President Donald Trump's attempt to add his name to
the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts is not yet complete, as it
requires an act of Congress for the name change to become official.
Trump may have to wait a little longer, according to legislation to fund
the federal agency that oversees the facility.
On Monday, House Appropriations Committee chairman Tom Cole
(R-Okla.) announced the release of finalized legislation to fund various
government agencies through Fiscal Year 2026. The bills fund the
Departments of Commerce, Interior, and Justice, and also agencies
overseeing federal investments in science, energy and water development.
A provision in the Appropriations Committee's legislation to fund
the Interior Department specifically refers to the "John F. Kennedy
Center for the Performing Arts," and New York Sun correspondent Matt
Rice observed on X that Trump's name is conspicuously absent from that
section. The bill allocates $32.34 million "for necessary expenses for
the operation, maintenance and security of the John F. Kennedy Center
for the Performing Arts" through September of 2027.
[. . .]
Early last year, Trump named himself chairman of
the Kennedy Center and replaced the institution's board with a
hand-picked cadre of political loyalists. That board voted last month to
change the name to put Trump's first, though the name change was
criticized as "illegal" as Congress has to officially vote on the name change.
Should the Interior Department funding bill become law, it would mean
that Congress has officially refused to recognize Trump's attempted name
change throughout the remainder of the 2026 fiscal year.
It is not currently the name of the building despite what
Chump had painted on it. I loved Stan's "Weekend Box Office, PARADISE" from last night but he is
even more right to call THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER out for using the
terminology "Trump Kennedy Center For The Arts." Some comments on the
article:
user-h7fypfgacv
19 hours ago
I mean it's a "memorial" so very confusing he is insistent on
this. He's made it very clear he is extremely jealous of the Kennedy
legacy but sad he can't just create his own memorial to himself instead.
L Neagle
6 hours ago
One- a memorial is named after a dead person. Two- congresses
didn't approve of this with a legal act. Three- you don't add another
name, on a named memorial.
This memorial naming requires a congressional act of congress; it
was named after the death of JFK a Kennedy. No matter how much any
person wants to see their name lit up along with a Kennedy, if you are
not a Kennedy it shouldn't be there. Memorials are for one person alone.
One more time, Robert Davis (RAW STORY) notes, "Trump
has been trying for months to rebrand the Kennedy Center as the
"Trump-Kennedy Center," a move that has caused a swarm of musicians to
boycott the acclaimed concert hall. He has affixed his name to the
building's exterior, although officially changing the name requires an
act of Congress because the center was created by federal law."
“The song that I did in the movie, he said, ‘I’m cutting that song
out ’cause I don’t want Cher to ruin my movie,'” Cher said, seated next
to co-star Kristen Bell, who noted that this was the first she’d heard
of this happening, but agreed it was a “hard shoot.” While Christina
Aguilera led the soundtrack as Ali, Cher recorded two songs for the film
as Tess, though she doesn’t specify which was in danger of being axed.
Early in the movie, Cher performs “Welcome to Burlesque” at the Los
Angeles burlesque club she owns, which plays a pivotal role in
inspiring Aguilera’s character to pursue her Hollywood dreams there.
Later on, with the possibility of losing her club due to financial
hardships weighing heavily, Cher performs the knockout solo “You Haven’t
Seen the Last of Me.” Both are foundational to the film.
I like BURLESQUE and always did. I think it gets richer
with each viewing. My one complaint was and remains that Cher's only got
two songs. That movie wouldn't have made a dime if Cher didn't have
two songs. Cher is an Academy Award winning actress and no one has a
longer span of hits than she does -- she has a number one in every
decade starting in the 60s. And the album? Three singles were released
from it. Only one was Cher singing -- "You Haven't Seen The Last Of
Me." It went to number one on the dance chart and was the only song
that was a hit.
That movie would have been nothing without Cher's two songs.
Tuesday, January 6, 2025. Chump and Bondi continue to withhold Epstein
documents, envious Pete Hegseth goes after Senator Mark Kelly, Kristi
Noem thinks that the American people should foot the bill for putting
ICE agents up at a Hilton, and much more.
Let's start with Pete Hegeseth's push-pull same-sex attraction, the root of his hatred/lust for Senator Mark Kelly.
Three
times. That's the number of times the 45-year-old 'traditionalist'
male has been married. Three. And they don't last. What we're looking
at it a man who apparently spent his entire life in the midst of
homosexual panic. Gets with a woman because she's got a masculine
energy but after awhile? That's not enough for him to get it up. So he
moves on to a more mannish wife -- and the current wife, wife number
three, looks like a man. Someone who knows Pete didn't buy the
hypothesis at first.
But he loves to go to strip joints!
He
does, I agreed. He goes to them with other men. The strippers are
props, not equals an what he's really there for is to see these men he
kind of knows get aroused.
Women are nothing but props for him and that's why he keeps attacking our women who serve in the military.
