Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Guns & Butter, the war hawk Hillary


I love Isaiah's latest, "Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts 'The Beat of Black Wings/ The Screech of the War Hawk'." It's Hillary going ballastic at the so-called Take Back America.

Take it back from what? NAFTA? Well Hillary's got a connection there, right? Take it back from the war on poor women? Hey, Hillary helped sell the so-called "welfare reform." Why was this woman even invited to speak?

I asked C.I. why, in two posts this morning, Hillary wasn't on one side of the page? C.I. replied, "You mean the left? You want me to put Hillary on the left?" We both laughed.


Normally, the illustrations come on the left at The Common Ills. But I completely understand why C.I. didn't put it that way this morning. My blogroll is on the right so I will put the illustration on the left. If you missed it, the so-called Take Back America stabbed CODEPINK in the back. Me? I'll hang with CODEPINK -- they speak truth and they're a lot of fun. They're creative as hell and they've never forgotten Iraq which is more than you can say about most of the "left" organizations. Medea Benjamin writes about what happened in "Peace Activists at Hillary Clinton's Speech Try to Take Back 'Take Back America'," so read that.

Thanks to C.I. for giving a heads up for me (this morning for Guns and Butter). I was in the desert. (That's "desert," I didn't dive into something chocolate or frothy! Though I am hungry.) A group of friends wanted to go and I liked the idea. We left Sunday morning (as soon as I'd done my part with the gang on The Third Estate Sunday Review.) and we stayed out there until Wednesday morning. I got home around noon, took a shower, made a sandwich (don't tell Trina!) and sat down to listen to KPFA broadcasts Guns and Butter.

Bonnie Faulkner interviewed Kevin Ryan (who I kept calling "Jack Ryan" all day -- and I've never seen any of those movies or read the books -- I don't care for the author or the message of those Clear & Present Danger films). Ryan worked for Underwriters Labs and they were the company that certified the steel in the World Trade Center towers. There was a problem with a finding and Ryan pointed out (that the steel was exposed to hot enough temperatures that would cause it to melt) in a letter. The letter ended up being posted online. He was fired as a result with the claim being that he had presented himself as a spokesperson for the company or some such nonsense.

They fired him to silence him. If that weren't the case, he wouldn't be fired. He might be warned, he might be disciplined. There was a discussion about the way the floors dipped or bent that was way over my head. It probably won't be over your head so make a point to listen to this interview. Why fire someone?

If you think they've made a fool of themselves, you discipline them. If you think they weren't clear enough in something that went online (he didn't post it), you explain the policy to them. You only freak out and fire them if you're nervous.

So why was Underwriters Lab nervous? What did Ryan do that made them nervous? If you want to know that, you'll need to listen to KPFA's Guns and Butter every Wednesday at one o'clock (PST) or you can use the archives at either link and listen at a time that's better for you.

Please read Elaine's "A difference of opinion" which is wonderful (and I did like the comments re: psychiatry -- it has a long history of anti-woman bias due to its Freudian roots). Also read Rebecca's "jason" which not only says some things that need to be said, it also shows the part of Rebecca that makes us all love her so much. She doesn't drop someone. She's fiercely protective. Read "Ruth's Public Radio Report" because you will be screaming, "Go Ruth!" I did.

I plan to blog again this week and I'll note some other things then. Loved the desert. Wish I was still there. I'm closing with a verse (same one C.I. used) from Joni Mitchell's "The Beat of Black Wings:"

"They want you -- they need you --
They train you to kill --
To be a pin on some map --
Some vicarious thrill --
The old hate the young
That's the whole heartless thing
The old pick the wars
We die in 'em
To the beat of --
the beat of black wings"

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Guns and Butter, Betty's latest chapter and more

Several things. First, a number of e-mails asked about posts? We just had a primary yesterday. (And a very low turnout.) I was trying to get the word out on the propositions so that even people who didn't give a damn about the candidates and, sorry, American Democrats, but most of us didn't give a damn about the Democratic nominee for governor. They weren't that different and no one felt like voting was going to make that big of difference.

Since that was top of the ticket, that might have depressed turnout.

