Thursday, July 23, 2026

Destiny's Child, Christina Aguilera, Ethan Browne and the non-pregnant Jason Aldean

Destiny's Child will soon have a new release.  Charisma Madarang (ROLLING STONE) reports

Mathew Knowles just spilled that Destiny's Child are coming out with a lineup of new remixes and they're releasing in the next … 30 days.

"We're about to market a bunch of new remixes, some you've never heard before," Knowles, Beyoncé's father who managed the trio, told SiriusXM's Page Six Radio on July 22. While Knowles didn't specify if the new tracks would be part of an album, he did reveal that the new music would arrive in the "next 30 days."
"We have a number of remixes that have never been released, and we'll be putting those out soon," said Knowles. "We have some guest rappers on it, but it's the girls on them. And then there's some that are dance mixes, and then there's some that are just regular urban mixes. So there's a combination. We have so much music that hadn't been put out yet on Destiny's Child."

When asked if there would be any rappers featured among the remixes, Knowles teased, "Missy Elliot. She's on one of them. Perhaps on the brink of unveiling more, he suddenly caught himself and said, "Ah, I'll stop."

Now moving over to Jason Aldean.  No, Jason's not pregnant, he's just packing on more weight.  And probably more hate, knowing him.  Clay Halton (MONEYWISE) reports:

Country music stars Luke Bryan and Jason Aldean are facing a legal battle (1) after the sudden closure of their Nashville steakhouse.

A real estate company, Village 21 Investment Partners LLC, is suing Bryan, Aldean and former Major League Baseball player Adam LaRoche for more than $1.4 million after their restaurant, E3 Chophouse Nashville, allegedly stopped paying rent and shut its doors earlier this year.
The restaurant, which opened in 2019 in Nashville’s Hillsboro Village neighborhood, announced in June (2) that it was “hitting pause” while it evaluated future opportunities and potential rebranding plans. The company described the closure as temporary.
But according to court filings, the landlord sees things differently. Village 21 alleges (3) that E3 Chophouse stopped paying monthly rent before abruptly closing in February, triggering a default under the lease agreement. The company is seeking unpaid rent, interest, legal costs and additional damages tied to the remaining lease term.


Jason, you probably already know, eats a lot.  There are probably rumors that the place shut down because he'd eaten a full week's worth of steaks in one sitting.  He's a big one, isn't he?  And, again, not pregnant, just fat.  



New details have emerged about the circumstances surrounding the death of actor and model Ethan Browne, the son of songwriter Jackson Browne.

The Los Angeles Medical Examiner's full autopsy report exclusively obtained by Us on Wednesday, July 22, reveals the scene that medical personnel discovered when they arrived at the 52-year-old's Culver City residence.
Ethan was found unresponsive in his bedroom by his roommate on November 25, 2025, at approximately 8:24 a.m., according to the report.

When paramedics arrived, they discovered Ethan holding a straw and lighter in his hand with several narcotics, drug paraphernalia and medications littered throughout his bedroom.
"A glass pipe with crystalline substance and brown residue along with a burnt piece of aluminum foil were found on the nightstand" next to his body. Vaping devices, "whip-it" cartridges and "multiple prescription medications" were found at the scene.

The report also noted that the medical personnel discovered a box on Ethan's bed "which contained apparent illicit drugs and paraphernalia." They declared him dead at the scene.
His roommate recounted his last moments with Ethan, revealing he "seemed off" and was "possibly under the influence of drugs" at around 8 p.m. the night before his death.

Ethan was last known to be alive at 10:30 p.m. when he went to bed.


Christina Aguilera brought the glamour to the Big Apple when she made a surprise performance at the star-studded Michelob ULTRA FIFA World Cup Final Round Private VIP Party at The Boom Boom at the top of The Standard, High Line in New York City on July 19th. Check out a video here. 
The Burlesque star, 45, has been turning heads with her glamorous outfits over the past few months, including a semi-sheer dress at the opening ceremony for the Obama Presidential Center last month. And her appearance at this event, which was held to celebrate the end of the FIFA World Cup tournament, was the latest look to render fans speechless.
Xtina's performance at the private party didn't disappoint, as she performed iconic hits including "Lady Marmalade," "Ain't No Other Man," and "Express."

I don't understand Christina.  BURLESQUE made money and, after it left theaters, really became huge.  She and Cher are both great in it.  I don't understand why she didn't have other worthy film offers.  


Closing with C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"

Thursday, July 23, 2026.  An Epstein associate turns up dead, the price of oil per barrel soars, Chump continues his war on Iran and the American economy, and much more. 





Iranian attacks on nine U.S. locations across the Middle East in the two weeks since the cease-fire broke down show that the country maintains an ability to inflict damage on precise targets, despite the Trump administration’s repeated claims that Iran’s military capabilities have been diminished or destroyed.

A New York Times visual analysis of U.S. military bases and other sites found the strikes have caused damage to living quarters and working areas, drone shelters, radar systems and other structures.

One of the attacks, on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, killed three U.S. soldiers and wounded others. A military official told The Times that nearly a dozen troops were also wounded severely enough by Iranian missile and drone attacks in Jordan and other countries this month that they were flown to a U.S. military hospital in Germany for treatment.


And the price of oil is climbing.  Steve Kopack (NBC NEWS) reports:

The price of oil surged nearly 5% on Wednesday as U.S. officials talked down the chance of new peace talks after an 11th straight night of strikes on Iran and with major disruption now facing two of the world’s key supply routes.

International Brent crude oil rose almost 5% to more than $95 per barrel for the first time in almost six weeks. U.S. crude oil rose more than 4% to more than $88 per barrel.
While Brent is widely considered the international oil benchmark, it also influences U.S. gas prices.

Those pump prices rose again Wednesday, extending their climb above $4. The national average price per gallon rose 5 cents from Tuesday to $4.06 per gallon, according to AAA data tracked by NBC News.


Leo Sands (NYT) adds, "The price of oil surged to $98 a barrel on Thursday morning, as Iran’s Houthi allies in Yemen claimed strikes on two Saudi tankers in the Red Sea, and neither the United States nor Iran showed any letup in their fighting."  98 dollars a barrel.  And when he started this war of choice,  he claimed it would only last days. 



Desi Lydic: You might remember back in March when President Trump quickly launched his quick war in Iran and conservative media told you how quick it was quickly going to go 

THE DAILY SHOW then offered a clip fest of TV MAGAs repeatedly claiming that the war was over and over.  


No, this is not what Chump promised as Steve Benen (MS NOW) reminds:

Around this time two years ago, then-candidate Donald Trump seemed to recognize the political potency of energy prices as a campaign issue, which led the Republican to make some rather specific promises.

“We intend to slash prices by half within 12 months, at a maximum 18 months,” he said in August 2024. Trump went on to claim, “We’re looking to cut them in half, and we think we’ll be able to do better … You will never have had energy so low as you will under a certain gentleman known as Donald J. Trump. Have you heard of him? So we think your energy bills will be down by 50% to 70%. How good would that be?”

In theory, it would have been quite good indeed. But this week, his presidency hit the 18-month mark, and it’s clear that he’s failed spectacularly to deliver on his promise.

That's all Chump ever offered: Empty and meaningless words from a serial liar.  



President Donald Trump’s net approval rating has hit its lowest level ever, according to a new poll.

The survey, conducted by the American Research Group between July 16 and 20, revealed that a total of 30 percent of Americans approved of Trump’s handling of his job as president, while 67 percent disapproved. This gave Trump a net approval rating of -37 percent, his lowest rating yet.

 

And even MAGA is catching on.  Megan Messerly (POLITICO) reports:

Half of President Donald Trump’s MAGA base thought the Iran war was worth its economic costs in May. Now, just a little more than a third do.

That precipitous, 13-point drop in just two months, according to a new POLITICO Poll, reveals how the president’s most die-hard supporters are starting to agree with the majority of Americans who have long opposed the U.S.’ involvement in the war.
Additionally, 37 percent of self-identified MAGA Trump voters say the U.S. should continue its involvement only if it doesn’t increase costs, up from 29 percent who said the same in May, according to the survey, conducted by independent polling firm Public First. Nearly 1 in 5 MAGA voters believe that the U.S. should end its war in Iran, regardless of the costs.