So
we've got Pete horny for men, desperate for men, and he's going after
Senator Kelly who represents everything that Pete doesn't. Kelly's
honest, he's given real service -- not the mincing and backstabbing that
Pete did during his brief service -- "brief service" -- I hear a Pete
acquaintance laughing at that. The one who told me about how Pete is
all 'don't bathe don't bathe!' whenever he's got one of his man cave
weekend. Pete is a joke.
Senator Mark Kelly issued the following statement yesterday:
“Over
twenty-five years in the U.S. Navy, thirty-nine combat missions, and
four missions to space, I risked my life for this country and to defend
our Constitution — including the First Amendment rights of every
American to speak out. I never expected that the President of the United
States and the Secretary of Defense would attack me for doing exactly
that.
“My rank and retirement
are things that I earned through my service and sacrifice for this
country. I got shot at. I missed holidays and birthdays. I commanded a
space shuttle mission while my wife Gabby recovered from a gunshot wound
to the head — all while proudly wearing the American flag on my
shoulder. Generations of servicemembers have made these same patriotic
sacrifices for this country, earning the respect, appreciation, and rank
they deserve.
“Pete Hegseth wants
to send the message to every single retired servicemember that if they
say something he or Donald Trump doesn’t like, they will come after them
the same way. It’s outrageous and it is wrong. There is nothing more
un-American than that.
“If Pete
Hegseth, the most unqualified Secretary of Defense in our country’s
history, thinks he can intimidate me with a censure or threats to demote
me or prosecute me, he still doesn’t get it. I will fight this with
everything I’ve got — not for myself, but to send a message back that
Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump don’t get to decide what Americans in this
country get to say about their government.”
The
failure that is Pete Hegseth thinks he's going to demote Kelly after
the fact? That might last a second or two but it's not going to stand.
And
the reason Pete's doing it -- yeah, Pete, I know, I'm that far into
your inner circle -- is because he couldn't win a trial against Kelly.
Unlike Pete, Mark has a lifetime of service.
And
a military trial? Pete was told he'd lose big. He was told any
military court would side with Mark. Couldn't take it down to the whore
in Florida because this isn't a civilian case.
This
is a military justice case and no one was going to convict Kelly of the
'crime' of stating basic military policy in public. That's not a
crime. And the military would also see this for what it was --
politicization of the military and that would reject those grounds.
As it was explained to Pete, "You're going to look like a little jealous bitch trying to smear the reputation of a great man."
Pete
being called a "little bitch" in the same sentence that another guy is
called "a great man?" Oh, you know he was on the phone, "Baby, stop
everything and get into bed. It's been a few months but I finally got a
hard on again! No, you don't have to put on the Jake Paul mask. Well
. . . Put it on, itmight help."
The sad life
of Pete Hegseth who could have addressed his panic long ago but instead
gets off on humiliation. He must be in heaven every ay because, if you
love humiliation, the Donald Chump administration is where you need to
be.
Just ask Pam Bondi.
Last weekend, Mike named Pam da Bimbo Bondi "Idiot of the Week" and it may be the only award she's ever deserved to win:
The Guardian reports incoming Attorney General Pam Bondi had no place for ethics training while taking the reins at the Department of Justice.
“I
think the reason to fire the senior ethics attorney at DOJ is pretty
clear. It’s to send a message,” said Joseph Tirrell, an attorney
responsible for overseeing ethics compliance across the agency and
training top officers in their obligation. “The message is: ‘Do what we
tell you to do, or you’ll lose your job.’”
Tirrell
was nearing the end of a July vacation when he got an email from the
Department of Justice on his personal account. The notice, signed by
Bondi, misspelled his name as “Jospeh W Tirrell,” and did not give a
reason for his firing. The Guardian reports Tirrell bosses initially
seemed as surprised as he was before confirming that he had indeed been
removed from the payroll.
Tirrell, 51, joined
the FBI as an ethics lawyer in 2006 before moving to the justice
department in 2018. During that time, he fielded requests about whether
or not employees could accept certain gifts or attend certain events and
other conflicts of interests. He notes that Bondi and her chief of
staff appeared focused on questions of whether the attorney general
could accept commemorative challenge coins from subordinates in the
department during training.
“There seemed to be
a lot of importance by these officials placed on [the] appearance of
them getting stuff, on the appearance of them showing their willingness
to accept that gift,” Tirrell said.
Tirrell
recalls telling Bondi: “We’ve pretty much said you can’t accept gifts
from employees unless it’s your birthday or Christmas or Hanukkah or a
similar kind of holiday where people give gifts,” and added that “We
spent more time than I thought was warranted on … whether or not you
could accept a challenge coin from whomever.”
The
attorney said he caught his first whiff of Bondi’s ethical failings
when she received a box of cigars from the mixed martial artist Conor
McGregor. The value of the gift, he said, exceeded what Bondi could
accept under the department’s ethics rules, so he spelled out three
options for her: reimburse McGregor for the gift, send it back, or
destroy it.
“Immediately I got the sense they were reluctant to send things back or destroy stuff,” said Tirrell.
“’No, we can’t send it back,’” the administration told him. “’I mean what does that say?’”
A
buffoon and a crook. She really found an administration she belonged
in, didn't she. It's as though the missions statement when Chump was
putting together his cabinet was: Give me your most f**ked up and your
most corrupt
That's certainly what he got.
