Tuesday, October 27, 2020

Joni

calm deliberation

 

 

That's  Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "The Calm Deliberation of Hysterical Stelter."  Isaiah's been on a hot streak of late with his comics.  

 

Joni Mitchell's new collection drops Friday.  I've heard one disc only so far.  But it drops Friday and, in advance of that, THE GUARDIAN has an interview with her:

 

CC The last song on disc three is a rare recording of you singing Sugar Mountain, the Neil Young song that inspired The Circle Game. You mention that Vicky Taylor first played you Sugar Mountain.

JM Vicky was a folk singer, and she was very kind and very generous to me, which I was not used to. I met her in Toronto. Yeah, she wasn’t competitive or vicious, like some of them. The folkies were so competitive. She was really nice, and she was dating Neil at the time. I’d met him when he was 18. He’d already gone to California. We were in different hemispheres; I needed to go to Detroit and New York before I got to California. Vicky played me the song. She’s a good girl.

 

CC Does the muse still speak to you?

JM It hasn’t for a while. I haven’t been writing recently. I haven’t been playing my guitar or the piano or anything. No, I’m just concentrating on getting my health back [from a 2015 aneurysm]. You know what? I came back from polio, so here I am again, and struggling back.

CC Is that how you would characterise the last five years?

JM Just inching my way along. I’m showing slow improvement but moving forward.

CC With bells on.

JM Yeah, because once again I couldn’t walk. I had to learn how again. I couldn’t talk. Polio didn’t grab me like that, but the aneurysm took away a lot more, really. Took away my speech and my ability to walk. And, you know, I got my speech back quickly, but the walking I’m still struggling with. But I mean, I’m a fighter. I’ve got Irish blood! [long laugh] So you know, I knew, “Here I go again, another battle.” [The kitten is now happily crawling up her neck.] Look at this face! He looks like my baby. The high cheekbones and everything.

 

CC Who are you listening to? Any of the newer artists who’ve been influenced by you, like Harry Styles or Billie Eilish?

JM I have music. I don’t listen to too much contemporary music. Babyface I’m listening to – that’s about it. Babyface and Leela James.

CC When you go out now, to the Grammy parties, for example, or even when you visited our play, I’ve noticed a kind of admiring line of fellow artists who want to share their appreciation or questions or compliments about the music. What’s it like for you on the receiving end?

JM It means a great deal to me. I got a letter from a little girl in Ireland who wrote to me. Her father was in a rock’n’roll band and they were going off to play someplace. She went outside to see them off, and one of the guys in the band came up to her and said, “Here, you should have this.” And he gave her what she called a “wonky tape recorder.” It had The Circle Game on it and he said, “This is a song that you should know, a girl your age.” At that time the English were terrorising Ireland, and they’d fly over in battalions with helicopters, and they’d do it at 8pm, right when the people were putting their children to bed. She said it was terrifying, this brigade of helicopters going over, and “I survived the war by putting the wonky tape recorder up to my ear and listening to The Circle Game.” It’s hard to beat that, in terms of reward for your song. I found that very exciting.

 

About this new collection:


JONI MITCHELL ARCHIVES VOL. 1: THE EARLY YEARS (1963-1967) features nearly six hours of unreleased home, live, and radio recordings that flow chronologically to paint a rich portrait of Mitchell’s rapid growth as a performer and songwriter during the period leading up to her debut album. This treasure trove of unheard audio includes 29 original Mitchell compositions that have never been released before with her vocals.

-
This 5CD collection includes a 40-page booklet that features many unseen photos from Mitchell’s personal collection as well as new liner notes featuring conversations between writer/filmmaker Cameron Crowe and Mitchell, who recently spent a couple of Sunday afternoons together discussing her archives. Crowe will continue to provide liners for future releases in the series.
-
Through a wealth of unreleased live performances, home recordings, and radio broadcasts, ARCHIVES VOL. 1 brings into focus the period when Mitchell was finding her voice artistically. It shows her moving away from the folk standards of her early days (“John Hardy” and “House Of The Rising Sun”) and starting to write and sing her own songs (“Day After Day” and “Urge For Going.”)
-
ARCHIVES VOL. 1 reveals just how prolific a songwriter Mitchell was at the time. In addition to early versions of songs that would appear on Song To A Seagull (“Michael From Mountains” and “I Had A King”), the set also features songs destined for later albums: “Chelsea Morning” “Both Sides Now” (Clouds, 1969); “The Circle Game” (Ladies of the Canyon, 1970); and “Little Green” (Blue, 1971).
-
More than a just historic document, these recordings crackle with energy thanks to a vibrant and enchanting Mitchell. On many, you can hear her turning tuning her guitar and telling a story about the song before playing it. That includes her rare 1967 cover of Neil Young’s “Sugar Mountain,” a song she says inspired her to write “The Circle Game.”
-
The collection begins in 1963 with her earliest-known recording as a 19-year-old Mitchell performs at CFQC AM, a radio station in her hometown of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. The box culminates with a stirring, three-set 1967 nightclub performance recorded at the Canterbury House in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

 

That's from the AMAZON page for the new album and you can use that link to order it.

