If I say "Don't Stop
Believing"? You say: Journey! Journey was a major bad in the 80s.
These days? It's on a farewell tour and suffering from one liar. Devon Ivie (VULTURE) reports:
For
a band that once advised its listeners to love, touch, and squeeze each
other, Journey has endured some ridiculous drama over the past few
years, insofar that two of its founding members, Neal Schon and Jonathan
Cain, are sharing the stage every night on the band’s current farewell
tour despite having active lawsuits filed against each other.
Septuagenarian fights about management and overspending aren’t new to
the rock industry, but if sullying the name of Steve Perry comes into
play, we’ll need to defend our man posthaste. In a new Rolling Stone
article, Cain admitted that he purposely lied about Perry’s interest in
reuniting with Journey for the band’s tour, which he set into motion
with a February interview with Ultimate Classic Rock.
“I just kind of planted a little seed out,” Cain now told Rolling
Stone. “I was trying to fish a little bit, and say, ‘Well, he’s thinking
about it.’ He came immediately out and said, ‘No, I’m not.’ I kind of
did that on purpose, because there’s just so much fake AI stuff going
on. You just look at it and go, ‘Wait a minute, no, that’s not true.
None of this is true.’” Cain — who identifies as MAGA — got his wish for
a 24-hour news cycle to rile up fans, as Perry had to refute the rumors
and “gently put them to rest.” Seems like a great use of everyone’s
time.
Journey
keyboardist Jonathan Cain is defending his outspoken Christian faith
and conservative values amid ongoing tensions within the Bay Area rock
group, which recently set out on its Final Frontier farewell tour.
Cain
and his bandmates each spoke separately with Rolling Stone ahead of
opening night of their tour at the Giant Center in Hershey, Pa. While
the band's conversations bounced from Journey's decades-long legal
drama, including with former frontman Steve Perry, and hesitation to
return to the road, Cain's portion of the interview also touched on his
religious beliefs and support of President Donald Trump.
[. . .]
The
comments come after a period of internal friction among the six-member
group, with Journey co-founder and lead guitarist Neal Schon blaming
Cain for the chasms that have formed in recent years between its current
lineup. He claims that Cain's advocacy of Trump's MAGA agenda and
right-wing, evangelical causes has compromised the group's apolitical
origins.
"We were never going to affiliate
politics with our music, and we're never going to affiliate any one
religion … Why attach yourself into one portion of something," Schon
said. "You're going to lose half your fans when you do that. It's
everybody's music. I just don't agree with it. I still don't. And it's
probably one of the reasons that things are still a bit shaky."
Jonathan
Cain apparently wants to be the new Pat Boone. That's what he is and
that's as cultured as he isn't. Go away, Cain, go away.
Chrissie
Hynde arrived in London in May 1973, aged 21, knowing almost no-one in
the English capital. Within a year, she had a freelance gig writing for
Britain's best-known music magazine, the New Musical Express, and a side
hustle working at SEX, the Kings Road boutique run by designer Vivienne
Westwood and her then-partner (and future Sex Pistols manager) Malcolm
McLaren. Both gigs gave her a front row seat for the birth of punk rock
in England, but Hynde was never going to be satisfied with being merely
an observer or bit-part player in this new movement. And she credits
Lemmy from Motorhead for his piviotal role in her move to centre stage
with her own band, The Pretenders.
"Without him, the Pretenders wouldn't have happened," she stated plainly to podcaster Marc Maron in 2014.
"The
first time I clapped eyes on him was in a shop on the King’s Road,"
Hynde wrote in her 2015 memoir Reckless: My Life as a Pretender . "We
exchanged no words at all. He eyed me up and down, moved in close,
dipped the silver tube he wore on a chain around his neck into a plastic
bag of white powder, shoved it up my snout, then turned around and
walked out. I was up for three days."
Carly Simon is in the news as well. CRACKED does a photo essay on her.
At least two shots are dated from the 1970s when they are from the 80s
-- one is when she's singing on Martha's Vineyard -- her HBO concert to
promote her album COMING AROUND AGAIN. If you have CARLY SIMON COMPLETE
(a book of sheet music covering the songs she wrote for her five
albums), then you have a lot of the photos in the essay.
Rock
icon Bruce Springsteen delivered a blunt message to President Donald
Trump and his administration on Tuesday night during a politically
charged tour opener in Minneapolis.