They continue to flounder.
The illegal actions in Venezuela?
Ben goes over that this morning on MEIDASTOUCH NEWS.
David Rothkopf addressed the issue in greater detail on THE DAILY BEAST podcast yesterday.
Last night on MS NOW, Rachel Maddow addressed the ever changing claims of the Chump administration.
Some more commentary and analysis.
Of
course, one of the reasons -- one among many -- he launched the
operation was to try to distract from the fact that The Epstein Files
are not being released. He and Pam Bondi are in violation of the act of
Congres ordering the release of the files. Pam has missed every date
on the Epstein Act so far, by
the way. Jennifer White (THE HILL) reports:
The
Justice Department (DOJ) has drawn criticism for releasing only parts
of the records required by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Many
documents were heavily redacted, and some were temporarily removed. The
law, signed in November 2025, set a strict deadline of December 19,
2025.
President Donald Trump defended the rollout and said the government had provided more than 100,000 pages. However,
However,
on December 31, the DOJ admitted that it had identified approximately
5.2 million pages of records that fall under the law, far more than the
100,000 pages cited by Trump.
Senate
Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY),
and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) are among those pressing for contempt measures
against Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Schumer
said, “Initiate legal actions. This is a blatant cover-up. They are
shielding Donald Trump from accountability, and the Senate has a duty to
act. The law Congress passed is crystal clear: release the Epstein
files in full so Americans can see the truth.”
A
January 7, 2020 email from a New York prosecutor said flight logs
showed Trump took eight flights on Epstein’s jet. The trips included at
least four with Ghislaine Maxwell aboard.
Maxwell
is serving a 20-year sentence for helping Epstein sexually abuse
underage girls, and the email noted that women on other flights could
have been potential witnesses in her case.
A buffoon and a crook. She
really found an administration she belonged in, didn't she. She's
missed every date on the Epstein Act so far, by the way. Jennifer White (THE HILL) reports:
The
Justice Department (DOJ) has drawn criticism for releasing only parts
of the records required by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Many
documents were heavily redacted, and some were temporarily removed. The
law, signed in November 2025, set a strict deadline of December 19,
2025.
President Donald Trump defended the rollout and said the government had provided more than 100,000 pages. However,
However,
on December 31, the DOJ admitted that it had identified approximately
5.2 million pages of records that fall under the law, far more than the
100,000 pages cited by Trump.
Senate
Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY),
and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) are among those pressing for contempt measures
against Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Schumer
said, “Initiate legal actions. This is a blatant cover-up. They are
shielding Donald Trump from accountability, and the Senate has a duty to
act. The law Congress passed is crystal clear: release the Epstein
files in full so Americans can see the truth.”
A
January 7, 2020 email from a New York prosecutor said flight logs
showed Trump took eight flights on Epstein’s jet. The trips included at
least four with Ghislaine Maxwell aboard.
Maxwell
is serving a 20-year sentence for helping Epstein sexually abuse
underage girls, and the email noted that women on other flights could
have been potential witnesses in her case.
Houston
City Council Member Edward Pollard penned a letter to the city's U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement field office Monday asking the
agency to adopt a policy that would prohibit agents from wearing face
coverings during enforcement operations and require agents to identify
themselves "as soon as reasonably practicable."
In
his letter, Pollard said the agency's tactics, like using face
coverings and lack of identification, have damaged his constituents'
trust and made encounters with law enforcement less safe.
He
cited a recent example where a father and son were pulled over by ICE
agents who started banging on their vehicle's windows. The pair fled in
fear and found refuge in a nearby store, only for agents to track them
down, allegedly tackling and beating the father.
Pollard
listed numerous benefits to implementing the policy, like lessening
confusion between ICE and local officers to avoid negative interactions
and adding a layer of prevention so residents don't try to impersonate
federal agents.
"I am a strong advocate of
having a secure border and responsible pathway to citizenship, and I am a
strong advocate for ensuring all people, regardless of background, are
afforded basic human rights and are treated with dignity and respect,"
Pollard wrote to Houston's Field Office Director Bret Bradford.
The troubles never end for Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem who overseas Chump's gestapo. David Edwards (RAW STORY) notes:
Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) officials cried foul after Hilton Hotels
refused service to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
The department expressed outrage in a Monday post on X.
"NO
ROOM AT THE INN!" the post exclaimed. "@HiltonHotels has launched a
coordinated campaign in Minneapolis to REFUSE service to DHS law
enforcement."
"When officers attempted to book rooms
using official government emails and rates, Hilton Hotels maliciously
CANCELLED their reservations," the statement continued. "This is
UNACCEPTABLE. Why is Hilton Hotels siding with murderers and rapists to
deliberately undermine and impede DHS law enforcement from their mission
to enforce our nation's immigration laws?"
Good
for Hilton. They're not Motel 6 so that probably confused Kristi
Noem. They have a higher end cliental and those consumers really aren't
going to want to stay at a place that's helping destroy lives. Sorry
for Kristi but I'm sure she knows fleabag motels across the country --
from her own experiences -- that will take anyone and probably she also
knows which ones rent by the hour.