Survey analyst G. Elliot Morris reports voters aren’t falling for President Donald Trump’s scheme to blame oil companies for high prices. They know it’s the president’s fault — and they think we’re here because he’s nuts.

The national average price of gasoline is back above $4 a gallon as fighting with Iran resumed in recent weeks, reports Morris. Rather than haggle out a lasting peace accord for the war Trump started, Trump’s response has been a well-lauded proposal to hunt down price-gougers with a probe of oil companies, despite oil companies warning Trump what his Middle Eastern aggression would do to prices.
“Polls suggest voters aren’t buying the ruse,” said Morris. “In our latest Strength In Numbers/Verasight poll, fielded July 14–17, 51 percent of Americans say Trump and his administration are most responsible for the price of gas right now, whereas 12 percent put the blame primarily on oil and gas companies.”


Behaving erratically and coming off unhinged, Chump has earned a reputation.  Kathrine Frich (DAGENS) reports:

When a former leader returns to power, voters watch closely to see if the second act matches the promises.

A year and a half into this sequel, public opinion has started to solidify.

A newly released survey asked citizens to sum up the commander-in-chief, and the top choice is stark.
According to YouGov polling cited by Daily Express, most Americans choose the word “dangerous” to describe Donald Trump.

Fifty-two per cent of respondents picked that exact term. The numbers do not improve much from there.
These divides arrive at a truly difficult moment. The president is sitting at a negative 24 per cent net approval rating.

That figure is worse than his polling numbers at the exact same point in his first term.

Voters are frustrated by recent controversies, including the sluggish release of the Epstein files. Global living costs have also skyrocketed amid the Iran conflict.

And on the topic of oil and our serial liar, what about Venezuela?  Will Neal (DAILY BEAST) reports:

Donald Trump is facing intense scrutiny over the billions his administration has raked in from Venezuela that now appear to have vanished into thin air.

Analysis by the Financial Times suggests the White House has brought in $13 billion from Venezuelan oil sales so far after capturing despot Nicolas Maduro in January and installing vice president Delcy Rodriguez in his place.
The raid saw the U.S. seize control of oil exports in Venezuela, which account for as much as 25 percent of the country’s GDP.

Trump, 80, also eased sanctions against the regime, which the FT notes was “expected to provide a major boost” to Venezuela’s economy, which was struggling “even before last month’s devastating earthquakes.”

The White House has been unclear on the oil money. An executive order said any oil funds would remain Venezuelan property, and be held in U.S. accounts in a “custodial capacity.”
But Trump has said the U.S. is “making a lot of money” from Venezuelan oil, and the U.S. Department of Energy has said the funds “will be disbursed for the benefit of the American people and the Venezuelan people.”

Economists told the newspaper that any evidence of a recovery in Venezuela six months after Maduro’s capture remains “relatively muted,” suggesting a significant share of the $13 billion seized by the U.S. may not have made its way back to the country.
“Trump’s invasion of Venezuela has been about oil, power, and graft from the very beginning, with billions of dollars in Venezuelan oil revenue being controlled by the Trump administration without transparency or safeguards,” Democratic Rep. Joaquin Castro, 51, told the FT.

Malcolm Ferguson (THE NEW REPUBLIC) observes, "It seems clear that the most corrupt president in history is withholding oil revenue from Venezuelans who badly need it, as oil makes up nearly a quarter of the entire country’s GDP. In January, Semafor reported that Trump would be keeping proceeds from the first $500 million sale of Venezuelan oil in an offshore bank account based in Qatar. It might be worth checking up on that account."  Back in June, Roxanna Vigil sounded the alarm at the Council on Foreign Relations:

In the first four months of the United States exerting control over Venezuela’s oil exports, almost one hundred million barrels of oil worth an estimated $8 billion have flowed through a process marked by no transparency and minimal oversight. While the Trump administration has repeatedly framed this control as benefiting both countries, it has not publicly disclosed how much Venezuelan oil it has sold, how much revenue it has collected, or how it has used those funds since seizing control of the country’s oil exports following the January 3 military intervention that deposed Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro.
Based on tanker-tracking data from Bloomberg and reports on discounts applied to Venezuelan crude, the estimated value of U.S.-controlled oil exports has increased from $600 million in January (about 380,000 barrels per day) to about $3.7 billion in April alone (about 1.1 million barrels per day). The largest recipients of Venezuelan oil since January 3 have been the United States (43 percent), India (26 percent), and Spain (8 percent).

[. . .]

Venezuela’s state-owned oil and gas company, known as PDVSA, has not published oil revenue figures since 2016, and the Trump administration has not publicly disclosed the exact figures it controls. It is also unclear who within the administration oversees those funds. Trump said he would control the revenue when he announced the first fifty-million-barrel tranche on social media just days after Maduro’s ouster. However, Executive Order 14373, which establishes Foreign Government Deposit Funds as property of the Venezuelan government held in custody by the Treasury Department, indicates that the secretary of state will give the Treasury instructions for disbursements.

Except for a few details shared with Congress and in Executive Order 14373, the Trump administration has provided almost no information on the system it has established to sell Venezuelan oil, collect the revenue, and use the funds. The administration has also not released the written agreements it has entered into with the Venezuelan government, traders, buyers, banks, and other entities involved in the process. Both Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent separately committed to Congress to share a copy of the written agreements governing U.S. control of Venezuelan oil exports, though it is unclear whether those copies were delivered to Congress, and no copies have been made public.

Despite Rubio’s insistence before Congress that commodities trading companies Trafigura and Vitol were a “short-term fix” to quickly sell the first tranche of oil, both companies—each of which has a history of bribery schemes related to oil sales—remain involved in Venezuela five months later. A third trader, GE Warren, has since entered the picture, and the Trump administration has offered no explanation for their ongoing role. In mid-April, the State Department witness told Congress that accounting firm KPMG would conduct quarterly audits of how Venezuelan oil revenues are being spent, to include a retrospective audit “from the beginning,” but said he did not know when the reports would be available.


Chump's war on Iran continues the destruction of the US economy that Chump began with his ill advised tariffs.  Jobs are not being created.  This topic was addressed yesterday on USA TODAY's podcast THE EXCERPT:

Dana Taylor:  The unemployment rate fell in June and normally that's good news, but economists are saying - not so fast. The US added just 57,000 jobs in June while previous months were revised down. Also, the labor force participation rate fell.  In other words, the job market may look steadier on paper than it really is. Hello and welcome to USA TODAY's The Excerpt. I'm Dana Taylor. Today is Wednesday, July 22nd, 2026. Here to dig into the numbers and explain what's really going on is USA TODAY Money Reporter Rachel Barber. It's so good to have you here, Rachel.

Rachel Barber:  Yes, thanks for having me, Dana.

Dana Taylor:  So let's start with the basic tension in this latest jobs report. The unemployment rate fell in June, but economists say that may have happened for the wrong reasons. Why?

Rachel Barber:  So the unemployment rate, if you break it down, is really just a function of how many people are unemployed that would like to be employed. And so what economists are saying is given the fact that the labor force participation rate fell, which the labor force participation rate is just a fancy way of saying the percent of people 16 and older who are looking for work or working, saying because that fell, the unemployment rate dropping from 4.3 to 4.2 percent is most likely more so a function of the fact that people have just stopped applying for jobs rather than the fact that a lot of people are getting hired. So that's a troubling sign in what would usually be considered a bright spot in this jobs report.

Dana Taylor:  Rachel, I mentioned that the US added just 57,000 jobs in June or previous months were revised down. Just how weak is that number?

Rachel Barber:  So when you compare it to other months this year, the US has added well over 100,000 jobs. In the prior three months, for example, we saw negative job growth or job losses in February, but every other month this year has been positive. But when you compare it back to 2025, for example, the US added only 181,000 jobs over the entire year.  So in a way, this is kind of on track or even a little bit of an improvement from the averages we saw last year, but also last year was a historically weak year for hiring in the United States. So kind of depends on your timeline, but for the most part, this is a weak print.