Closing with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

 

 Tuesday, October 27, 2020.  Suadad al-Salhi remains targeted in Iraq, Joe Biden continues to campaign on nothing, real issues are ignored by both Joe and the press, and much more.


America's long nightmare will soon be over.  The Trump presidency?  No, the hysteria over the election as if voting ever changed anything.  Emma Goldman was right: "If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal."  The American Empire goes on, regardless of who is in the White House.  Donald Trump is crass and that seems to upset a number of neocons and neolibs.  He's not the different from Barack Obama -- who made a mockery of the lead water in Flint -- except he's less smooth.  They're madmen, the criminals who run the United States.  They terrorize the world and a lot of Americans fool themselves otherwise.


As Gloria La Riva observes, the Democrats and the Republicans are two pillars of the Pentagon.




Gloria is the US presidential candidate for the Party for Socialism and Liberation.


2020 could have been a change moment.  Bernie Sanders isn't an especially smart person, not especially wise and he certainly never demonstrated much of a backbone in his Congressional career but, in 2020, he did run on real issues, on the actual needs of the American people.  That's why people responded to his campaign in such large numbers.  Had he received the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, you would have had an electrified electorate who would have made demands and held him to what he was promising.  Instead, the powers-that-be rigged the election for the worst person running for the nomination: Joe Biden.  


Joe promises nothing.  He will deliver nothing for the people.  He's pro-fracking, he's anti-New Green Deal, he's anti-Medicare For All and he's never held accountable for his actions with regards to Iraq.  In fact, the media has acted as though -- has lied -- his actions with Iraq began and ended in 2002 with his vote for the Iraq War.  Joe's been able to stand on the debate stage during the primaries, taking credit for Iraq and bragging that Barack put him in charge of Iraq.  Barack did put him in charge.  For eight years, Joe was in charge.  It was eight of the worst years the country has seen since the war began.


It was under Joe, for example, that the US government overturned the votes of the Iraqi people in 2010 and then brokered The Erbil Agreement to give the loser of that election, thug Nouri al-Maliki, a second term as prime minister.  It was under Joe that the US looked the other way as Nouri refused to honor the promises he made in The Erbil Agreement to get a second term.  This despite, please remember, the November phone call Barack made to Ayad Allawi promising that The Erbil Agreement had the full backing of the US government and would be enforced.  Allawi, of course, is the person the Iraqi people voted for.  This led to efforts to remove Nouri from office.  Moqtada al-Sadr, Masoud Barazani, Ayad Allawi, Ammar al-Hakim and other leaders announced their intent and Moqtada, while the process went on, repeatedly and publicly reminded that all Nouri had to do to stop the effort was to start implementing his side of The Erbil Agreement.  He refused, so they followed the removal process outlined in the Constitution, gathering signatures from MPs for the move for a no-confidence vote.  They gathered those signatures and submitted them to the then-president of Iraq, Fat Ass Jalal Talabani.


So Nouri was removed?


If you're asking that question, you're admitting the American media failed you.  It failed you in real time as this went down and it failed you for the last two years as they cheerleaded Joe and avoided reality.


Per the Constitution, Jalal's only role was to read the names into the record in Parliament.  Under pressure from Joe Biden (and with US monies being dangled before him) the corrupt and corpulent Jalal invented 'new rules.'  He had, he insisted, the obligation to verify the signatures.  Okay . . . but then he added that he had the right to make sure that not only did they sign the paper but that if he had the paper in his hand today and was holding it and giving them the stink eye, the people who signed would still sign.  He never revealed numbers but he insisted that a large number of MPs insisted that, yes, they signed but if, he was holding the petition in front of them today, they wouldn't sign it.