“The
America that I love, the America that I’ve written about for 50 years,
that’s been a beacon of hope and liberty around the world, is currently
in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent, racist, reckless and treasonous
administration,” Springsteen said at the start of the show to cheers
from the audience.
The
76-year-old took to the stage at Minneapolis' Target Center on Tuesday,
March 31, directing his criticism at the president, Pam Bondi and the
"richest men in America." Springsteen began the evening by delivering a
pointed message to Trump, opening with Edwin Starr's classic War before
launching into Born in the U.S.A.
However,
it was midway through Springsteen's performance that he unleashed his
most forceful critique of the 79-year-old Trump. "We are living through
some very dark times. Our American values that have sustained us for 250
years are being challenged as never before," Springsteen declared as he
began his address. He had also recently condemned the president during
his appearance at the No Kings protest in Minnesota.
During
his on-stage remarks, the Thunder Road singer took aim at the current
conflict in Iran. "We've got our young men and women's lives at risk In
an unconstitutional and illegal war. This is happening now," he stated.
Turning
his attention to Trump's immigration agenda, Springsteen declared,
"There are immigrants being held in detention centers around the country
and being deported without due process of law to alien countries and
foreign gulags. This is happening now."
Wednesday, April 1, 2026. Chump due to address the nation tonight
regarding his Iran War, federal judge rules against him in his attack on
NPR and PBS, Kristi Noem gets some attention, Secretary of Education
Linda McMahon deserves some attention for being named in a pedo lawsuit,
and much more.
As former secretaries of defense, we
understand the profound responsibility of deploying our men and women in
uniform into harm’s way. It is critical that there be a clear
objective, a strategy to achieve the objective and an endgame to bring
our forces back home. The president, Congress and the American people
should be unified when a country goes to war.
There are now over 50,000 troops stationed in the Middle East, with President Trump reportedly considering sending forces on missions to extract Iran’s uranium or to occupy Kharg Island. Both operations are very risky and could result in heavy casualties and prolong the war.
Because
their lives are on the line, we owe it to these committed American
service members and their families to be truthful about the risks
involved and why we are at war. There was a case to be made that Iran
had a history of threatening the stability of the United States, Israel
and other nations in the Middle East. Its leaders’ support for
terrorism, arming dangerous proxy forces, developing large numbers of
missiles that could strike regional targets and efforts to develop
nuclear capability represented a genuine threat to peace and stability
in the region.
But it is also true
that the 12-day war waged by Israel and the United States against Iran
in June weakened Tehran and its proxies, damaged missile and airstrike
capabilities and set back the project to develop a nuclear bomb. By
July, Iran was no longer an imminent threat — a conclusion supported by
our intelligence agencies.
President Trump is set to address the nation on the Iran war at 9
p.m. Eastern time on Wednesday night, with White House press secretary
Karoline Leavitt saying he would be providing "an important update,"
without providing further details.
On Tuesday, Trump said he
expected the conflict to be over in two to three weeks, adding, "we'll
be leaving very soon," and promising gas prices would then "come
tumbling down."
Trump shrugged off what would happen to the
blockaded Strait of Hormuz – which has cut off one fifth of the world's
oil supply – saying, "we're not going to have anything to do with it."
He said that it wouldn't affect the U.S. and would be something for
other countries to deal with.
"They'll be able to fend for themselves," he said, having previously
told European allies who have refused to enter the war to "go get your
own oil!"
The assertion to wrap up the war quickly comes just
days after Trump threatened to up the ante if there was no deal and
Tehran didn't reopen the strait. He said he could seize Iran's oil and
blow up all of their Electric Generating Plants and desalinization
plants. He also said he was considering an invasion of Iran's key oil
export terminal, Kharg Island.
So will Chump
announce that tonight? If so, will he stick to it or will it just be
more disposable words about this war of choice? Will it happen or will
he TACO again? At least 13 American service members have died in
Chump's war of choice, over 3000 more have been left injured, between
1,500 and 3,4000 Iranians are estimated to have been killed.
And after four weeks, Chump's finally going to address the nation about this war of choice he started.
The
Department of Homeland Security permitted a Mexican woman to return
Monday to the United States after a judge found her deportation was
unlawful, a rare reprieve at a time when growing numbers of immigrants
who arrived as children are being targeted for removal.