The number of Americans not working has climbed to a record high under President Donald Trump.

According to figures from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the ranks of Americans classified as “not in the labor force” (NILF) swelled to 105.8 million in June, marking the highest level ever recorded.

That means the total number of Americans classified as “not in the labor force” is now higher than it was during the Great Recession or the COVID-19 pandemic.
The category includes everyone age 16 and older who is not working, from retirees and students to people who have stopped looking for a job.

About 5.3 million Americans—roughly 5 percent of the total—are no longer searching for work because they have become discouraged. Another 23.3 million, or around 22 percent, are out of the workforce due to long-term illness, disability, or other benefit programs.
[. . .]
The economy added just 57,000 jobs in June—barely half of the 115,000 economists had expected. The Labor Department also sharply revised previous figures lower, reporting 31,000 fewer jobs were created in April and another 43,000 fewer in May than originally estimated.

One of the biggest drags came from the leisure and hospitality sector, which lost 61,000 jobs in June instead of ramping up for the busy summer travel season.

Yesterday on MS NOW's MONEY POWER POLITICS WITH STEPHANIE RUHLE, the topic of tariffs was addressed as well as today's economy. 


As Stephanie pointed out, manufacturing jobs are decreasing under Chump and Hugh Cameron (NEWSWEEK) notes:


President Donald Trump’s administration is taking credit for a manufacturing “renaissance” in the United States, though data on employment gains since he returned to office last January tell a less triumphant story.

Reviving and restoring America’s migrating manufacturing base was one of the marquee pledges of Trump’s successful 2024 campaign. And this aim has been used as a justification for many of his policies, notably tariffs but also his signature tax legislation—the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA)—that was signed last July.
[. . .]
But despite this conviction, payroll figures from the Department of Labor tell a slightly different story, with manufacturing employment having declined by 75,000 roles since his inauguration, compared to significant gains made under his predecessor.
[. . .]
Other industry groups have blamed the legislation for wiping out jobs in many sectors, such as the pro-clean energy advocacy group E2, which in a recent analysis estimated that this had cost the country nearly half a million jobs and hundreds of billions of dollars in energy investments and tax revenue since being signed into law.

And payroll figures from the Department of Labor likewise show that manufacturing employment has declined rather than improved since Trump returned to office. The economy added around 3,000 manufacturing roles last month, though this modest gain is one of the few positive readings over the past year and a half.

All told, the economy has lost 75,000 manufacturing roles between January 2025 and June of this year. 




Turning to Todd Blanche, America's acting Attorney General who wants to become Attorney General so badly that he's apparently saying whatever he thinks his listener wants to hear in private. Jennifer Bendery (HUFFINGTON POST) reports:

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche is disputing he told Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) that he “made a mistake” by creating a $1.7 billion slush fund for payouts to people claiming they were wronged by the government, like Jan. 6, 2021 rioters.

Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, shared this tidbit with reporters last Tuesday, right after a meeting with Blanche. He and a top aide, who attended the private meeting with Blanche, even said it was a direct quote.
But in his written responses to follow-up questions from the committee, where he’s awaiting a vote to be confirmed to his post, Blanche denied Friday that he said that.

“In our meeting this week, you said, ‘I made a mistake’ by creating this slush fund,” Durbin asked in his written questions. “Do you stand by this characterization of this slush fund?”

“I contest the accuracy of this statement,” Blanche replied.

Claude Wooten (2PARAGRAPHS) reports on Blanche's interaction with another US senator:

President Trump’s acting Attorney General Todd Blanche repeatedly refused to answer written questions posed by U.S. Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) regarding the development of the Department of Justice’s $1.776 Billion “anti-weaponization” fund. Along with other inquiries, Tillis asked who was involved and who determined the amount of the fund.
[. . .]
Political scientist Norman Ornstein, an emeritus scholar at the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., replied: “Blanche is daring @SenThomTillis to vote against him. It is a real test of Tillis's spine and moral character. He knows full well how utterly unqualified and dangerous Blanche is. If he provides the vote to confirm this monster, that will be the act that defines his public service.”


Blanche appeared Wednesday of last week before Durbin, Tillis and other members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. It did not go well.  His efforts to clarify issues since have also not gone well.  Also not going well?  His efforts to avoid the judge's ruling in Katie Phang's case.   Henry Giardina (QUEERTY) reports

Journalist Katie Phang has stayed on the DOJ’s neck since the first Epstein file release. This April, she filed suit against Todd Blanche for failing to release the files in exact accordance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The suit wasn’t only about the estimated 3 million Epstein files that remain under wraps: it called out the shocking redactions made seemingly without any motivation other than helping Tr*mp keep his reputation afloat.
Now, less than a month after Phang won her case, we’re finally getting some answers around Blanche and the FBI’s role in redacting the names of powerful men in the files, while leaving victims exposed and vulnerable to attack.
It should surprise exactly no one to learn that in training videos created to guide FBI agents through the redaction process, protecting Tr*mp was detailed as the most important priority in blacking out identifying names.

On a new episode of Phang’s podcast on the MeidasTouch network, Phang interviews The Daily Beans journalist Alison Gill about the recently-unearthed training tapes, and exactly who and what they were meant to protect.
Speaking with her sources inside the bureau, Gill confirms that the training videos exist both on the classified FBI channel BeauTube and on an open, accessible site. In both cases, insiders confirmed something interesting.

“The very first instructions [to the FBI] was to hide Tr*mp and other politically popular peoples’ names,” Gill says.

Not very good news for Blanche, Tr*mp, or anyone involved in the cover-up. According to Gill, this guidance didn’t sit well with certain FBI analyists, who actually do care about victims’ safety. But their concerns apparently were not taken into consideration. Instead of being told to focus on keeping Epstein survivors and victims protected, workers in the FBI’s information management division were coached to “find, log, and redact D*n*ld Tr*mp’s name.”

This tedious work involved creating two separate spreadsheet databases detailing when, where, and in what context Tr*mp’s name showed up allegedly over 1 million times in the files.




Blanche is facing major pushback on his nomination including from Epstein survivors.  Peter Charalambous and Lauren Peller (ABC NEWS) report:

Two dozen survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's alleged abuse are again urging Republican Sens. Thom Tillis and John Cornyn to vote against confirming Todd Blanche as attorney general. 

In a letter to both senators, the group said that Blanche's recent meeting with Epstein victims was nothing more than "a box-checking exercise arranged only after his confirmation was put at risk."
"Survivors received an hour of deflection, interruption and gaslighting," the letter said. "Todd Blanche showed no remorse for the horrific release of materials that exposed survivors' identities and images. He also gave no indication that he believed there were investigative leads worth pursuing, or that he intended to seek accountability beyond Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell."
Sen. Tillis last week required Blanche to meet with the victims to secure his vote, and Blanche met with them late Thursday at the Department of Justice. Blanche described the meeting as "productive" -- saying he encouraged them to provide any information that could support an investigation -- but acknowledged they conveyed "frustration" with the process. 


Some senators may vote for him just because of their own ties to the Epstein class.  Take Susan Collins who has a long history of siding with Epstein.  Troy Matthews (MEIDASTOUCH NEWS) reports


Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) accepted campaign donations from known Jeffrey Epstein associates, while taking legislative action to block the release of the Epstein files. More names of Collins' donors with Epstein ties have been identified since the first MeidasTouch report.

In September of 2025, Collins accepted a $10,000 donation from Epstein associate Casey Wasserman, including $7,000 to her campaign committee and $3,000 to Dirigo PAC, a political action committee sponsored by Collins. Wasserman also hosted a Hollywood fundraiser for Collins.
Wasserman was forced to sell his business after his close friendship with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell became public. Wasserman had taken multiple flights with Epstein and exchanged emails of a sexual nature to Maxwell, saying among other things, "I think of you all the time. So, what do I have to do to see you in a tight leather outfit?"