And
one more thing there, we're not paying for them to stay in pricey
digs. Get it? We the American taxpayer are not paying for cushy suites
for the gestapo. Chump made members of the National Guard sleep on the
floor in California, but we're putting these ICE freaks up at a
Hilton? Oh, no, no, no.
We'll close with this from Senator Jack Reed's office:
WASHINGTON, DC -- In response to the Trump
Administration’s arbitrary and unscientific changes to the childhood
vaccine schedule announcement today, U.S. Senator Jack Reed (D-RI)
issued the following statement:
“It is astounding that at the same time the Trump Administration is
making health care more expensive for families it is weakening the
health of children and our communities.
“U.S. vaccine policy has long followed the science based on what
medical experts in the U.S. recommend is best for children’s health. The
Secretary of Health and Human Services is not a doctor, a public health
expert, nor a vaccine scientist. This unilateral, non-transparent
decision upends that entirely. It isn’t based on science. It will spread
confusion and disease. It will weaken public trust in health. And it
will likely increase preventable deaths of innocent children.”
Chelsea
Handler poked fun at the renaming of the John F. Kennedy Center for the
Performing Arts during the 2026 Critics Choice Awards.
"Since
the current administration has no problem renaming cultural
institutions, I would like to welcome everyone back to the Chelsea
Handler Center for the Performing Arts, formerly known as St. Jude's
Children's Hospital," Handler, 50, said shortly before introducing
Quinta Brunson to the stage at the awards show on Sunday, January 4,
earning laughs from the audience.
That's a good one. Here are some comments on the article:
Steve Coughlin
5 hours ago
Soon,
when Trump is dead, they'll be taking that horrendous name off of the
Kennedy Center, clean it up, get the smell out, and it will go back to
being a place that honors the great artists of our time.
kent bulloch
55 minutes ago
Trump
is a murderer and so is Hegseth for executing alleged "drug smugglers"
without a trial on the open sea. He is no better than Hitler for
invading Venezuela and stealing their oil. Remove his disgraceful name
from the Kennedy Center.
President
Donald Trump appointed his acolytes to oversee the John F. Kennedy
Center for the Performing Arts and immediately began looting, Sen.
Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) said in an interview with The Guardian.
“You
float stuff and you float stuff and you float stuff until people get
inured to what a stupid or outrageous thing it is that has been floated
and then you pull the trigger," Whitehouse said.
As
part of Trump's "renovations" of the Kennedy Center was ordering new
letters to put his name on the building above Kennedy's name. Much like
the Department of Defense, the name of the cultural center can only
officially be changed by Congress, which established it in law. Still,
the administration ordered the sign. Past appointees to the board were
ousted. The new Trump board did a quick vote to change the name and
within hours workers began installing Trump's name.
After
Trump's moves in November, Whitehouse and other lawmakers began a
formal investigation into accusations that the board were mismanaging
the financials of the center.
Documents Whitehouse found it is being operated as a “slush fund and private club for Trump’s friends and political allies."
“We
began to get information about mischief taking place at the Kennedy
Center and we got strong enough signals that we mounted an effort to dig
into it and see what seemed actually to be going on," said Whitehouse.
Ric Grenfell is not fit to be in charge of the Kennedy Center. Some comments on the article:
teresa mac
3 days ago
The
new party name is the Grifter Party. It's rampant now. Thank you,
Senator Whitehouse for revealing what's really taking place at the
Kennedy Center and the real reason Trump took control. I'll keep
saying there's always a hook with him. There's always some way to line
pockets, either his or those who can make sure he's "reimbursed".
not your average Joe
3 days ago
He
is finally going past the point where he can maintain his hold on the
party so they are grabbing as much as they can while they can. If the
House flips, there needs to be accountability and hopefully criminal
charges.
jack 76
3 days ago
Trump
has put the largest tax increase on consumers in history with his
tariffs. His promises of returns, investment, employment, increase in
manufacturing, and exports have not happened. He is placing his name on
everything, as if he purchased it, but everything comes with naming
royalties that will cost taxpayers long beyond Trump's life. It isn't
just the Kennedy Center; it's everything he can steal from the US.
Big Lefty
3 days ago
If
Grenell feels like Whitehouse was "Making partisan and false
accusations," then he should open up the books and prove his case. There
has been too many times in this administration where allegations are
made but not backed up by facts
John B Frank
2 days ago
Ruining
something that was once cherished by many is why Donald Trump is the
worst POTUS in history (twice), voted for by the worst people in history
(three times), a cult of poorly educated/informed,
narrow/shallow-minded people who find comfort/security in being victims
and blaming everyone/everything for their problems, problems created by
their own dysfunctional behavior and bad decision-making. Trump and his
critical mass of the blissfully ignorant are the cancer that will
destroy America from within.
Monday, January 5, 2025. In the midst of his dementia, Donald Chump
invades Venezuela and kidnaps that country's president and first lady,
though Chump did not inform Congress of what was about to take place, he
was on the phone with big oil, Cowardly Lindsey Graham put a toe
outside of his closet long enough to defend "boss" Chump, a Democrat in
Congressional leadership decided to start 2026 off demonstrating -- as
he did all last year -- that he needed to step aside and let a real
leader take over.