A
federal judge had ordered DHS to facilitate Maria de Jesus Estrada
Juarez’s return to the United States, after immigration officers
deported her to Mexico even though she is actively enrolled in an Obama
administration program that prohibits her removal because she arrived in
the U.S. as a child.
Stacy Tolchin, her immigration attorney, and Ivonne Rodriguez, an advocate, confirmed Estrada had returned to California.
“This
has been one of the most painful experiences of my life,” Estrada said
after arriving in California. “I followed the rules. I trusted the
system. And for that, I was ripped away from my daughter, Damaris,
without warning. I’m home now — but what happened to me is wrong, and it
should never happen to anyone.”
Estrada, 42,
is one of dozens, if not hundreds, of immigrants enrolled in the
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program who have been
arrested and, in some cases, deported, since President Donald Trump
started his second term. Former DHS secretary Kristi L. Noem, who was
ousted this month, alleged that most had criminal histories and were
therefore eligible for removal. But congressional Democrats say Trump is
targeting a group that had cleared background checks and been promised
to be shielded from deportation.
Maria
is just one of the many harmed by Kristi Noem. The freak. Some of her
victims are dead. Some are being tortured in other countries. She has
a lot of blood on her hands. And she has a lot of nerve asking for
privacy. Yes, there's her alleged years long affair with Corey
Lewandowski who is married. And Kristi's married. But that's not what
she's asking for privacy over Do we go there? Let's. Ahmad Austin Jr. (MEDIAITE) covers it:
Former
Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem was reportedly “devastated” by
the bombshell allegations of her husband’s double life involving
crossdressing.
On Tuesday morning, Daily Mail published
a explosive report alleging that Noem’s husband, Bryon Noem, liked to
cross-dress and regularly contacted fetish models. Included in the
report were numerous photos of Bryon dressed in women’s clothing, with
what appeared to be two balloons under the shirts to imitate breasts.
Daily Mail also claimed that Bryon “lavished praise on their
surgically-enhanced bodies” and “confessed his lust for ‘huge, huge
ridiculous boobs.'”
THE DAILY MAIL published photos and texts. TMZ adds:
The
statement reads, "Ms. Noem is devastated. The family was blindsided by
this, and they ask for privacy and prayers at the time."
According
to The Daily Mail, Bryon snapped photos of himself wearing oversized
fake breasts and chatted with adult performers from the "bimbofication"
fetish scene about their massively augmented boobs.
Kristi Noem has made a career out of policing identity. She has pushed laws targeting transgender
people, restricted access to care, and framed those decisions as moral
clarity about who people are allowed to be. What began as political noise quickly became policy, enforced by the state, often against children. So when a scandal breaks inside her own family, and her response is to ask for privacy, the contradiction is not subtle. It is the system working exactly as designed.
Privacy has never been extended to the people her politics target. Transgender people, and the broader LGBTQ+
community, live under a level of scrutiny that most Americans will
never experience. Our identities are debated in legislatures, dissected
on television, and reduced to talking points in political campaigns.
Transgender
people’s bodies, their health care, their families, and their very
existence are treated as public questions to be answered repeatedly,
often by people with no stake in the outcome. There is no off switch. No
private lane. Just a constant demand to explain, justify, and defend
the simple act of being alive.
This would be easier to
dismiss as a personal scandal if it were not happening in the middle of
a coordinated political project. In 2026 alone, hundreds of anti-LGBTQ
bills have already been introduced across the country, with hundreds
more specifically targeting transgender people, restricting health care,
policing schools, and inserting the state into the most private parts
of people’s lives. The same politicians driving that effort are the ones
now asking for privacy when the scrutiny turns toward them.
So
maybe this is a moment to reconsider the rules. If privacy matters, it
should matter for everyone. If identity is complex, it should be treated
that way in law. And if living honestly is something worth protecting,
there are already people doing that work every day, often in the face of
the very policies Kristi Noem has championed.
Another
ally of former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
has found herself in legal jeopardy over delays in responding to a
natural disaster, according to a new report.
Bloomberg reported on Monday that Kara Voorhies, who was installed at the Federal Emergency Management Agency by Noem's top advisor, Corey Lewandowski,
is facing a DHS Inspector General probe into her role in responding to
the deadly floods in Texas last year. Voorhies retained outsized
influence on agency contracting and spending decisions while she worked
at DHS, according to the report.