In another email, Maxwell asked Wasserman whether it will be foggy enough during an upcoming visit "so that you can float naked down the beach and no one can see you unless they are close up?"
Collins also accepted $2,800 from Epstein associate Leon Black. Black resigned as CEO of Apollo Global Management due to his relationship with Epstein. Black and Jeffrey Epstein knew each other for decades, “Often socialized and dined together,” and Black was a lucrative client for Epstein until Epstein’s death.
Black was accused of sexual assault by a woman interviewed by the FBI and federal prosecutors as part of investigations into potential co-conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein, but denied any wrongdoing. Black described his relationship with Epstein as one largely limited to tax strategy, estate planning and philanthropic advice.



A French professional model recruiter who for over a decade arranged for the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to meet multiple models, was found dead at his home near Paris on Monday.

Daniel Siad’s body was found in his house in Colombes, a suburb of the French capital, Marie-CĂ©line Lawrysz, deputy public prosecutor at the Nanterre Judicial Court, told CNN in a Wednesday statement.
An autopsy will be performed on the body to determine the cause of death.






Daniel Siad, 69, was reportedly under investigation by French prosecutors for trafficking tied to the late sex offender and for separate allegations of sexual crimes.
His attorney, Menya Arab-Tigrine, told ABC News that Siad's death was discovered by the sister of a neighbor. The attorney said she believed Siad had suffered a heart attack but was waiting for an official report.

Siad's name appears more than 2,000 times in records released by the U.S. Justice Department in response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act. His correspondence with Epstein often contained references to young women he had scouted -- in Sweden, Eastern Europe and elsewhere -- that he thought would be of interest to Epstein.
[. . .]
Siad's death comes less than a week after the BBC published a detailed story about an alleged Epstein victim, who was identified by the pseudonym "Anya." According to the article, Anya had alleged that Siad had introduced her to Epstein, which she claimed led to years of manipulation and abuse by Epstein.

She described Siad as "essentially a professional trafficker," according to the BBC.





Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche is withholding foreign-language Epstein documents that could be used to bring new charges against convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, a legal analyst warned.

Former MS NOW anchor and attorney Katie Phang — who personally sued Blanche over Epstein file compliance and won a court order forcing him to act — made the accusation on her YouTube channel.

Her analysis was prompted by the death of modeling scout Daniel Siad, 69, found dead Monday at his home in the Paris suburb of Colombes, BBC News reported.

Siad was under French investigation for allegedly helping run Epstein's international sex trafficking network. French authorities had never interviewed him before he died, BBC News reported. Phang argued his death made the Justice Department's handling of the case more urgent, not less.
"The passage of time is hurting the ability to prosecute these cases," she explained in a broadcast on Wednesday.


Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:


***WATCH: Senator Murray’s full opening remarks***

Washington, D.C. — Today, at a Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee (SVAC) hearing on the future of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) research—U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a former chair and senior member of SVAC, delivered the following opening remarks.

Senator Murray’s remarks, as delivered, are below:

“Look, I think Senators on both sides of this aisle have a real appreciation of VA’s research enterprise, which has been at the forefront of cutting-edge science for more than 100 years, it’s led to breakthroughs like the pacemaker, the first successful liver transplant, the nicotine patch, and CT scanning. 

“But I am not sure that the Trump administration has that same appreciation. And I am very concerned the actions by this administration have demoralized VA research staff, and have created instability in research funding, and put up barriers that has slowed the research process.

“On the very first day of the Trump Administration, all VA research staff became subject to a hiring freeze and probationary firings. As a result – research at the Pittsburgh VA to predict stroke risk was put on hold, enrollment into clinical trials for advanced cancer was delayed, and a clinical trial in Florida on preventing dementia and heart disease was cancelled.

“And look, Mr. Chairman, I could go on. I have heard a lot of stories like that.

“The Department also enforced vacancy cuts and staffing caps on its facilities. Though these cuts technically exclude research staff, a study at a VA site in the Pacific Northwest was delayed because staffing caps prevented them from hiring nurses who were needed to administer that study.

“These workforce actions have also taken a toll on employees at VA’s Central Office responsible for getting new research studies up and running.

“VA researchers now report startup times for their studies often stretch to more than a year. Those delays are partially due to a wildly inefficient hiring process for VA research staff. Researchers are reporting to us that the time to hire a new member of their staff now often takes up to six months. As a result, a planned study on RSV missed its enrollment window and could not even enroll participants. Another clinical trial closed after it took six months to hire a researcher. The study’s principal investigator and its lead clinician both resigned from the VA after this debacle.

“VA researchers are not only being undermined by delays and cuts at the Department, but also by instability and cuts at other federal agencies like the National Institutes of Health, which frequently provides funding for our VA researchers. For example, a VA researcher’s NIH grant for studying opioid use disorder among minority veterans was cancelled—why? Because it was deemed ‘DEI-related.’

“Large VA research sites are also reporting their non-VA federal funding is down one-third or more compared to the previous year.

“And in one final blow to research, the Office of Management and Budget published a proposed rule that would require all federal grants, including those for VA research, to be approved by political appointees. That doesn’t make sense—let the political appointees overrule the scientist on what research is worth pursuing and funding.

“Given the current state of VA research under this administration – there is a demoralized workforce with limited access to non-VA federal funding – so it is really inexplicable to request a decrease in funding for VA research for fiscal year 2027.

“I am speaking here in place of Senator Blumenthal, but I can tell you right now as Vice Chair of Appropriations it is my intention to rip up Trump’s budget up and write a new one.

“I really hope our VA witnesses will take the concerns raised in this hearing seriously and commit to taking action to address them. If VA wants to ensure it can recruit and retain the brightest minds to conduct research and provide clinical care for our nation’s heroes, it has to work to restore the trust it has lost with many of its research staff.

“This committee and this congress should stand up for research. And it should stand up for science. And it should stand up for veterans—that’s where I am, Mr. Chairman.”

###







Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Cher, Steve Miller Band, Joni Mitchell, Ben Folds, Diana Ross



Cher will have to pay her own million-dollar legal fees after a lengthy court battle with the widow of her late ex-husband, Sonny Bono. 
Court documents obtained by PEOPLE on Tuesday, July 21, show that a federal judge has ordered the 80-year-old “After All” singer to cover the attorney’s fees that she “incurred in the successful prosecution of this action against defendant Mary Bono.”

Mary, the 64-year-old former California congresswoman, married the late former United States Representative in 1986. The couple remained married until his fatal skiing accident on Jan. 5, 1998.
Sonny & Cher, whose real names are Salvatore Phillip “Sonny” Bono and Cheryl Sarkisian, were not only a popular music duo, but husband and wife from 1964 until 1975.

In October 2021, Cher filed a complaint against Mary seeking $1 million in damages. 

At the time, the Grammy winner alleged that rights and royalties from the songs Cher and Sonny recorded as a duo, including “I Got You Babe” and “The Beat Goes On,” were being withheld from Cher.
Cher was entitled to 50% as a part of her 1978 divorce agreement with Sonny, but argued in her complaint that Mary allegedly attempted to use a “wholly inapplicable statutory termination provision of the Copyright Act of 1976” to terminate Cher’s rights entirely.

She later won the copyright lawsuit in May 2024, with a California judge determining that Cher was owed more than $418,000 in unpaid royalties.


And yet she's got to pay one million in court costs?  That's why people are wary of our judicial system.  .

I've always liked the Steve Miller Band.  Jacqueline Burt Cote (PARADE) reports:


What inspires a songwriter? It seems like most of the time, an emotion like love is the driving force behind a song...but in the case of one classic '70s hit, it was the desire to blow a rival rock band off the stage.

Released as the second single from Steve Miller Band's ninth studio album, Fly Like an Eagle, "Rock'n Me" peaked at #1 on the Billboard Hot 100 on Nov. 6, 1976, and went on to become a classic rock staple. But initially, Steve Miller had just one motive in mind when he sat down to pen the tune.

