew it. Yet he betrayed democracy and the
people of Iraq as vice president by arguing that the Iraqi people's 2010
vote didn't matter and that Nouri should have a second term even though
they voted against that.
Joe is a disaster.
Mike Gravel would have called him out.
I'm-just-a-girl-standing-on-a-stage-wanting-Joe-Biden-to-like-me was full of s**t.
Did she choke or is that the real Tulsi?
If that''s the real Tulsi, get her off stage, we don't need her. We've
had enough liars pretending that the wars were wrong and needed to be
ended -- hey, Nancy Pelosi, I'm looking at you -- to last a lifetime.
We don't need another.
Jake Tapper specifically brought her back in after Joe lied about his
record, and asked her about Joe's response and she's telling us about
Donald Trump.
I loathe Donald. That's never been a secret. But thus far, Donald has
not gotten the US into a full blown war. I can say that about him.
I have no idea why Tulsi behaved the way she did, but she was an
embarrassment. I don't think she will recover from it. I think that a
lot of people are pretending they didn't see what they saw, for whatever
reason. Read Mike's post (he's very upfront that he thought she did
well but his dad's telling him he's only thinking that because he
already supported Tulsi). But you can only delude yourself for so long
-- unless you're insane. And this is going to gnaw at her supporters.
As far as I'm concerned, unless she's offers some apology/excuse (I was
sick, I got bad news before the debate, etc.), it's over for her.
And it should be.
She was on that stage for one reason only, to seriously address what these wars are costing us.
"We're not able to fight al Qaeda fully" is not why people donated to
her. It's not why they supported her or told their friends about her or
volunteered time on her campaign.
She betrayed everyone. Did she betray herself? I don't know. If the
Tulsi before last night was the real Tulsi then, yes, she betrayed
herself. But, again, I don't know who the real Tulsi is because that
woman on stage is someone I would rip apart day after day right here.
And I've not done that to Tulsi. I've defended her here. When the
nonsense -- which was anti-Hindu -- started about her, I defended her on
that as well.
I'm done.
I'm done and she's done.
She's a fake ass who shouldn't be on the stage.
And for any who missed it, Tulsi ripped into Kamala Harris. She came
prepared to rip into her about Kamala's record as attorney general of
California.
She had no criticism for Joe Biden over the war? Over the mess that is
Iraq -- the county he oversaw per Barack for eight years?
No criticism at all.
Tulsi also pulled a Tim Ryan in the debate.
In June, Tim was the biggest idiot on stage during the two debates as he
claimed that the Taliban attacked the US on 9/11. It was Tulsi who
corrected him (al Qaeda attacked the US).
She was Tim Ryan last night.
Kamala had touted her Medicare For All plan and noted to Joe Biden, who
was ripping it apart, that it had the support of Kathleen Sebelius.
Kathleen was Secretary of Health and Human Services in Barack's first
term, she was the public face of ObamaCare for the administration.
Kamala's point was a solid point. (I don't care for Kathleen and never
have -- no surprise to anyone who remembers what I've previously written
of her. Her endorsement does not impress me.) Tulsi ripped into her
for this insisting that allowing Kathleen to write the legislation --
As Kamala said, she never said that. Kathleen didn't write it, she only publicly supported it after it was written.
Tulsi entire point was that Kathleen was being paid by a Medicare group
or something -- speak clearly and accurately, Tulsi -- and that's why we
have such bad policies because these are the people who are writing
them.
Kathleen didn't write it.
That was one of two times Tulsi went after Kamala. That time was
unscripted and suggested that Tulsi either doesn't listen very well or
needs a hearing aid. The second time she had prepared her remarks which
pisses me off even more.
To be clear, this is not, "Oh, Tulsi violated the sisterhood!" Women need to fight on that stage. I have no problem with that.
I do have a problem with Tulsi preparing remarks on Kamala Harris when she prepared none on Joe.
The Iraq War? Joe Biden has a huge responsibility for that.
Tulsi's our big anti-war voice, we're supposed to believe. But she was
Jill Stein last night, she wasn't running a campaign to win or a
campaign about issues that mattered to her, she was doing another
politician's work for him. Him. I'm so sick of these women who throw
their campaigns away for men. I never respect that in any regard. I
can give Pat Benatar credit for some of her work, for example, but her
turning her career over to her husband ran her fans off and they were
right to leave. I am so damn tired of women betraying themselves to
advance some man.
If Tulsi had gone after Joe as well, I wouldn't be as bothered. But she
went into that debate planning to take down another woman. Not to take
down the man who is so responsible for the destruction of Iraq.
She's an embarrassment. She should drop out now. And, honestly, she
may lose her House seat and I'd ignored requests to donate to her
opposition but right now I'd write a check in a minute, that's how
pissed I am at her.
Let's talk about Kirsten Gillibrand.
Wait, no. Don Lemon. First, Don. He never let Jay Inslee speak. Don
wanted to talk impeachment. It was a waste of time and more cany ass
moves from Don who's already notorious for b.s. like crying on camera.
After his support for hoaxer Jussie Smollett, nothing he does is taken
seriously but he did prevent Jay Inslee from addressing Iraq (Jay who
voted against the war) and he did prevent Bill DeBlasio from speaking
about the push for war on Iran (which Bill is against). Don Lemon is
not a moderator, he's an embarrassment.