"Before and after." Pay attention to that in the video below.
If
you took a long holiday, let's catch you up: Nut Job Chump illegally
invaded Venezuela and kidnapped their president and first lady.
War
Criminal Chump made clear that The Nobel Peace Przie did not belong to
him and never will. He's insane, babbling through his dementia in front
of the world.
He broke international law.
"Before
and after." In the MEIDASTOUCH NEWS video above he says he consulted
"before and after"? With Congress? No, he bypassed them, he provided
them with no updates and he certainly didn't get permission from them.
He
is a threat to the world. He's no longer just stupid and dumb and
trashy. He's now completely paranoid -- that is a characteristic of
dementia -- and his mental illness really should result in him being
removed from office.
"They've stolen our property." He says that and he says, "We're going to take our oil back"
He's
talking about the oil. The oil in the ground in Venezuela. That would
be Venezuelan oil. No, they didn't steal it from the US. No, Chump is
not taking our oil back -- he's stealing from the Venezuelan people.
At
his side was pep squad leader Lindsey Graham. You know, Lindsey,
right? The gay man hiding in the closet. Laura Loomer said it. She
wasn't the first to say it.
Our professional bachelor turns 71
later this year and he's never been married but refers to a foreigner
who was a flight attendant as the great love of his life. The made up
woman apparently loved being a flight attendant more than she loved
Lindsey because she gave him up and not her job. Even in his made up,
wack job stories, Lindsey can't satisfy a woman.
—10.11.20—Responds
to LGBTQ voter asking about how his marriage to his husband and other
LGBTQ rights will be defended, Sen. Graham defends people opposed to
marriage equality as “not bigots” and “not neanderthals” and tells the
voter, “I’ve tried to be tolerant.”
—10.12.20—Opens hastened confirmation hearings of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the U.S. Supreme Court with active COVID-19 infections among Judiciary Committee members. Chairman Graham refuses
to take a COVID-19 test to ensure the safety of a debate with his
challenger or the safety of the confirmation hearings. Sen. Graham had pledged in 2016 that Supreme Court nominations should not be made in an election year. Millions of Americans are early voting in the 2020 election, and polls show Americans want the winner of the 2020 election to nominate the next Supreme Court justice. Chairman Graham asks Barrett how landmark rulings like Obergefell could be overturned.
—10.14.20—In
day three of the Barrett hearings, attempts to link the Court’s
landmark marriage equality ruling to legalizing polygamy. Chairman
Graham had also attempted this question and linkage in 2015.
—06.03.20—Signs brief
to U.S. Supreme Court to defend taxpayer-funded agency’s right to
discriminate against qualified same-sex couples looking to become foster
parents, Fulton v. City of Philadelphia.
—03.15.19—Graham
did not return a reporter’s request for comment regarding whether he,
as head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, would allow consideration of the Equality Act, offering LGBTQ people protection against discrimination in areas like public accommodations, employment, housing, and credit.
—06.17.15—Co-sponsored
the First Amendment Defense Act, which seeks to create an exemption to
nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ people by those citing a
religious-based objection to marriage equality.
—01.28.15—While
questioning Loretta Lynch during her attorney general nomination
hearing, Graham compared same-sex marriage to polygamy. “What legal
rationale would be in play that would prohibit polygamy?” he asked.
“Could you try to articulate how one could be banned under the
Constitution and the other not?”
—06.26.15—Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges,
which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, Graham released a
statement calling himself “a proud defender of traditional marriage” and
stressing his support for “religious liberty.”
—01.29.13—Graham
opposed adding same-sex couple protections to an immigration reform
bill, saying it would cause bipartisan talks to fall apart.
—11.07.13—Graham voted against the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would have prohibited employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
—06.26.13—When the Supreme Court ruled against DOMA,
Graham expressed his disappointment in the decision, saying in a
statement that he believed in “traditional marriage,” and noting he
voted for the law, as well as wrote a brief to the Court expressing his
desire to see it upheld. “One key point, today’s Supreme Court ruling
will not change South Carolina law and I will continue to fight for and
defend the traditional definition of marriage,” he added.
—12.18.10—Voted
against allowing gay and bisexual people to openly serve in the
military by opposing the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” The Senate voted in favor of the repeal, with eight of Graham’s Republican colleagues voting to repeal the discriminatory policy.
—05.18.06—Voted
for the Federal Marriage Amendment to the Constitution, and released a
statement expressing his support of the legislation, claiming it was
needed because, as he put it, “Traditional marriage is now under
attack.”
—09.13.00—argued against federal hate crime legislation, saying it was not needed and that it would “divide Americans.”
—07.29.99—Voted in favor of an amendment to prohibit same-sex couples from adopting in Washington, D.C
—05.14.96—Graham
co-sponsored the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), defining marriage as
between a man and a woman, which was signed into law in 1996.