Joe's responsible for that.  Jalal's responsible for lying.  And Jalal got bit on his fat ass by karma.  He did that, he betrayed Iraq, and sensing that the Iraqi people were going to be outraged, immediately left the country.  He fled to Germany.  He lied to the Iraqi people telling them this was life-threatening surgery.  It wasn't.  He had elective knee surgery (his knees were shot from carrying that fat ass of his around) (seriously, he was most infamous in America for a trip to a bookstore where his fat ass fell to the ground and he had to be helped up -- this after he had the equivalent of lipo on the same trip).  Karam didn't like Jalal.  That's why it made true on his lies.  Meaning?  By the end of the year, it gave him a stroke -- in the midst of an argument with Nouri.  And he had to be medically transported to Germany.  And?  He never recovered.  He couldn't speak, he could barely move.


All of that got left out in the US press that pretended to cover Iraq.  So did the reality that Nouri's second term is responsible for the rise of ISIS.  Nouri was a delusional paranoid, as the CIA noted in early 2006.  That's why Bully Boy Bush selected him to be the prime minister of Iraq.  It was thought that Nouri's intense paranoia would make him easy for the US government to manipulate and control.  Joe wanted Nouri to have a second term and did not care about Nouri's make up or, for that matter, his actions.  By 2010, it was already known that Nouri was running secret prisons and torture cells in Iraq.  But Joe gave him that second term and one of the results was the rise of ISIS and ISIS seizing Mosul.


That's the actual record Joe bragged about in Democratic Party debates.  And the bordello that is the American press whored and looked the other way.  


They also looked the other way with regards to Jo Jorgensen which is why so many are unaware that -- by any standard -- Jo should have been on stage at the debates this month.  She's the presidential candidate for the Libertarian Party and voters in all fifty states can vote for, she has the ballot access.  There was no reason to bar her from the debates but no big corporate 'news' outlet wanted to write that article or serve up that video report, did they?



It's not enough that they rally behind Joe, they have to render invisible anyone who might challenge him -- that's a political opponent, that's Tara Reade or anyone else telling uncomfortable truths about Joe.  


And the reality is that the man they rally behind promises nothing and swears nothing will change, that a bunch of lying whores rally behind.


Howie Hawkins is the presidential candidate for the US Green Party.  At COUNTERPUNCH this morning, he notes:


The result of progressives consistently settling for the Democrats as the lesser evil has created a political dynamic has been moving US politics to the right for decades. The soft-right Democrats ignore progressive demands they pose no threat of taking their votes elsewhere. Instead, they adapt to the hard-right Republicans. Bill Clinton called it “triangulation.” Joe Biden calls it “working across the aisle.”

Meanwhile, the progressives in the Democratic Party are accommodating to Biden’s politics. Bernie Sanders is now for Medicare for All over 55 years old with a public option for the rest. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez took the Green New Deal slogan from the Greens and diluted the content in the non-binding resolution for a Green New Deal by dropping the essential immediate demand for a ban on fracking and new fossil fuel infrastructure, eliminating the rapid phase-out of nuclear power, removing the deep cuts in military spending to help fund the program, and extending the deadline for zero carbon emissions from 2030 to 2050. The words Green New Deal were not mentioned at the Democratic convention, in the Sanders-Biden Unity Task Force recommendations on climate, or in the Democratic Platform, which is pro fossil fuels and, for the first time in 50 years, pro nuclear.

There will be no Medicare for All or Green New Deal from the Democrats, let alone a retreat from military bloat, wars, and coups abroad. But these progressives counsel people to vote for them everywhere, which tells the Democrats to take them for granted because posed no threat to vote for the Greens anywhere.

I don’t support a safe states strategy. Every state is a battleground for the Green Party. The gas industry is fracking the hell out of battleground states Pennsylvania and Ohio where the ducking Democrats join the retrograde Republicans lending no support to the anti-fracking movement. Greens, not the Democrats, are fighting the expansion of the Enbridge oil pipelines that take Alberta tar sands oil and Bakken fracked oil across Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Minnesota on to oil refineries. In every state, Greens are taking on Democratic machines in the cities, and real estate industry that finances them, when we fight for affordable housing and against the brutality of police forces that do what the Democrats in the cities designed them to do, which is to keep downscale people, particularly Black people, down and out of upscale communities. They are set up to police the New Jim Crow lines of school district and municipal boundaries that segregate us by race and class.

We should all be concerned about the voter suppression activities of Trump and the Republicans. But Greens know from bitter experience that we should also be concerned about voter suppression in the form of party suppression by the Democrats. The Democrats were able to knock the Greens off the ballot in Montana, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania where the Green petitions had two to three times the required signatures, which was difficult to do in the Covid lockdown. But the Democrats are also legislating party suppression. For example, in New York the Democrats rammed through a law attached to the state budget bill in April while attention was focused on the pandemic that triples the number of votes the Greens need to keep their ballot line. Only Nader for president in 2000 and me in 2014 for governor ever got that many votes as a Green candidate in New York. If we lose the ballot line, we will need 45,000 good signatures – triple the old number – collected in a six-week window to get statewide candidates on the ballot. When the Socialist Party lost its ballot line in 1938 in New York, it never recovered it. There was not an independent left party with a ballot line in New York again until the Green Party, 1999-2002 and 2010-?.