As Miller explained to Uncle Joe Benson on the Ultimate Classic Rock Nights radio show, it all started when he was asked to open for Pink Floyd at the 1975 Knebworth festival near London, England.
“I kept trying to turn down the gig,” Miller recalled. “I said, ‘I don’t have a band. I don’t wanna do this. This is a bad time for me. I’m in the midst of recording...' They just kept saying, ‘Well, how about some more? How about if we paid you this much? If that wouldn’t be enough would this be enough?’ Finally I decided, ‘Well, this would be enough! Yeah, I can take a little break to do this!’”

In other news, Sarah Crocker (GRUNGE) notes the five most recorded folk-rock songs (Joni Mitchell's "Both Sides Now" is at number three).  Lastly, Caitlin Huston (THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER) notes:

Ben Folds, the former artistic advisor to the National Symphony Orchestra, which was housed at the Kennedy Center, spoke out against Trump's takeover of the institution, saying that he feared political retribution for artists performing at the center. 

"With the new partisan toxic environment under the current administration, I could not trust that artists I booked at the Kennedy Center would be safe from retribution if they said or sung something that might displease the president or his political lackeys who now controlled the Center," Folds said. "I could not perform my job or the mission I was brought on to do, and for this reason, with great sadness, I had no choice but to resign."
"These days, if an artist agrees to perform at the Kennedy Center, they risk being seen as explicitly endorsing the Trump administration and all of its policies. Declining an invitation to perform at the Kennedy Center will have an equal and opposite political effect. There may be certain artists who will thrive in this environment. Comedians come to mind, but most want nothing to do with it, and will choose to create and perform their art elsewhere, and they are, and audiences are following," he continued. 

Folds appeared at a congressional forum Tuesday convened by U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and U.S. Representative Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) entitled "Monumental Waste: How Donald Trump Is Spending Millions Destroying American Landmarks," which also covered Trump's renovation of the East Wing of the White House and the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, among other projects. 

Good for Ben.  Lastly, Diana Ross remains on tour -- she and Bob Dylan are road warriors at this point.  John Katsilometes (LAS VEGAS REVIEW JOURNAL) reports:

The Motown superstar and generational icon plays Encore Theater at Wynn Las Vegas on Oct. 2, 3 and 4. The trio of dates in the “Diana in Motion” series follows Ross’s three sold-out shows over Valentine’s Day.

Tickets are on sale at 10 a.m. PT Friday at ticketmaster.com.

Stephi Wild (BROADWAY WORLD) adds:


In “Diana in Motion,” Ross will showcase decades of her chart-topping hits, including classics like “I'm Coming Out,” “Upside Down,” and “Ain't No Mountain High Enough.” Audiences can also expect the glamorous fashion, iconic stage presence, and vibrant production that define Ross' unforgettably captive live performances.

Ross' unparalleled career spans more than 50 years, encompassing extraordinary successes in music, film, television, theater, and fashion. Among her many accolades, Ms. Ross is a multi-time American Music Awards winner, a Rock & Roll Hall of Fame inductee, a Kennedy Center Honors recipient, and in 2012, received the GRAMMY Awards' highest recognition: the Lifetime Achievement Award. Her landmark solo album “diana” helped cement her Guinness World Record for the most charted hit singles in the United States and the United Kingdom. 


Closing with C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"


Wednesday, July 22, 2026.  Pete Hegseth goes begging to Congress for more money, Todd Blanche doesn't want to pay the court ordered fines, the Iran War continues with no end in sight, and much more. 


Senator Patty Murray:  143 days ago, President Trump started a war of his own choosing with Iran.  He did not consult Congress. He did not get authorization from Congress.  He did not build a coalition of allies.  He did not make a case to the American people. Nor did he ever win their support. Two-thirds of Americans oppose the war.  And the president's decision had catastrophic costs.  Seventeen American servicemembers have now died.  That includes three who tragically lost their lives over the last few days. And another is still missing.  Several hundred more have been injured -- including nearly 100 who have been hurt in just the last few weeks.  We owe all of them and their families a debt of gratitude we can never repay.  Thousands of civilians have also been killed.  The administration will not tell the public -- or Congress -- the true financial costs of the war but we know it is very well into the tens of billions of dollars.  Tax dollars we could've spent helping people afford health care-- or building new housing -- have now been lit on fire by a president who blundered us into a disastrous war.  And the costs to families' bank accounts are staggering.  Economic growth has slowed to a crawl. Inflation has shot up about 50% since this war began.  On average, gas cost just under three dollars on February 28. Today, it’s over four dollars and ticking back up with the Strait closed again. Americans have now paid more than $70 billion more on gas since the war began. That is $550 more per household.  Fertilizer costs skyrocketed in the middle of spring planting, crushing farmers operating on extremely thin margins, and costing families more on just about everything they buy at the grocery store.  The costs of this war have been astronomical. And what has it been for? What has actually been achieved?  We hear a different rationale for this war every few days. It was about preempting 'imminent threats,' which we now know did not exist. It was about regime change, then liberating the Iranian people. It was about destroying Iran's nuclear program and its navy. And at one point, it was about taking out its ballistic missiles until, that is, the president decided that actually ‘it’s a little bit unfair for them not to have some.’ Trump has even suggested the war is about taking Iran's oil to "make a fortune."  And now, the United States' primary strategic objective seems to actually just be reopening the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was fully open -- toll-free --before the war began.

 

That's Senator Patty Murray speaking at yesterday afternoon's Senate Appropriations Committee that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Gen John D. Caine, Chair of the Joint-Chiefs, testified before as they sought more money for Chump's war of choice. 

 Chump started this war with lies, told the American people about it in a early morning broadcast -- of a pre-taped speech.  From the get-go, Chump and his cronies have repeatedly lied.  Senator Kirsten Gillibrand confronted Hegseth on the administration's inability to speak honestly and truthfully.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand: Secretary Hegseth, the reason why people are so upset, the reason why they are so upset with you and this administration is because the words you have used in the past don't add up. About Iran specifically: you said that we had "obliterated," quote-unquote, Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons. The president made the same claim. Yet eight months later, in February of 2026, the president launched an active war, claiming Iran was within two weeks of having a weapon. So when you say two very different things, the American people don't know who to believe or what to believe. They just know they can't afford their healthcare, they can't afford their food, they can't afford housing, and our farmers are continuing to suffer. So, which is true? Was it obliterated, or wasn't it? What;s the status?

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth: The nuclear sites under Midnight Hammer were obliterated. But the Iranians foolishly continued to attempt to pursue nuclear capabilities, which is why we destroyed their defense industrial base and so many of their other capabilities, to ensure they can't get to a nuclear weapon. So we're staying laser-focused on the objective, and you're trying to make campaign commercials. And that's fine.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand: No we're not. So listen to this: You also say that you made the missile program, quote, "destroyed and made combat ineffective." Quote, "Iran's entire ballistic missile production capacity, every company that builds every component of those missiles, has been functionally defeated --  destroyed," and that the missile program's "existing stockpiles depleted and decimated, almost completely ineffective." So why are there missiles left to hit Jordan and result in the loss of life of our brave men and women?

Secretary Pete Hegseth: As we stated from the beginning, the Iranian defense industrial base is effectively gone. But they do have underground facilities, because they're the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism, and they've spent 47 years trying to hide their missiles under mountains, just like their nuclear capabilities, because they would like to get a nuclear weapon to wield it against us.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand: We just don't know what version of the war to believe. Because it's either over or it's not over, it's within two weeks or it's not two weeks, we have no missiles or we have missiles. And that consternation is why so many New Yorkers are perplexed, stressed out, and find this war to be incredibly unpopular. Because they don't understand the choices that the president's making, they don't agree with those choices. 


Senator Patty Murray -- who is the co-chair of the Committee -- also noted the differences between what Hegsteh and Chump claim from one moment to the next. But let's instead focus on her noting the monies.  