A
70 year old man hiding in the closet? How pathetic. And worse? He's
used so much of his career to attack LGBTQ+ people in the hopes that
people won't see the truth about him. Suck a dick, Lindsey, suck a
dick.
"Before and after," Chump said. Remember? "Before and
after," he was in contact with US oil companies. But not with the US
Congress. Over the weekend, we noted various statements from members of
Congress. We're going to note those again because we're working up to a
point about leadership or the lack of it.
Senator Adam Schiff's office:
Today, Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) issued the following statement in reaction to U.S. military operations in Venezuela:
“Nicolás Maduro was a thug and an illegitimate leader of Venezuela,
terrorizing and oppressing its people for far too long and forcing many
to leave the country. But starting a war to remove Maduro doesn’t just
continue Donald Trump’s trampling of the Constitution, it further erodes
America’s standing on the world stage and risks our adversaries
mirroring this brazen illegal escalation.
“For months, as the Trump administration massed American
servicemembers and firepower in the Caribbean, and used military force
to destroy vessels and kill those on board, I and others in the Senate
forced bipartisan votes to stop the illegal misuse of our armed forces.
We warned that the true motive was not drugs, but regime change in an
oil-rich nation. Despite all of the administration’s false denials,
those motivations are now clear.
“Acting without Congressional approval or the buy-in of the public,
Trump risks plunging a hemisphere into chaos and has broken his promise
to end wars instead of starting them. And in conjunction with his
continued saber-rattling around the world and dropping approval ratings
at home, the American people should be concerned that this is not the
last time he will break that promise.
“The president has vowed that this is not the end of our engagement in Venezuela, saying that ‘we’ll be involved in it very much.’
Congress must bring up a new War Powers Resolution and reassert its
power to authorize force or to refuse to do so. We must speak for the
American people who profoundly reject being dragged into new wars.”
###
And Senator Elizabeth Warren's office issued this:
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren
(D-Mass.) released the following statement following President Trump's
military action in Venezuela:
"President Trump’s unilateral military action to attack another
country and seize Maduro — no matter how terrible a dictator he is — is
unconstitutional and threatens to drag the U.S. into further conflicts
in the region. What does it mean that the U.S. will ‘run’ Venezuela, and
what will Trump do next around the world? The American people voted for
lower costs, not for Trump’s dangerous military adventurism overseas
that won’t make the American people safer.”
###
US
House Rep Jasmine Crockett put her statement out on video. She rightly
notes in the video below we can all out Chump's actions without
glorifying Maduro.
This is from Senator Patty Murray's office:
Senator Murray: “It is outrageous for a President
who is tanking our economy here at home to suggest that the American
taxpayer spend a fortune to ‘run’ another country while doing nothing to
make life better in America. I opposed the war in Iraq from the
outset—and the parallels here are glaring. I will similarly oppose any
war in Venezuela. I refuse to put the lives of servicemembers at further
risk, and I refuse to saddle our children with yet another costly war
for no good reason.”
Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray
(D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, issued the
following statement in response to President Trump unilaterally
launching a regime change war in Venezuela, where he ordered strikes on
multiple military targets in the country and seized Nicolás Maduro of
Venezuela along with his wife Cilia Flores.
“The American people didn’t ask to start a war with
Venezuela. They didn’t ask for an indefinite and costly occupation of
another country and they didn’t ask for ‘boots on the ground,’ their
sons and daughters put in harm’s way. All they asked for were lower
prices at the grocery store. Only Congress can authorize war and I
absolutely will not support a large-scale military conflict in Venezuela
or a dangerous and expensive occupation. What the President has done is
unconstitutional, reckless, and will have far-reaching effects well
beyond last night’s strikes.
“The President has provided no legitimate justification for
these unauthorized strikes nor any kind of long-term strategy for how he
will deal with the fallout of this slapdash regime change—and he must
now explain his unhinged statements that we will ‘run’ Venezuela. The
American people can see for themselves how dishonest and cynical this
entire venture is—we’re supposed to believe drug trafficking warrants
the use of military force to topple a foreign government in one instance
and then merits a full pardon for the former President of Honduras who
was lawfully convicted of the same crime? And we should all be eyes wide
open about the potential for self-enrichment and corruption by the
Trump administration when it comes to profiting off Venezuela’s oil.
This is not about law and order, because if it were, Trump wouldn’t have
withheld these plans from Congress, and it is not about actually
helping Americans suffering from drug addiction.
“Maduro is a
corrupt and oppressive dictator—that much has always been clear. But
what stops China or Russia from making similar claims about foreign
leaders they don’t like and then using military force to overthrow them?
This kind of careless use of military force threatens serious global
instability—and none of that is good for Americans here at home.
“There needs to be serious oversight and accountability here.
Trump administration officials must come before Congress and publicly
explain their rationale and—importantly—just what exactly they think
happens next here. Republican leaders should not just shrug their
shoulders and let the President bomb whoever he wants on hardly more
than a whim—they must join Democrats in pressing for serious
accountability and insisting that the use of military force be
authorized by Congress.