I can understand why people in a close state would vote for Biden to stop Trump. I don’t agree, but I share their desire to get Trump out. But why aren’t the prominent progressives afraid of a repressive Democratic Party that is suppressing the Green Party?



AOC whores lately.  Did she ever do anything else?  I don't know.  But we called out AOC and Jane Fonda whoring yesterday.  Here's a discussion of Howie rightly calling out AOC.



AOC's a whore.  And Jane needs to shut up about the environment.  We're talking about a woman who just produced a glossy paged coffee book about the environment -- so thick headed, she didn't grasp that coated paper isn't biodegradable.  What an idiot.  

Yesterday, we noted a conversation Tara Reade took part in.  She pointed out that despite both Donald Trump and Joe Biden being accused by multiple women each of harassment and assault, the topic was never raised in either debate.  So much was ignored in the duopoloy debate.  




That's Howie talking about the environment.  You know what else the duopoly debate ignored?  Poverty.  You can say basically any word now on primetime TV.  The only word censored today is, in fact, poverty.  



That's Howie talking about poverty.  I haven't her 'Scranton Joe' talking about poverty.  Have you?  The duopoly debate certainly didn't address peace.  The US government has multiple wars going on across the globe and the Iraq War, for example, turns 18 years old in March.  But despite Donald and Joe both wanting to be sworn in as president in January 2021, neither had anything to say about peace or how to end these forever-wars.



You have many alternative to corporate Joe if you're voting.  You can vote for Gloria La Riva, Jo Jorgensen and Howie Hawkins, to name but three.  


Turning to Iraq and the threat against journalism and specifically against journalist Suadad  al-Salhy.  Suadad has reported for ALJAZEERA, THE NEW YORK TIMES, ASSOCIATED PRESS and REUTERS.  She currently reports for MIDDLE EAST EYE.  The Iraqi government is attempting to silence her.   RUDAW reports:


The Coalition For Women In Journalism (CFWIJ) is calling for the retraction of an arrest warrant issued for Middle East Eye journalist Suadad al-Salhy.

An Iraqi court ordered the arrest on October 22 over a libel lawsuit which is penalizable under Iraqi law by imprisonment, financial compensation or both. The warrant didn’t include information about the claimant, says the CFWIJ. 

Salhy’s arrest warrant came the same day the journalist published an exclusive report claiming that Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was behind Iraqi armed factions deciding to halt their attacks on US interests last week. 

No announcement of Salhy's arrest has been made.

“The Coalition For Women In Journalism condemns the arrest warrant against Suadad and expresses its solidarity with the journalist,” the organization said in a Friday statement. “CFWIJ calls upon the Iraqi authorities to amend the penal code to remove imprisonment of journalists for publishing and libel and to ensure a safe and free environment for women journalists in Iraq.”


This is the MIDDLE EAST EYE report she wrote that has resulted in her being targeted.  Wladimir van Wilgenburg (KURDISTAN 24) explains:


The report was posted to the web on Thursday and hours later, a judge at the Investigative Court in Karada issued a warrant for her arrest, charging her with “defamation.”

So in the view of the judge, Salhy had defamed Khamenei by stating that he was behind the militias’ declaration of a ceasefire.

The charge of defamation appears under article 443-1 of Iraq’s Penal Code and is punishable by a fine and a year in prison.

Kurdish officials have complained that despite Iraq’s liberal 2005 constitution, many laws from the deposed Baathist regime remain in effect.

Just why that article should have produced a charge of defamation—within mere hours of its publication—is not clear. It is quite possible that what really upset the judge in Karada (and any others who might have been involved) was Salhy’s earlier article, in which she reported, in detail, that Iran and its proxies in Iraq had retreated in the face of very serious US threats.

It is also unclear what authority the judge had to issue such a warrant or what investigation preceded its issuance, coming as it did, so soon after the article’s publication.

According to the website of Iraq’s Supreme Judicial Council, under which the Karada court operates, a court of investigation consists of one judge and one attorney, and it responds to complaints from local police stations.

For now, no further steps have been taken against Salhy, and both the CPJ and RSF have called on Iraqi authorities to refrain from executing the arrest warrant and to drop the charge against her altogether.