Co-Chair Patty Murray: Secretary Hegseth, your department received $150 billion last year in the Republicans' "Big Beautiful Bill." And it also received a record $839 billion for fiscal year 2026 --  more money than you asked for last year. Combined, that is a $1 trillion budget for the year -- and as I already mentioned, your department has yet to spend half of the reconciliation funds.  Despite that, you are here today asking for tens of billions of dollars more for things that you've already asked for in your FY27 request or that have nothing to do with Iran.  This administration has tried to sell this as an emergency request, but it may be better understood as an attempt to skirt the normal appropriations process.  Here are just a few of the things requested in this "Iran" supplemental: $800 million for the National Guard to patrol DC even longer. Over $1 billion for the Army to patrol the southern border, which is DHS's job. $900 million to support the administration's illegal boat strikes in the Caribbean. Over $18 billion for munitions, which you have already requested in your FY27 budget request. And $1.7 billion to pay for your decision to recruit more people than the services need, which was not contemplated by the FY26 funding bill Congress recently passed. Now, you have already submitted a reprogramming request on this that our subcommittee is considering now, which really underscores the point I made in my opening remarks that the problem is not a lack of money, but poor planning.  So, I'll be blunt: the truth is your request does not make a lot of sense. So, let me ask you a simple question: Why exactly are billions of dollars more for the National Guard and this administration's illegal strikes in the Caribbean urgently needed for the Iran war?

Secretary Pete Hegseth:  Well, Senator, I wouldn't -- of course -- agree with your characterization, but why this kind of spending is needed is because of the gross negligence and neglect of the Biden administration inside our department. [Biden] ran it like a bureaucracy, abandoned our strength posture around the world, so we're having to reestablish deterrence.  You mentioned the end strength numbers, and I will acknowledge that we are ahead of schedule on end strength in recruiting, 8,000 in the Navy, 6,000 in the Army, 4,000 in the Air Force. Because under President Trump, there's been record and historic over 30-year recruiting records inside our department since he won the election. Because the American people didn't want to sign up for what Joe Biden was providing our military, and they want to sign up for what President Trump is doing in his leadership, and so those are good problems to have that we need to fund, and a reflection of momentum. And this budget will allow us to continue the kind of momentum that gets us ahead.

Co-Chair Patty Murray:  My point is that a lot of this request does not feel like an emergency.  



Senator Chris Murphy found that if you repeatedly asked the same question, you would finally get an answer from Hegseth.

Senator Chris Murphy: Thank you all for being here today, Secretary Hegseth. The American people either didn't want this war or were deeply skeptical of this war because they have seen this country make the same mistake over and over again in wars in the Middle East, and that is to create either unrealistic or open-ended objectives. You said in March that the United States was "on plan to defeat, destroy, and disable all of Iran's meaningful military capabilities at a pace that the world has never seen before." Obviously, as we've discussed here today, that objective has not been achieved and is not going to be achieved. Iran is adept, more adept than even at the start of the war, at hiding their capabilities or repairing after damage we have done. There's an open report that when it comes to their missile sites along the Strait of Hormuz, 30 of 33 are still operational.

Secretary Pete Hegseth: I wouldn't believe all the open reports, Senator.

Senator Chris Murphy: But I've also heard you say in this hearing that the objectives now seem to be more limited than they were at the outset of the war. That this is about reopening the Strait and this is about dismantling nuclear capability. And the president, of course, has said himself that he thinks Iran has a right to a missile program.  So, my question is pretty simple: Is it correct that it is no longer a war objective to destroy all of their military capacities? This is what the president has said. Have our goals been simplified to reopening the Strait and to getting into a negotiation over a nuclear program. Now, I don't think you have a realistic plan to do either of those things, but I think it's important for us to know what we're funding. Are the objectives much more limited today than they were when you made that statement in March?


Secretary Pete Hegseth: So, I think the objectives have been consistent and clear from the beginning. And I would compare it to North Korea, where a conventional buildup was used to hide a nuclear capability that eventually evolved to a point where it couldn't be contested. And what Iran continued to do, even after Midnight Hammer, was try to build that conventional capability to dare anyone to stop them from pursuing nuclear weapons.  So, getting after their conventional capabilities, missile launchers, defense industrial base, their navy was all part of it. Ensuring they can't blackmail us into pursuing a nuclear capability, laser-focused on Iran will never have a nuclear capability – that's the promise the president has made, and that he will keep.

Senator Chris Murphy: Is it still a war objective, either through military action or through a diplomatic agreement to destroy and disable all of Iran's meaningful military capacities, including their missile program?

Secretary Pete Hegseth: As far as all: when we talked about that from the podium at the outset of this, we were talking about their defense industrial base. And if you look at the metrics of their ability to make more, that it's been overwhelmingly destroyed. Not everything, but overwhelmingly. Now, do they have missiles in underground bunkers because they're a terror state? Sure, they do, and we've acknowledged that from the beginning. But their capacity is less today than it's ever been…

Senator Chris Murphy: They obviously, they obviously have significant capacity to effectively disrupt the entirety of the Middle East and oil flows out of the Middle East, and that's not going to change. 


As Senator Tammy Baldwin noted to Hegseth: 

This supplemental request is another example of this Administration's backwards priorities. Instead of spending tens of billions of dollars more for the President's war in Iran, we should be meeting the needs of American families.  We could invest this money to accelerate new cures and treatments for cancer and Alzheimer's disease. Or we could use it to help more families with rising home energy costs. We could use this funding to help more families afford quality childcare. We could use this funding to help more kids get free school lunch. We could use this funding to restore healthcare for working families. We could use this funding to support our public schools and special education. This was a misguided war of choice, and every dollar spent on this war is a dollar not spent helping families afford housing, health care, childcare or groceries at home.




Hegseth sputtered and lied throughout the hearing about the war that no one ever needed.  AP notes:

The U.S. and Iran are back to bombing every day in a bid to control the Strait of Hormuz. And neither is backing down, showing the limitations of President Donald Trump’s reliance on escalating airstrikes to bend Tehran to his will. While the Trump administration says it is open to diplomacy, Iran so far has refused to loosen its grip over the crucial oil shipping corridor in the Persian Gulf. It is raising questions about the strategy for the conflict's next phase. The intensifying attacks have collapsed an interim ceasefire deal, killed more American troops and sent U.S. gasoline prices back up, posing more problems for Republicans hoping to get reelected.

Let's get something straight for Chump and for the media -- stop using "soldiers."  Chump posted "Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over."  The 18 dead include Cmdr Gabriel Edwards who was not a "soldier" but a sailor since he was in the Navy and the 18 dead include Maj John A. Klinner, Sgt Ashley B. Pruitt and Capt Ariana G. Savino who were not "soldiers"  but  airmen since they were in the Air Force. Marines are not soldiers, they are Marines.  Stop using the term "soldiers" for all members of the US military.  You can use "troops" and you can use "service members" but "soldiers" is not an all inclusive term. 



The war in Iran has entered a bleak new phase.

After weeks of fragile peace and stalled negotiations, the weekend deaths of multiple U.S. service members — coupled with new reporting showing there may be more previously undisclosed injuries — have left White House allies afraid the president is rapidly running out of ways to extricate the U.S. from an unpopular, expensive conflict ahead of the midterms.
“This is what a quagmire looks like,” said one person close to the White House, who was granted anonymity to discuss private conversations.


The Pentagon faces an urgent budget shortfall caused largely by the war in Iran, with some critical lines of funding set to run out within weeks even as President Donald Trump escalates the conflict with Tehran, according to lawmakers and current and former U.S. officials.

The funding crunch is already leading the Pentagon to limit training and maintenance that help maintain military readiness, according to four current and former officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to candidly describe the budget constraints.
And the collapsed ceasefire with Iran could further strain the military’s budget: After four U.S. service members died during more than a week of intensified fighting, officials in Washington signaled they were preparing for a wider conflict.

The White House has asked Congress for an immediate infusion of $67 billion to help cover the costs of the war, but lawmakers are gridlocked over how to proceed. The House plans to leave Washington on Thursday for a month-long recess, leaving any deal on military funding weeks away at the earliest.
[. . .]
When Hegseth testified before the House panel on defense spending in April, committee leaders urged him to provide information on the war’s costs as soon as possible. The Pentagon later missed the panel’s deadline and has since failed to share requested details for weeks, including the number of precision weapons the military has in its inventories after burning through thousands of munitions in Iran, according to lawmakers and congressional aides.