“If this escalates into a prolonged conflict of any sort, you
can bet it won’t be Trump’s family putting their lives on the line—the
American people do not want to be dragged into another costly foreign
war with no real justification. It is outrageous for a President who is
tanking our economy here at home to suggest that the American taxpayer
spend a fortune to ‘run’ another country while doing nothing to make
life better in America. I opposed the war in Iraq from the outset—and
the parallels here are glaring. I will similarly oppose any war in
Venezuela. I refuse to put the lives of servicemembers at further risk,
and I refuse to saddle our children with yet another costly war for no
good reason.”
###
And this is from Senator Cory Booker's office:
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Cory Booker
(D-NJ), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, issued the
following statement:
Today, many leaders will rightly condemn President Donald Trump’s unlawful and unjust actions in Venezuela, and I join them.
But just as glaring, and far more damning, is Congress’ ongoing
abdication of its constitutional duty. For almost a year now, the
legislative branch has failed to check a president who repeatedly
violates his oath, disregards the law, and endangers American interests
at home and abroad.
Time and again, Congress, now led by Republicans, has chosen
spineless complicity over its sworn responsibilities. From the reckless
leaking of classified information that put American troops at risk, to
the illegal use of military force destroying vessels and killing people
in the Caribbean and the Pacific without congressional authorization,
there has been a stunning absence of accountability.
No hearings.
No serious investigations.
No enforcement of checks and balances.
No accountability.
Again and again, the president has exceeded his authority, defied
congressional intent, trampled the separation of powers, and broken the
law - while Congress looked away in cowardice and submission.
Republicans in Congress own this corrosive collapse of our
constitutional order. With only a handful of honorable exceptions, they
have bent themselves to the will of Donald Trump, afraid to state in
public the feelings they often communicate privately. That submission,
this abandonment of independent judgment and constitutional courage, now
stands as one of the greatest dangers to our nation and to the global
order America claims to defend.
Nicolás Maduro is a brutal dictator who has committed grave abuses.
The United States military remains the most capable fighting force on
Earth, and our praiseworthy service members carry out their orders with
professionalism and excellence.
But none of that suspends the Constitution.
The Constitution is unambiguous: Congress has the power and
responsibility to authorize the use of military force and declare war.
Congress has a duty of oversight. Congress must serve as a check, not a
rubber stamp, to the President. On this count, Congress has failed.
We face an authoritarian-minded president who acts with dangerous
growing impunity. He has shown a willingness to defy court orders,
violate the law, ignore congressional intent, and shred basic norms of
decency and democracy. This pattern will continue unless the Article I
branch of government, especially Republican congressional leadership,
finds the courage to act.
They must stop behaving as partisan puppets and start acting as patriotic constitutional stewards.
What happened today is wrong. Congressional Republicans would say so
immediately if a Democratic president had done the same. Their silence
is surrender. And in that surrender lie the seeds of our democratic
unraveling.
There are still three years left in this administration. From the
pardoning of individuals who violently attacked police officers while
attempting to overturn our election to this latest extrajudicial assault
on another nation’s sovereignty, the damage will continue unless it is
confronted.
Enough is enough.
Congress has failed. But it is not too late to redeem the harm done
by a year of submission and silence. Congress must act now. It must
reassert its constitutional authority, restore the rule of law, and stop
this president before further injury is done to our democracy and our
republic.
And I am sure there are many, many more Go to the Minority Leader of the House's website and you'll find this:
Today, House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries issued the following statement:
Nicolas Maduro is a criminal and authoritarian dictator who has
oppressed the people of Venezuela for years. He is not the legitimate
head of government. Undoubtedly, the rule of law and democracy have
broken down in Venezuela and the people of that country deserve better.
Donald
Trump has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and
protect democratic norms in the United States. That is what putting
America First requires.
The Trump administration has not sought
congressional authorization for the use of military force and has failed
to properly notify Congress in advance of the operation in Venezuela.
The promotion of security and stability in a region requires more than
just military force as we painfully discovered in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Far
too many questions remain unanswered, including with respect to whether
further military actions are planned. First, how many American troops
remain on the ground in Venezuela? Second, what does America is going to
run Venezuela until a judicious transition takes place mean? Third,
were these military strikes about seizing foreign oil to benefit friends
of the Trump administration? Fourth, why did Donald Trump pardon the
former Honduran President, a narco trafficker convicted in an American
court of law, but is willing to take us to war in Venezuela in
connection with similar allegations?
Pursuant to the
Constitution, the framers gave Congress the sole power to declare war as
the branch of government closest to the American people. The House and
Senate must be briefed immediately and compelling evidence to explain
and justify this unauthorized use of military force should be presented
forthwith.
###
But
you know where you won't find a statement? The Senate Minority Leader's
site. Go to Chuck Schumer's site right now and Venezuela wasn't
invaded, Nothing happened. In fact, nothing happened in the country
since December 15th when his office issued "SCHUMER
ANNOUNCES WHOLE MILK FOR HEALTHY KIDS ACT HAS PASSED CONGRESS & IS
ON ITS WAY TO BECOMING LAW TO BRING MORE MILK FROM UPSTATE NY DAIRY
FARMS TO SCHOOL CAFETERIAS ACROSS AMERICA." That's not leadership.