None of the reporters who have worked with her, including Ned Parker, have bothered to note what's going on right now.  I would've thought they would rush to support her and raise awareness about what's going on right now.  Scott Horton (ANTIWAR RADIO) interviewed her in February (see below) and he still hasn't even Tweeted about her being targeted.





Meanwhile, protests continue in Iraq and we'll note two video reports.





New content at THIRD:


The following sites updated:






Monday, October 26, 2020

Bob Dylan still sets the standard

thedebate

 

That's  Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "The Last Debate" which went up Sunday and so did my "Kat's Korner: Tramps like me, baby, we were born to bitch" which covers Bruce Springsteen's new album as well as notes Alicia Keys' ALICIA.


If you haven't read the review, I'm never reviewing Alicia's album.  Sorry.  It's a great album.  I planned to review it the Sunday after it came out.  But then RBG died.  I couldn't.  And each week after has been a nightmare as I tried to figure out how to review it.  I can't.  It's RBG's death in my head.  So I note that it's a great album -- in my Bruce review -- and I'm moving on.


Bob Dylan's ROUGH AND ROWDY WAYS is a great album.


The nonsense by Bruce?  He's released another useless album.  He's not working class.  He poses and he fakes.  Apparently between yachting with David Geffen and Barack Obama.  


Bruce is a fake. At this late date, having bilked fans for millions already, in the midst of a pandemic, he should be paying it forward with a free album for the fans.  Instead, he's just in it for the cash.


That doesn't surprise me.  It's not until the 80s that he pretends to be of the people.  Before that, he just comes off like a craven jerk on the way up.  


It's very telling to me that two male rock icons release albums this year and Bruce just wastes everyone's time while Bob Dylan not only tries to grapple with the world but hits a career high like he hasn't had in decades.


And yet Bruce claims ("Last Man Standing") to be the last rock star standing while all the other men have given up or died.


What a loser.


I don't see how Bob's 2020 album doesn't make my year's best.  It's that great.  I would guess right now that it will be in the top three.  It may be number one.  That'll depend upon what else comes out in the next two months.  But Bruce's album is another misfire that's just him trying to pay all the bills he has each month from having a mansion and living the high life.  Bruce is a joke.  Bob's a treasure.

 

Bruce could learn a lot from Bob Dylan.  Hell, Bruce could learn a lot from Huey Lewis.  But Bob's an artist.  I'm not sure what to call Bruce other than an embarrassment.








Closing with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


 Monday, October 26, 2020.  Assault survivor Tara Reade addresses what's needed next in the movement, Suadad al-Salhy is the latest reporter to be in jeopardy in Iraq, protests continue in Iraq, and much more.


Yesterday, Natalia Tylim hosted a conversation with Tara Reade.  Tylim belongs to the Tempest collective and is a member of the Democratic Socialist of America.







Natalia Tylim: In 1993, Tara was a Congressional aid and she was sexually assaulted at her work place by her boss, Joe Biden.  She chose not to come forward at that time but she filed a complaint and was soon let go from her job.  Flash forward to 2020 and her assaulter is the front runner to be the presidential candidate on the Democratic Party ticket.  On the heels of the #MeToo uprisng, she decided it was time to come forward.  In response, she was met with unbelievable cruelty, with attacks and smears, in an attempt to protect Joe Biden.  This allegation has yet to be investigated.  It has been tried and supposedly settled in the court of the mainstream liberal media.  But there has been no independent investigation and the pertinent documents that are being held at the University of Delaware have yet to be released.  If you choose to vote for Biden, we understand and we respect your individual voting choice.  But we also believe that that choice need not go hand-in-hand with throwing Tara Reade under the bus.  The mainstream feminist movement in this country has just failed a giant test.  It has fallen into the trap of blaming a survivor because of who her assaulter is and this is unacceptable and we need to rebuild a feminist movement on a stronger foundation or it will be completely toothless.  The feminist movement in the United States will not succeed if it is tied to the Democratic Party.  This is a party that has demonstrated time after time that our rights and our lives are negotiable to them.


Tara Reade's book, LEFT OUT: WHEN THE TRUTH DOESN'T FIT IN comes out this week:

The Ebook of my memoir will be available October 27th, and the hardcover will be available January 1st, 2021. tarareadeauthor.com


I will be reading the book.  I support Tara.  I do not support all that she's said in the above interview.  I don't think we need new laws or more laws, for example.  Why are people Tweeting death threats?  Because liars keep telling you this election is the game change, this is going to change the country forever, this is . . .  It's just an election.  Unless you're an idiot, you know the US is not perfect and hasn't been for some time.  You know Barack Obama put children into cages, you know he didn't end the Iraq War, you know he killed people -- including an American child -- with drones.  There is no going back to a 'perfect time' because no perfect time exists.  This is another election.  It will neither save nor kill the country.  Voting doesn't do either.  But all the rhetoric around this election?  That is why a Tara Reade gets death threats, for example.