I can't believe that we've got another boring candidate. We had it with Bustamante as well. But the national media wanted to act like there was really a race there between him and Ahnuld. There wasn't.

Ahnuld looks far less than 'good guy' that some uninformed voters thought he was last time; however, I'm not looking forward to the general election with any expectations.

There may be a lesson here. The lesson everyone's pushing is that because Marcy Winograd lost to Jane Harmon, the stay silent on the war and everything else is a good solution. The truth that the national media seems unaware of is that Harmon put out a last minute commercial talking about the need to hold people accountable. A friend saw it and called me excitedly, "She will go for impeachment!" She won't. But there was no talking my friend out of the mistaken belief.

Here's what I see. Take for what you think it's worth.

The lesson from Marcy is that she got basically a third of the vote, running against a powerful incumbent. If Marcy had more time, she probably could have gotten even more. So the lesson here is that Dems shouldn't be so damn complacent.

I think that carries to the top of the ticket this race. We saw two boring candidates vie for the Dem nomination for governor and our reaction was not just too yawn, it was too stay home.
That's a lesson Dems might want to consider nationally.

Ahnuld's unpopular. So is the Bully Boy. But if you don't run campaigns that speak to people, people may not show up. So we could very easily be spending December thinking, "What happened? The Democrats seemed to have a lock on it."

I also, dropping back to lack of posts, had my nieces visiting last week.

I almost didn't finish the album review. C.I. said not to worry about but I said I'd have it done on Saturday and I made it just barely. ("Kat's Korner: Janis Ian blows in on a gentle breeze")

This week? Now that the election's over, I'm moving a little slower. I did make Trina's latest
"Potatoes Anna in the Kitchen" and they turned out pretty well.

By the way three members are bothered that in Mike's "My interview with Kat" I came out in favor of dropping highlights to keep the "Iraq snapshot" at The Common Ills. That interview was done on Wednesday ("while voting was still going on!" wrote one) but I already knew it wouldn't post until Thursday evening. Voting ended Thursday at noon (EST) on that issue. By the time my remarks went up, the voting was over. So the "influencing" I was accused of attempting really only means influencing Mike and I'll go ahead and break it to the three, everyone doing a site had already discussed this and all felt that the "Iraq snapshot" was more important than highlights.

Rebecca, in "todd chretien, music and wmd," voiced her opinion while the vote was going on. We agreed but even if we hadn't, she can voice her opinion anytime she wants. That's her right.

What I did feel bad about was talking about Isaiah's illustrations. I meant what I said but I know it makes him nervous when he feels there are expectations to be met. I did wonder, "Was there really a wedding he had to attend or was that an excuse because I'd made him nervous with all my praise?" (There was no comic Sunday.)

Other than that, I don't regret anything in the interview.

KPFA broadcasts Guns and Butter and it aired it's latest today. I hope you were listening. William Pepper's speech was this week's show. William Pepper. Say it with me, "William Pepper." Why? The New York Times wrote another one of their silly pieces (this one on the 9/11 truth movement convention) and worked real hard to avoid mentioning him by name. It was a very curious article. The New York Times was mentioned by Pepper on today's show. He talked about how James Earl Ray was supposedly a part of a bank robbery -- that's where he supposedly got his money. The Times broke that story on their front page.

But Pepper spoke to the police, he spoke to the bank president. Ray wasn't involved and they hadn't talked to the paper. It was just disinformation. He talked about how, in the fifties, twelve (I believe it was twelve) positions were created at the paper for the CIA and that those slots continue to this day.

Is that why the paper avoided mentioning him by name this week? Who knows?

(To give credit where it's due, he noted that Carl Bernstein had broken that story in the seventies.)

KPFA's Guns and Butter airs every Wednesday and if you missed it or if you didn't know about it and are thinking, "I'm curious" -- you can use either link to access an archived broadcast which you can listen to at no charge.

Now a correction to something at The Common Ills today. I did help Betty today. I called her at work this morning to say, "You're 'husband' is on TV!" Amy Goodman interviewed him (Thomas Friedman on "Petropolitics", Iraq, Israel-Palestine and the "Excuse Makers"). But someone else helped as well. What I did was type up some things she dictated. Betty sends drafts to C.I. in e-mails. C.I.'s the one who went through the three "scraps" (Betty's word) looking for useable pieces. C.I. assembled them, e-mailed them to me and I read them to Betty who made changes in her original versions and created the new section about the interview. That's just how C.I. is, always the first to give credit and always the last to accept any.