Davis
notes that this ally of Kristi's is "the second Noem ally to come under
legal scrutiny" and that "Tricia McLaughlin, a former DHS spokesperson,
and her husband have also faced allegations of benefitting from a
massive $220 million advertising contract from DHS, according to
reports." Actually Voorhies is the third. It would go Tricia, Corey
and now Kara. That's three, not two. And there will no doubt be many
more. (And I may have forgotten one that's already known.)
Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth’s personal broker allegedly approached a major
asset manager about making a multimillion dollar investment in defense
companies in the weeks leading up to the airstrikes on Iran, according
to a report.
The Financial Times, citing three
people familiar with the matter, has alleged that Hegseth’s broker at
Morgan Stanley reached out to BlackRock in February to inquire about
making a significant investment in its Defense Industrials Active ETF.
The
inquiry from such a high-profile client was flagged internally at the
asset manager, the FT writes, and the investment was ultimately never
made as the $3.2 billion equity fund in question was not at that time
available for Morgan Stanley clients to buy.
Catherine Bouris (DAILY BEAST) adds, "The
Financial Times notes that it is unclear whether the broker
representing Hegseth found an alternative defense-focused fund to invest
in."
MAGA
Rep. James Comer has admitted that President Donald Trump’s Justice
Department has “botched” the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files.
The
Kentucky Republican was asked on CNN’s The Lead with Jake Tapper on
Monday if he had “confidence” in the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein case,
with Tapper noting that Attorney General Pam Bondi’s department has not
been in compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
The DOJ identified 6 million Epstein files for potential release, but has only disclosed about 3.5 million.
“Well,
I think the Justice Department has botched this,” said Comer, who once
described himself as a “Trump man” shortly after the Jan 6. Capitol
attack.
[. . .]
He
said Bondi blamed the slow release on ongoing class-action lawsuits
involving victims, which he said make it difficult for the DOJ to turn
over some documents.
It’s
unclear what lawsuits Comer or Bondi are referring to. A group of
Epstein survivors filed a class-action lawsuit against the DOJ last week
over its failure to redact victims’ personal information in the
documents, but it’s unclear how that would affect the millions of files
still to be released.
Richard
Kahn was deposed by the House Oversight Committee last month. After
stating that Jane Doe number four received a payout from an Epstein fund
for victims, he then disowned his testimony. Jane Doe number four is
the woman who accused Epstein and Chump of assault. María Teresita Armstrong-Matta (RAW STORY) reports US House Rep Ro Khanna appeared on Jen Psaki's MS NOW program on Sunday and they discussed this issue:
During an appearance on MS NOW, Khanna told Jen Psaki that the FBI interviewed Jane Doe 4 four times, suggesting credibility.
Khanna
proposed that Kahn retracted his statement due to fear of Trump
directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute him or take
retaliatory action. Khanna questioned why Kahn's representatives claimed
they could "neither confirm nor deny" payment of a settlement, stating
they would definitively know whether funds were disbursed.
Today,
the US Supreme Court hears arguments in Chump's efforts to overturn the
Constitution and strip people of birth right citizenship. Chump is
said to be planning to attend the hearing. If so, expect plenty of
photos of him sleeping through the arguments.
A
disgraced attorney who tried to help President Donald Trump overturn
the 2020 election has been revealed as the secret driving force behind
the administration’s effort to end birthright citizenship.
John
Eastman has been working for decades to convince the Supreme Court to
take up his fringe legal theory that the Constitution doesn’t
automatically confer citizenship on virtually all people born in the
U.S., despite the 14th Amendment’s explicit guarantees.
The
justices will hear oral arguments on the subject Wednesday in a case
challenging a Trump executive order that seeks to end birthright
citizenship.
But
the administration has apparently sought to obscure Eastman’s influence
on the topic, even as it has embraced his legal theories, according to Politico.
Trump
did not mention Eastman—who has been barred from practicing law over
his effort to subvert Joe Biden’s election victory—when he signed his
executive order, even though Eastman had been pushing Trump to try to
end birthright citizenship since the president’s first term in office.
The
Justice Department’s briefs also don’t cite any of Eastman’s 100-plus
op-eds, interviews, law review articles, debates, speeches, or
legislative hearings, despite adhering closely to Eastman’s legal
arguments, Politico noted.