21
days and he's issued nothing while holding the title of Democratic
Party leader of the Senate. He needs to step down. He's repeatedly
failed as a leader and he can't even do the bare minimum. 'I don't like
him' or "he doesn't do enough for Gaza' are the sort of whines the
ineffective on the left offer for Schumer. The reality is, he's not
leading. Forget what the issue is, he's not leading. He wants the year
book credit but he doesn't want to do the work. And that's why he
needs to be forced aside and retired from leadership. He's worthless
and he's been that way for a long, long time. It has nothing to do with
whatever your pet issue of the moment is. It has to do that throughout
2025, from one crisis to another, he never offered leadership and he
never stood up. Now, I'm not calling for him to step down from the
Senate. The voters can decide when that needs to happen. I am saying
he needs to be kicked out of leadership immediately. He's been coward
through 2025 and that enabled Chump, tht allowed him to get away with so
much. It's time for real leadership and that's not Chuck.
The day after the United States carried out an illegal military attack
on Venezuela and kidnapped its president, Nicolás Maduro, the Trump
administration unleashed a torrent of threats against countries on every
inhabited continent, targeting not only Latin America, but North
America, Europe and Asia.
In remarks to The Atlantic on
Sunday, President Trump threatened Venezuelan Vice President Delcy
Rodríguez, who was sworn in as acting president on Saturday, with a fate
“worse” than that of Maduro.
“If she doesn’t do what’s right, she is going to pay a very big price,” Trump said. “Probably bigger than Maduro.”
Trump’s
threat against Rodríguez came just hours after he had claimed at
Saturday’s press conference that she had agreed to cooperate with US
demands. Her public statements have been defiant, denouncing the US
operation as “a barbarity” and calling Maduro Venezuela’s “only
president.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, appearing on
NBC’s “Meet the Press,” suggested that Cuba would be the next target of
US military operations.
When asked whether Cuba was the
Trump administration’s “next target,” Rubio replied: “The Cuban
government is a huge problem.” Pressed again, he said: “They are in a
lot of trouble, yes.”
Trump went even further, renewing his threat to annex Greenland, a territory of Denmark and a NATO ally of the United States.
For
those paying attention, this is how world wars begin. And it's why you
don't put an unemployable TV 'personality' into the White House. AFP notes:
The prime minister of Denmark on Sunday called on President Trump to
"stop the threats" about taking over Greenland after the U.S. president
reiterated his wish to take over the Danish territory.
Since
returning to White House a year ago, Mr. Trump has repeatedly claimed
that making Greenland part of the United States would serve U.S.
national security interests, given its strategic location in the Arctic.
Greenland is also rich in key critical minerals used in high-tech
sectors.
In an interview with The Atlantic magazine published Sunday, Mr. Trump reiterated his wish to take over Greenland.
"We do need Greenland, absolutely. We need it for defense," he told the magazine.
Later
that night, Mr. Trump again told reporters aboard Air Force One, "We
need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is
not going to be able to do it."
Like Hitler,
Chump's not buttered by rule of law and certainly not by international
law. He's a blood thirsty dictator suffering from dementia on a holy
tear and the world has to stand up to him. Again, there's no legal
basis for what he did. What he ordered the US military to do was
illegal. Joel Abrams (THE CONVERSATION) explains:
The legitimacy of the Maduro regime has also been called into question. There were disputed election outcomes in 2018 and 2024.
However, the legitimacy or otherwise of the Maduro regime is not a legal basis for a military intervention.
Rather, the Trump administration is relying on US domestic laws to justify its actions in Venezuela. A 2020 US grand jury indictment of Maduro and his wife for drug trafficking underpins the legal argument.
Mr. Trump’s actions on Saturday cast America back to a past era of gunboat diplomacy, when the United States used its military to grab territory and resources for its own benefit.
A
year ago this week, he openly mused, also at Mar-a-Lago, about making
Canada, Greenland and Panama parts of the United States. Now, after
hanging in the White House a portrait of William McKinley, the
tariff-loving president who presided over the military seizure of the
Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico, Mr. Trump said it was well within the
rights of the United States to wrest from Venezuela resources that he
believes had been wrongly taken from the hands of American corporations.
The
U.S. operation, in seeking to assert control over a vast Latin American
nation, has little precedent in recent decades, recalling the imperial
U.S. military efforts of the 19th and early 20th centuries in Mexico,
Nicaragua and other countries.
Mr.
Trump and his aides claimed they had a legal basis for the immediate
action he ordered on Friday, the extraterritorial rendition of Mr.
Maduro. An indictment that dates to 2020 charged the Venezuelan leader
with a series of acts related to drug trafficking. A refreshed
indictment was published Saturday, one that included Mr. Maduro’s wife, Cilia Flores.
But that indictment only deals with Mr. Maduro’s alleged crimes. It did
not provide a legal basis for taking control of the country, as the U.S.
president declared he was
Hitler started with Austria, Chump started with Venezuela.
I'd hoped to include Epstein news but we're already running long.