I also don't agree with Tara's blanket support for all who come forward.  I have a brain and it's my job to use it.  If I don't believe your story, I will allow in most cases that I could be wrong and just find something other to cover.  But if I know you're a liar, I'm not getting behind you.  In our piece that Ava and I wrote last night, we note the hideous E. Jean Carroll.  We don't believe her.  We never have.  We know why she was fired from ELLE, we know her personal history.  That's before you get into her going on live TV, CNN, and telling a shocked Anderson Cooper that rape is "sexy."  She was 74 or 75 at the time, a public speaker, a journalist, a former TV show host.  She knew what she was saying and intended to say it.  Life's too short for me to waste my time supporting some whacko who goes on TV to tell America that rape is "sexy." 

 

I'm not going to spit on the work of Susan Brownmiller by acting like it's okay E. Jean Carroll goes on TV to insist that rape is "sexy."  Nor am I going to spit on the survivors of rape and assault (which would include me) by acting like that statement was okay. 


Meanwhile, ALJAZEERA reports:


Dozens of Iraqi protesters again clashed with security forces in Baghdad on Monday, a day after a rally marked the first anniversary of the start of nationwide mass anti-government demonstrations.

Police fired stun grenades and tear gas at protesters who were burning tyres and hurling rocks on the strategic Al-Jumhuriyah bridge across the Tigris River leading to the highly fortified Green Zone, an AFP photographer reported.

The bridge, barricaded by towering concrete walls, separates the Green Zone from Tahrir Square, the epicentre of the old and new demonstrations.

The highly-secure Green Zone, where government offices, parliament and the US embassy are located, is off-limits to most Iraqi citizens.


What's going on?  The year-long protests continue and yesterday was a day when they called for more protesters in the street.  And people turned out.  Louisa Loveluck and Mustafa Salim (WASHINGTON POST) report of Sunday:

In the heart of Baghdad, Iraqis awoke to find blue- and ­green-clad riot police fanned throughout central squares as concrete barricades blocked the gates to the heavily fortified Green Zone. Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi had pledged that security forces would avoid the kind of harsh crackdown carried out during the ­months-long protest movement. More than 500 protesters were killed.

[. . .]

Protesters reported late Sunday that riot police were firing into the air in an attempt to clear a nearby thoroughfare.

The October uprising, as it is known here, became one of the largest grass-roots movements in Iraq’s modern history as largely young crowds railed first against corruption and a lack of basic services and later against the entire system of sectarian politics — all of which have pushed the country to ruin.

But many of the protesters’ grievances have since only worsened. Tanking oil prices in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic have left Iraq with an unprecedented liquidity crisis. Iran-backed militias that human rights groups blame for some of the worst violence during the protests last year are more empowered than before. And the United States and Iran have dueled more openly on Iraqi soil than in earlier years.

Protests also occurred in Iraq’s southern cities Sunday, but none on the same scale as in Baghdad. Hundreds of youths had traveled to the capital, to join rallies there, instead of at home.


THE ASSOCIATED PRESS reported that tear gas was fired at the protestersArwa Ibrahim (ALJAZEERA) notes, "Iraqi security forces fired water cannon and tear gas at the protesters during Sunday’s demonstrations to prevent them crossing fences on a bridge leading towards government buildings."  No one notes that, October last year, they killed a protester by firing tear gas into the crowd -- a tear gas cannister was shot into his head. From the October 25, 2018 snapshot:


In addition, Qassim Abdul-Zahra (AP) reports, "Iraqi police fired live shots into the air as well as rubber bullets and dozens of tear gas canisters on Friday to disperse thousands of protesters on the streets of Baghdad, sending young demonstrators running for cover and enveloping a main bridge in the capital with thick white smoke. One protester was killed and dozens were injured in the first hours of the protest, security officials said."



The cost of freedom is always high, but Iraqis have always paid it. I’m sorry for the horrible video but this is the democracy USA brought to Iraq a protester been shot in head with tear gas canisters
/>
0:09

 

 



The first one killed is said to have been hit with a tear canister.  The video above is supposed to be of that protester after he was hit.



Human Rights Watch's Donatella Rovera Tweeted:


#IraqProtest back in full swing tonight - one year on and despite 600+ the killing of demonstrators by #Iraq’s security forces & #Iran-backed militias #يريدون_وطن


KURDISTAN 24 notes:


About 40 protesters and 17 security forces members were wounded in new clashes, one security source told Kurdistan 24, as protesters marked the first anniversary of “The October Revolution.”