Now let's get to Kirsten. And we're including Kamala and I need to
disclose that Willie Harris is very clear to me that he does not believe
Kamala gets a fair shake here. Is that true? Or is he pulling a
working the refs move on a friend? I don't know. I'll think about it.
But we'll start with her comments.
BASH: Senator Harris, your response?
HARRIS:
I think that's support of my proposal, which is this. Since 1963, when
we passed the Equal Pay Act, we have been talking about the fact women
are not paid equally for equal work. Fast forward to the year of our
lord 2019, and women are paid 80 cents on the dollar, black women 61
cents, Native American woman 58 cents, Latinas 53 cents.
I'm
done with the conversation. So, yes, I am proposing in order to deal
with this, one, I'm going to require corporations to post on their
website whether they are paying women equally for equal work. Two, they
will be fined for every 1 percent differential between what they're
paying men and women, they will be fined 1 percent of their previous
year's profit. That will get everybody's attention.
BASH: Thank you, Senator.
HARRIS: Time for action.
BASH: Senator Gillibrand, what's your response? Will fining companies help solve the problem?
GILLIBRAND:
I think we have to have a broader conversation about whether we value
women and whether we want to make sure women have every opportunity in
the workplace.
And I want to address Vice
President Biden directly. When the Senate was debating middle-class
affordability for childcare, he wrote an op-ed. He voted against it, the
only vote, but what he wrote in an op-ed was that he believed that
women working outside the home would, quote, "create the deterioration
of family." He also said that women who were working outside the home
were, quote, "avoiding responsibility."
And
I just need to understand as a woman who's worked my entire career as
the primary wage earner, as the primary caregiver, in fact, the second
-- my second son, Henry, is here, and I had him when I was a member of
Congress.
So under Vice President Biden's
analysis, am I serving in Congress resulting in the deterioration of the
family, because I had access to quality affordable day care? I just
want to know what he meant when he said that.
BIDEN:
That was a long time ago, and here's what it was about. It would have
given people making today $100,000 a year a tax break for childcare. I
did not want that. I wanted the childcare to go to people making less
than $100,000. And that's what it was about.
As a single father who in fact raised three children for five years by myself, I have some idea what it cost.
I
support making sure that every single solitary person needing childcare
get an $8,000 tax credit now. That would put 700,000 women back to
work, increase the GDP by almost 8/10 of 1 percent. It's the right thing
to do if we can give tax breaks to corporations for these things, why
can't we do it this way?
GILLIBRAND: But
Mr. Vice President, you didn't answer my question. What did you mean
when you said when a woman works outside the home it's resulting in
quote, the deterioration of family ...
BIDEN: No, what I ...
GILLIBRAND:
And that we are voiding -- these are quotes. It was the title of the
op-ed and that just causes concern for me because we know America's
women are working. 4 out of 10 moms have to work. They're the primary or
sole wagers. They actually have to put food on the table.
8
out of 10 moms are working today. Most women have to work to provide
for their kids. Many women want to be working to provide for their
communities and to help people.
BASH: Thank you, Senator. Let the vice president respond now, thank you.
GILLIBRAND: So either you don't believe it today or what did you mean when you said it then?
BIDEN:
The very beginning my deceased wife worked when we had children. My
present wife has worked all the way through raising our children. The
fact of the matter is the situation is one that I don't know what's
happened.
I wrote the Violence against
Women Act. Lilly Ledbetter. I was deeply involved in making sure the
equal pay amendments. I was deeply involved on all these things. I came
up with the it's on us proposal to see to it that women were treated
more decently on college campuses.
You came
to Syracuse University with me and said it was wonderful. I'm
passionate about the concern making sure women are treated equally. I
don't know what's happened except that you're now running for president.
(APPLAUSE)
GILLIBRAND:
So I understand -- Mr. Vice President -- Mr. Vice President, I respect
you deeply. I respect you deeply but those words are very specific. You
said women working outside the home would lead to the deterioration of
family.
My grandmother worked outside the home. My -- my mother worked outside the home. And -- and ....
BASH: Thank you, Senator GILLIBRAND.
(CROSSTALK)
I want to bring Senator Harris into this conversation.
GILLIBRAND: Either he no longer believes it -- I mean I just think he needs to ...
BIDEN: I never believed it.
'I never believed it.' Well you wrote it.
Again, stop the whoring. Gloria Steinem needs to sit her tired ass down
and take every Joe defending woman along with her. Joe does not
deserve our defense. Revisionary history insists he's basically a
feminist. He's not. He never was.
Kirsten's comments and raising the issue go to the fact that Joe will
say whatever is popular at the time. He never believed it? Well he
damn well pretended he did. And he pretends a lot, doesn't he? Why
should we believe a promise he makes today knowing how many times he has
said something that he now insists he did not believe.
Let's note Kamala one more time.
BASH: Thank you. Senator Harris, please respond.
HARRIS:
Well, I just -- listen, I mean talk about now running for president,
you change your position on the Hyde Amendment, Vice President, where
you mad a decision for years to withhold resources to poor women to have
access to reproductive healthcare and including women who were the
victims of rape and incest.
Do you now say
that you have evolved and you regret that? Because you have only, since
you've been running for president this time, said that you had -- you in
some way would take that back or you didn't agree with the decision
that you made over many, many years.
And
this directly impacted so many women in our country and I personally
prosecuted rape cases and child molestation cases; and the experience
that those women have, those children have and that they would then be
denied the resources ...