But Betty saw that and asked me if I could note here that there was another helper.

I wasn't trying to urge her to write, by the way. I know she's busy. But it blew me away that Thomas Friedman was a guest and Betty listens in the evening, driving to the daycare after work, then driving home with kids. I could just picture her going off the road without a heads up to who was on. When she found out, she said, "I have to write something today."

But it's a church night for her. So there's really no time. When we got off the phone, she was going to try to think of something. Then I called C.I. and suggested if it was mentioned, the interview, with a few comments, at The Common Ills then Betty might not feel so much pressure to try to make time to write. C.I. said, she had three pieces already that she was working on and maybe something could be pulled from each?

Then a few minutes later (I think 15) C.I. called me and asked if I was calling her. I'd planned to because she's got a promotion a work and those can be stressful. So I generally do call at least once a day right now just to give her a pep talk. So it was no problem to call again (maybe it was a problem for her -- to get another call for me!) C.I. told me about the "montage." So I called
Betty and read it to her. She made a few changes (it was a montage of three pieces she was working on, to be clear, all writing was Betty's) and I posted it for her.

Don't expect that happen to again. (Not my helping her but morning posts from her.) But this was a rare thing. She covers Thomas Friedman and he was on the community's favorite program. So she felt she had to write something about it. So she did. And just before noon (EST) you had "Thomas Friedman, the Jayne Mansfield of the New York Times." Be sure to check it out.

Saturday, June 03, 2006

I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked

ah, Carl, while you are not safe I am not safe, and
now you're really in the total animal soup of
time
and who therefore ran through the icy streets obsessed
with a sudden flash of the alchemy of the use
of the ellipse the catalog the meter & the vibrat-
ing plane,
who dreamt and made incarnate gaps in Time & Space
through images juxtaposed, and trapped the
archangel of the soul between 2 visual images
and joined the elemental verbs and set the noun
and dash of consciousness together jumping
with sensation of Pater Omnipotens Aeterna
Deus
to recreate the syntax and measure of poor human
prose and stand before you speechless and intel-
ligent and shaking with shame, rejected yet con-
fessing out the soul to conform to the rhythm
of thought in his naked and endless head,
the madman bum and angel beat in Time, unknown,
yet putting down here what might be left to say
in time come after death,
and rose reincarnate in the ghostly clothes of jazz in
the goldhorn shadow of the band and blew the
suffering of America's naked mind for love into
an eli eli lamma lamma sabacthani saxophone
cry that shivered the cities down to the last radio
with the absolute heart of the poem of life butchered
out of their own bodies good to eat a thousand
years.


Kat: Now what's all that? The conclusion of Allen Ginsberg's "Howl." And we're noting it because? It's the fiftieth anniversary of the poem. I did not know that. But Laura Flanders is on the ball as always and will be noting the anniversary shortly when RadioNation with Laura Flanders begins broadcasting in less than a half hour:Unlikely allies: Ronald Reagan's lawyer, BRUCE FEIN, will join us, fresh from giving the Congress an earful on how they're giving in to a power-grabbing executive.And on the 50th Anniversary of Allen Ginsberg's poem 'Howl', ANN WALDMAN and ELLIOT KATZ will let us in on how a beat poet changed their world.On Sunday, Progressive Democrat MARCY WINOGRAD will be our guest, She's waging an upstart primary campaign against California Congresswoman Jane Harmon.And next weekend we broadcast live from our Seattle affiliate: Progressive Talk KPTK 1090AM.Broadcasting over local airwaves on Air America Radio, over XM satellite radio and online, RadioNation with Laura Flanders can be heard from seven to ten p.m. Eastern Standard Time, Saturday and Sunday nights. And if you missed last Saturday, you missed a wonderful discussion on the war (we wrote about that at The Third Estate Sunday Review in "Laura Flanders and Anthony Arnove discussed realities about Iraq Saturday on RadioNation with Laura Flanders"). So make a point to listen.