Attilio Cotroneo Tweets:


“Our blood, our souls, we sacrifice for you #Iraq,” chanted hundreds of protesters as they marched through the capital’s #TahrirSquare, epicentre of the protest movement ⁦




And Adnan Mohanad Tweeted:


This kid a militia killed his father in the Iraqi revolution, and the son came carrying his father’s picture to complete the revolution. A free and great Iraqi generation, is very difficult for the slaves of authority to understand. #IraqProtest #الا_رسوال_الله #ثورة_اكتوبر
Image



The people of Iraq remain under threat.  The people of Iraq include the journalists. Dropping back to the September 24th snapshot about what took place, less reported, while Iraqi president Salih Barham spoke to the United Nations:


The western press loves Salih.  He's trying to thwart upcoming elections, he's corrupt and so much more, but they love him.  Especially in the US, they love Salih.  He's not the saint they portray him as.  The Committee To Protect Journalists issued the following yesterday:

New York, September 23, 2020 – Kurdish authorities in Iraq should immediately release journalist Bahroz Jaafer, drop all charges against him, and allow the press to cover and write critically about politicians without fear of detention or legal action, the Committee to Protect Journalists said today.

Yesterday, police arrested Jaafer, a columnist for the independent news website Peyser Press, in the northeastern Iraqi Kurdish city of Sulaymaniyah and transferred him to the Azmar police station, where he remains in detention, according to news reports and a statement by the Metro Center for Journalists’ Rights and Advocacy, a local press freedom group.

Authorities charged Jaafer with criminal defamation, according to the Metro Center. If tried and convicted under Article 433 of Iraq’s penal code, Jaafer could face up to one year in jail and a fine of up to 100 dinars (about 8 US cents).

The arrest was sparked by a defamation complaint filed by the lawyer of Iraqi President Barham Salih, in response to a column by Jaafer criticizing the president, according to those reports.

“Iraqi authorities should develop a thicker skin and stop resorting to the criminal code to stifle critical reporting and commentary,” said CPJ’s Middle East and North Africa representative, Ignacio Miguel Delgado. “Iraqi President Salih should immediately drop the defamation complaint against journalist Bahroz Jaafer, and local authorities should release him unconditionally.”

On August 29, Jaafer published a column titled “How much longer will the president be driving the wrong side?” in which he criticized Salih, also an ethnic Kurd, for allegedly failing to support Iraqi Kurdistan amid disputes with the national government over land, oil, and the autonomous region’s budget.

Karwan Anwar, head of the Sulaymaniyah branch of the government-funded Kurdistan Journalists’ Syndicate, told local broadcaster Rudaw that Jaafer, a member of the syndicate, is required to remain in detention until a hearing scheduled for September 30, unless he is granted bail beforehand.

The Iraqi president’s media office did not immediately reply to CPJ’s request for comment sent via messaging app. Dindar Zebari, the Kurdish regional government’s coordinator for international advocacy, did not immediately reply to CPJ’s emailed request for comment.


Salih's done nothing to help the Iraqi people -- that includes the Iraqi activists.  


Now another reporter is being targeted, Sudad al-Salhy.  MIDDLE EAST EYE notes of their correspondent:

An arrest warrant for Middle East Eye journalist Suadad al-Salhy has been issued in Iraq over the charge of “defamation”.

A judge at Tahqiq al-Karada Court issued the warrant on Thursday, requesting Salhy be taken to al-Alawiya police station.

No other details are provided and MEE is seeking more information from the court. According to the Iraqi penal code, Salhy could face up to one year in jail and a fine of 100 Iraqi dinars (US$0.08) if convicted of criminal defamation.



Suadad al-Salhy has reported with THE NEW YORK TIMES, ALJAZEERA, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and REUTERS.  She is an internationally recognized journalist and even that doesn't protect her.  Reporters Without Borders notes:


Reporters Without Borders (RSF) calls on the Iraqi authorities not to execute a warrant for the arrest of Suadad Al-Salhy, a Baghdad-based reporter for the Middle East Eye news website, and urges the judicial system to drop the charge brought against her.

Al-Salhy has learned that she could be arrested at any time as a result of a yesterday’s decision by the Supreme Judicial Council to arrest her under article 433-1 of the Penal Code for defamation, which is punishable by a fine and a year in prison.

 

The decision was taken just hours after Middle East Eye published a story by Al-Salhy in which she revealed that Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei ordered Iraq’s pro-Iranian militias to stop attacking US interests last week. The article is sourced and well documented.