“We need to know what we’re purchasing and why we’re purchasing it,” Rep. Betty McCollum of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the panel, said in an interview.

Hegseth has at times dismissed concerns about munitions shortages, telling CBS News in an interview last month that U.S. stockpiles were “great, and they’re only getting stronger.”

In private, Pentagon officials have expressed far greater anxiety, according to current and former officials, arguing that the military desperately needs more money to restock munitions needed to deter U.S. adversaries like Russia and China.

Returning to loose lips Hegseth, Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) reports MORNING JOE's Jonathan Lemire stated on air Tuesday:

During a segment on reports that there are more military casualties in the war than have been publicly announced by the Pentagon, Lemire said all the bad news out of Iran is weighing on the president — and there is no way he will take the blame.

“Secretary Hegseth, you know, he still, I am told, is liked by the president,“ Lemire told co-host Joe Scarborough before adding, “He does not have that many fans in the administration otherwise, that's been the case from the very beginning, from even the transition when he wasn't very truthful with the vetting teams about some of the issues in his past.
“But at least, right now, Trump is still on board. But I am told that if this continues to bog down, whether it's a low-level conflict or a high-intensity resumption of war for months, Trump will eventually look for a fall guy, and it's hard to imagine it being anyone other than Pete Hegseth.”


 If that does happen, don't look for Hegseth to go on to become a leading name in the fitness industry.  Sarah Rumpf (MEDIAITE) notes:

It sounds plausible to say that America has seen Pete Hegseth in a T-shirt and shorts more than any prior Secretary of Defense, but his technique in those workout videos he loves posting would get a flunking grade, according to several military fitness experts interviewed by The Atlantic.
The Secretary of Defense has made physical fitness and appearance a core part of his focus since making the transition from a Fox & Friends Weekend host to leading the world’s powerful military. He’s scolded older officers for getting “fat,” barred troops with facial hair from events, and posted numerous videos of himself working out with members of the military.

One recent video Hegseth posted showed him and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promoting what they called “The Pete and Bobby Challenge,” which consists of trying to do at least 50 pull-ups and 100 push-ups in under ten minutes.

Video clips of Hegseth and Kennedy went viral, with many commentators mocking Kennedy’s habit of working out in jeans and dissing the whole thing as cringy and awkward.
Hegseth’s form is so bad, multiple military fitness experts said he “fails on form” the service’s tests based on his videos, according to a report by The Atlantic’s Tom Bartlett headlined “Pete Hegseth, You Call That a Pull-Up?”

Bartlett noted that Hegseth and the agency he oversees are the ones recording, editing, posting, and heavily promoting these videos (which he mockingly refers to as “Boot Camp Pete” episodes), and he’s the one who declared strict and harsh judgment was the way to go on military fitness issues.
With each one of these videos, Bartlett wrote, “critics skewer his form and mock his endurance,” dissing him as “all flex and no fundamentals.”



The publication also got feedback on the Pete & Bobby Challenge from Maureen LeBoeuf, a retired brigadier general.

The first and only woman to head the physical education department at West Point said nothing Hegseth did in the video would have counted had she been grading him.
“His pull-ups or chin-ups and the kicking that he does—you would never allow that. You’d stop somebody; you’d say, ‘OK, you’re done,’” she said. “He just keeps kicking, and it’s not a good look.”

Factoring in possible exhaustion, LeBoeuf pointed out the irony of fatigue and cutting corners from someone who is “real big on standards.”
Citing a Marine guide that calls out “poor quality work” that can lead to injury, Bartlett says “Hegseth’s work is, by Marine standards, poor.”


Juan Jairo Coronilla Durán, a 28-year-old Mexican national from San Luis de la Paz, Guanajuato, who died during an immigration enforcement operation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in St. Augustine, Florida, on July 14, 2026, had a valid tourist visa. A close associate of the family revealed that he had entered the country three weeks ago for a vacation.
The incident occurred when ICE agents encountered Coronilla Durán and three other men during an operation at a gas station near State Road 16 in St. Augustine, Florida. Durán attempted to flee on foot and tried to cross State Road 16, where he was struck by an eastbound tractor-trailer. He later died of his injuries at the scene.
Isaret Jeffers, who is part of an organization supporting Durán’s wife, said he had proper documentation to be in the U.S. Durán had allegedly entered the United States three weeks ago for vacation and had been in Florida for two days. “He was going to return this past Saturday. He had already bought a flight ticket,” Jeffers said in a conversation with the Tampa Bay Times. “Now, unfortunately, if he is returning, his return is different.”
“People are too afraid to go out and do things that used to be normal, like going to the supermarket, taking their kids to the park,” Jeffers said in a statement, referring to the increasing amount of immigrant deaths under the Trump administration. “None of that is happening anymore.”

But ICE continues to waive their guns around.  Even at teenagers.  Dina ArĂ©valo (MY SA) reports:

Days after ICE agents fatally shot two motorists in Houston and Biddeford, Maine, another encounter involving federal immigration agents has left residents in a South Texas town shaken.

On Tuesday, July 14, Samantha AlarcĂłn took to Facebook to share her experience during an ICE operation in Laguna Vista, which is about 10 miles from South Padre Island. Her post quickly gained traction, drawing more than 3,000 shares and 2,000 comments, as she described federal agents wearing face coverings apprehending a young man on a residential street. Agents later released the 18-year-old after determining he was a U.S. citizen.
AlarcĂłn said she was nearly "run off the road" as multiple unmarked vehicles pursued an SUV across narrow, curbless residential streets where the speed limit is 20 mph. AlarcĂłn was with her son when the unmarked vehicles drove past her "with no lights, no logos, and masked men inside." AlarcĂłn told MySA she was forced to veer into the grass as the vehicles sped over speed humps.

In AlarcĂłn's photos, body-worn cameras can be seen on both federal agents and local police officers.

The teen remained in the back seat after the driver and another passenger fled from a vehicle stopped in the driveway of a home. AlarcĂłn alleged in the Facebook post that federal immigration agents entered a neighbor's yard, drew their weapons and pointed a gun at the teen.

AlarcĂłn said she yelled for agents to let the teen go. She wrote in her post, "I screamed at the top of my lungs that he was just a high school kid." Ultimately, the agents did, allegedly asking AlarcĂłn to give him a ride home.
"The drive home broke my heart. This poor young man was sitting in my truck crying in pure, unadulterated fear while talking to his mom on the phone," AlarcĂłn said.



A U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer from El Paso, Texas, appeared in federal court after he was indicted and arrested for charges related to alleged false reporting of an excessive use of force.

Court documents reveal while CBP officer Jesus Espinosa, 52, was acting as a federal law enforcement officer in August 2021, he allegedly used excessive force to detain a person, including using a chokehold that led to the detainee being injured.




Democrats running for office have to face falsehoods from Republicans and from some Democrats as well.  Enter the Hogglette.  Ahmad Austin Jr. (MEDIAITE) reports on David Hogg:

Ex-DNC vice chair David Hogg torched the top campaign arm of the Democratic Party as being “evil” and picking “terrible candidates.”

Hogg reignited his feud with the Democratic establishment this past weekend at the College Democrats of America convention in Washington, D.C. During his remarks, be blasted party leadership for its choice of candidates and declared the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee was inherently “evil.”

“We’re an organization — imagine if there was a non-evil version of the [DCCC] that existed,” Hogg said. “No offense. Like, we need their funding in general elections, but man, they really know how to pick terrible candidates sometimes. But it’s fine. They usually lose.”


The Hogglette couldn't stop crying suuu-eee, suuu-eee.  If he had been able to, he might have been able to have spoken the truth and apologized.  For what?  His new group is Leaders We Deserve and they're supposed to back young progressives.  I don't know that 41 is all that young but they did back a 41 year old this year.  And it was the most infamous 'Democrat.'  It's the one that resigned in disgrace after credible reports of sexual assault, after Nazi tattoos and so very much more.  Yes, that's right, David endorsed Graham Platner. He was one of 9 people running for the state or national legislature that David endorsed. What did David say again?  Oh, that's right, he said, "As our party charts a path forward, Graham Platner represents not the entire solution, but a vital step in the right direction"  The right direction?  Hogg, Platner resigned in disgrace.  The right direction, you said.  Imainge if there was a non-evil version of David Hogg that existed.  Imagine that. 