 

“We ask the Iraqi authorities to ensure that Suadad Al-Salhy is not detained and that the judicial proceedings against her are dropped,” said Sabrina Bennoui, the head of RSF’s Middle East desk. “This journalist, who is known for her professionalism, just did her job. Revealing information, even sensitive information that annoys some people, is fundamental principle of the freedom to inform.”

 

This is not the first time Al-Salhy has had exclusives on very risky subjects in Iraq. In August, for example, she revealed that a former adviser to Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis – the co-founder of Iraq’s Hezbollah Brigades who was killed in a targeted US drone strike in January 2020 that also killed Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander Qassem Soleimani – accused the current prime minister, Mustafa Al-Kadhimi, of plotting to killed Muhandis several times in the past.

 

Al-Salhy has herself received threats in the past. She escaped a murder attempt by unidentified gunmen in 2007 and explosive devices were found outside her parent’s home in 2014.

 

Iraq is ranked 162nd out of 180 countries in RSF's 2020 World Press Freedom Index.


The Committee To Protect Journalists issued the following:


New York, October 23, 2020 – Iraqi authorities should drop the arrest warrant issued for journalist Suadad al-Salhy and allow the press to work freely, the Committee to Protect Journalists said today.

Yesterday, a judge at the Al-Karrada Investigative Court in Baghdad issued an arrest warrant for al-Salhy, a reporter for the Middle East Eye news website, on charges of defamation under Article 433 of the Iraqi Penal Code, according to the warrant, which CPJ reviewed, and a report by her employer. As of this afternoon, she was not in custody, according to a source who asked not to be named for fear of reprisal.

“The warrant for Suadad Al-Salhy’s arrest is a sad reminder that Iraqi journalists are facing constant threats of government harassment and obstruction,” said CPJ Middle East and North Africa representative Ignacio Miguel Delgado. “Press freedom entails allowing coverage of events of public interest and a wide range of viewpoints. Iraqi authorities should immediately drop the arrest warrant for al-Salhy and allow her to do her job freely and without fear of reprisal.”

The arrest warrant demands al-Salhy be taken to the Al-Alawiya police station, but does not say what actions prompted the order. If convicted of criminal defamation, al-Salhy could face up to one year in jail and a fine of 100 Iraqi dinars (US$0.08), according to the Iraqi penal code.

Al-Salhy has covered many sensitive issues in Iraq, including the role of militias, the country’s relations with Iran, and anti-government protests. She has contributed to international media outlets including Reuters, Al-Jazeera, and The New York Times.


Suadad's work has been important throughout the ongoing war.  She's often reported on issues others have ignored such as in November 2013 when Suadad al-Salhy and Isabel Coles (REUTERS) reported:



Domestic abuse and prostitution have increased, illiteracy has soared and thousands of women have been left widowed and vulnerable. Many women also rue the political leaders that came to power after Saddam was overthrown and the growing social conservatism that has diminished their role in public life.
Once at the vanguard of women's rights in the region, Iraq ranked 21st out of 22 Arab states in a poll of 336 gender experts released on Tuesday by Thomson Reuters Foundation (poll2013.trust.org).


She also covered the meat and potatoes issues such as in 2008 when Suadad and Katherine Zoepf (NEW YORK TIMES) reported the price of oil per barrel going up and slightly down has Iraq's concerned about their budget for next year and have cut it by $13 billion dollars. We've long noted her work at this site, for over a decade now.  She's one of the reporters who've remained covering Iraq by changing outlets -- Liz Sly and Jane Arraf would be two others.  I'm going to assume that they and the many reporters she's worked with in the past -- Ned Parker, among them -- will be at least offering a Tweet in support of her.  Ned certainly knows what it's like to be targeted by the government of Iraq, for example.  At present, there are two Tweets only.


The Iraqi Observatory for Human Rights Tweets:


@MAKadhimi
must protect the journalist, Suadad al-Salhy, who is facing a lawsuit over her newspaper articles. Al-Salhi is one of the most important and prominent Iraqi journalists.
@RSF_inter
@AmnestyIraq
@hrw
@CPJMENA
@SaadoonMustafa
Image


Arwa Ibrahim also Tweeted about Suadad:


The arrest warrant issued for Iraqi journalist Suadad al-Salhi came shortly after she published a piece saying Iran’s Khamenei had ordered and end to Iraqi attacks on US interests.

 


Kat's "Kat's Korner: Tramps like me, baby, we were born to bitch" went up Sunday as did Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "The Calm Deliberation of Hysterical Stelter" and his "The Last Debate."