Turning to Chump's now-dead pal Jeffrey Epstein.  For years, decades, the two were thick as thieves.  At least two meetings took place at the White House in the Situation Room that Chump wasn't present for but in which underlings like then-Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, head of the FBI Ka$h Patel and others plotted and schemed on how to handle a release of the Epstein files in a manner that would cause the least harm to Donald Chump.  That's a conspiracy and everyone in that room should be made to answer for why they were present and how they reconcile their actions in those two meetings with their oaths to the Constitution.  


Emails from Jeffrey Epstein to world leaders indicate he should have registered as a foreign agent, House Judiciary Democrats argue, including messages showing he sought to capitalize on his relationship to President Trump.

In a letter to top Trump administration officials, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said the communications from the deceased sex offender that have been publicly released show significant conversations that raise “serious questions about the extent to which he wielded his ties to President Trump in dealings with foreign governments.”
Epstein has long come under fire for his significant foreign ties and has been trailed by conspiracy theories he was a spy, accusations Vice President Vance referenced last week in telling podcaster Joe Rogan that the financier surely must have had connections to American and Israeli intelligence at the highest levels. 
The letter from Raskin makes no such claim but argues that even if unpaid, the work performed by Epstein would have required registration under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), as required of all who lobby on behalf of foreign governments.
“We find substantial evidence that Mr. Epstein acted to advance the interests of the governments of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait; advised the government of Russia on how to shape its dealings with President Trump; worked as an ongoing consultant for Ehud Barak, the former Prime Minister of the government of Israel; and repeatedly capitalized on his long-term friendship with President Donald Trump to sign up business from these and other foreign governments and actors in the aftermath of President Trump’s first election, without ever registering as a foreign agent,” Raskin wrote.



In other Epstein news, Lauren Peller and Peter Charalambous (ABC NEWS) report that Alan Dershowitz bailed on the House Oversight Committee Monday, "House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., called it 'unacceptable' Tuesday that attorney Alan Dershowitz failed to appear Monday for a scheduled transcribed interview as part of the committee's probe into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."  Josh Christenson (NEW YORK POST) adds:

Oversight Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) seethed in a Tuesday letter to Dershowitz that he was attempting to “hide from this Committee’s investigation” into the powerful late pedophile, including of his potential government connections — despite having said he had “nothing to hide” and that he could share relevant details at the scheduled July 20 sit-down.

“The Committee will not tolerate any further delay,” Comer fumed. “Accordingly, we reiterate our request that you testify at an in-person, videotaped transcribed interview on September 2, 2026.
“If you fail to adhere to this request, the Committee will explore all available tools at its disposal, including the use of the compulsory process,” the GOP chairman added.


In other news, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche did not release all of The Epstein Files.  Journalist Katie Phang brought a suit against him over this.  The court sided with Katie but Blanche is refusing to do as instructed.  MORNING HONEY explains:

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche asked a federal judge on Monday to avoid a $1,000-a-day fine, describing a contempt action against him as "absurd."
Blanche is the defendant in a lawsuit brought by independent journalist Katie Phang. 

She claims he violated the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires the Justice Department to release files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan supported Phang in June. He found that Blanche never challenged her main claims in court: that he missed the law’s deadline, made improper redactions, and withheld documents he was required to provide.

Sullivan ordered Blanche to produce handwritten FBI notes from agents who interviewed a woman accusing President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her as a minor. 

He also ordered emails to Epstein without redacted sender names and documents naming potential co-conspirators. Phang asked the judge to impose a $1,000-a-day fine until Blanche complied.

In his reply brief on Monday, Blanche called Phang's filings filled with "hyperbolic rhetoric seeking to impose punitive sanctions" and "outlandish claims." 

He referred to her contempt argument as "absurd" and her factual claims as "sensational and unsubstantiated." 


Phang’s ongoing lawsuit is yet another headache for Blanche, whose scheme to secure a permanent promotion to attorney general has not exactly been smooth sailing. After days of tense confirmation hearings in the Senate, an uncomfortable meeting with Epstein survivors, and hundreds of Blanche’s former colleagues opposing his nomination, $1,000 a day just might drive him over the edge.

Katie Phang responds in the video below.


Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Jim Banks (R-Ind.), along with Representatives Becca Balint (D-Vt.) and Ben Cline (R-Va.), filed a bipartisan, bicameral resolution directing the FTC to investigate serial acquisitions of firetruck manufacturers. 

Following two decades of consolidation by private equity firms and larger manufacturers, a vast majority of the fire truck manufacturing industry is now controlled by just three companies. Since then:

  • Prices have skyrocketed. Fire truck prices have doubled over the last decade, far outpacing inflation for heavy-duty truck manufacturing over that time period. Manufacturers have also exploited their market power to implement “floating” prices, increasing the final price of a fire truck after it goes into production.
  • Manufacturing plants have shuttered. Dominant fire truck manufacturers have restricted supply by closing their own manufacturing facilities, even though demand for fire trucks has increased in recent years.
  • Delivery backlogs are growing. Since 2019, the lead times for fire truck delivery have nearly tripled, and fire departments are now facing delivery delays of up to five years.
  • Working conditions are unsafe. Higher prices and longer delivery times for fire trucks have prevented fire departments from replacing aging trucks, depriving fire fighters of the essential equipment required to work safely and effectively.

Rampant consolidation in the fire truck manufacturing industry is undermining public safety, squeezing fire departments’ budgets, and forcing taxpayers to bear the consequences.

The Federal Trade Commission Act authorizes Congress, through a joint resolution passed by the Senate and House of Representatives, to direct the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate and report the facts relating to any alleged violations of antitrust law. However, Congress has not used this authority to order an FTC investigation since the Great Depression era.

This bipartisan joint resolution would revive that authority and direct the FTC to report to Congress within one year on:

  • The extent of anticompetitive practices and violations of antitrust law in the fire truck manufacturing industry, including price fixing, price gouging, serial acquisitions, and monopolization;
  • The monetary and other harms of anticompetitive practices and violations of antitrust law in the fire truck manufacturing industry on fire fighters, fire departments, states, municipalities, and small businesses; and
  • Recommendations for legislation or other remedial actions.

“When giant corporations and Wall Street investors buy up all the fire truck manufacturers, it’s a threat to public safety,” said Senator Warren. “There’s a growing, bipartisan consensus that Congress must stop a handful of corporations from dominating fire truck manufacturing and making it harder and tremendously more expensive to get fire trucks.”

“Anticompetitive practices are strong-arming our cities, wasting taxpayer dollars, and leaving firefighters without life-saving equipment. I’m proud to join this bipartisan investigation as we fight to put hardworking Indiana taxpayers first,” said Senator Banks.

“Too often, growing delivery backlogs in the fire truck manufacturing industry are leaving fire departments across the Commonwealth and our Nation without the necessary equipment first responders need to do their jobs safely and effectively. This bipartisan resolution takes an important first step to restore competition, strengthen domestic manufacturing, and ensure taxpayers and local fire departments receive fair value,” said Representative Cline.

“Every community deserves to have the fire trucks it needs to keep people safe. But corporate consolidation has driven up prices considerably and left communities waiting years for this essential, lifesaving equipment,” said Representative Balint. “This is yet another example of why we need strong antitrust enforcement: a handful of powerful companies shouldn’t be able to use their power to get richer by making it harder for communities to protect themselves.”

This follows a bipartisan investigation led by Senators Warren and Banks into the harms of private equity roll-ups of fire truck manufacturers that they launched in April 2025.

Senator Warren also sounded the alarm on private equity’s consolidation of the fire truck manufacturing industry at a September 2025 hearing of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Disaster Management, District of Columbia, and Census.

The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) and the American Economic Liberties Project (AELP) have endorsed the resolution.

###