The
Trump administration was hit Thursday with a new lawsuit from survivors
of Jeffrey Epstein over what they say was a “deliberate” oversight from
the Justice Department (DOJ).
“The
United States, acting through the DOJ, made a deliberate policy choice
to prioritize rapid, large-volume disclosure over protection of Epstein
survivors’ privacy,” the plaintiffs in the lawsuit said, according to a report from NBC Los Angeles.
“[The DOJ] outed approximately 100 survivors of the convicted sexual
predator, publishing their private information and identifying them to
the world. Survivors now face renewed trauma. Strangers call them, email
them, threaten their physical safety, and accuse them of conspiring
with Epstein when they are, in reality, Epstein’s victims.”
She's
just a con artist and she knows nothing about education. (She served
less than a year on that board.) She also has an Epstein like
connection with the other creeps in Chump's administration per Wikipedia:
In October 2024, McMahon was named as a defendant in a lawsuit
accusing her, her husband, and the WWE of negligence regarding the ring boy scandal, in which multiple WWE personnel, including ring announcer Mel Phillips and executives Pat Patterson and Terry Garvin, either resigned or were dismissed in 1992 after being accused of sexually assaulting young boys.[80][81] The lawsuit alleged that the McMahons fostered a culture of sexual abuse within the WWE.[82]
The lawsuit was paused by a federal judge in December 2024, pending the
outcome of a legal challenge to a state law that could impact the case.[83]
The lawsuit was allowed to proceed in February 2025; in April 2025,
McMahon filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. She has denied the claims
in the lawsuit.[84][85]
Didn't
know that until today. She's accused of being part of a pedophile
ring. I don't think she should be allowed to serve in our government
while she's accused of that. It doesn't look right.
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump’s executive
order barring the federal funding of NPR and PBS violated the First
Amendment.
Randolph Moss, a judge in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia, said in his ruling that Mr.
Trump’s order, signed last May, was unlawful because it instructed
federal agencies to refrain from funding NPR and PBS because the
president believed their news coverage had a liberal viewpoint.
“The
message is clear: NPR and PBS need not apply for any federal benefit
because the president disapproves of their ‘left-wing’ coverage of the
news,” Judge Moss wrote. But the First Amendment, he said, “does not
tolerate viewpoint discrimination and retaliation of this type.”
The
ruling will likely have minimal effect on the federal funding of public
media. Two months after the executive order, Congress voted to claw
back roughly $500 million in annual funding for the Corporation for
Public Broadcasting, the organization that distributes federal money to
NPR and PBS. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting has since shut
down, and public radio and TV stations across the country have sought
alternate forms of revenue.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
ICYMI: Murray, Booker, Lieu Reintroduce Legislation to Ban Conversion Therapy
ICYMI: Murray, Congressional Democrats File Amicus Brief Urging Supreme Court to Support Conversion Therapy Bans
Seattle, WA – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray
(D-WA), a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Health,
Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, released the following
statement in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.
The decision rejected a Colorado law that protects children from the
harmful practice of conversion therapy, putting at risk the safety and
wellbeing of children in Colorado and 23 states around the country—including Washington state—with similar restrictions.
“Conversion therapy is a dangerous practice based on the
hateful idea that being part of the LGBTQ+ community is an illness that
requires treatment—it’s child abuse. Conversion therapy should be banned
nationwide, and I have a bill to do just that because there is no real
debate in the medical community—the overwhelming majority of mental
health care providers know how harmful this practice is. I’m not going
to stop fighting for a world where every person, no matter their gender
or sexual orientation, can live with dignity and without fear.”
Senator Murray has consistently fought to ban conversion therapy and
ensure that LGBTQ+ people have access to high-quality health care. Last
year, Senator Murray, joined by Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Congressman Ted
W. Lieu (D-CA-36), reintroduced her Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act
legislation that would ban conversion therapy—a practice that has been
recognized by the national community of professionals in health,
education, social work, and counseling as being both dangerous and
useless. Senator Murray first introduced the legislation in the 114th Congress and has pushed to pass it every Congress since.
In addition to Senators Murray and Booker, the Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act was
cosponsored by Senators Baldwin, Bennet, Blumenthal, Cantwell, Coons,
Cortez-Masto, Duckworth, Durbin, Fetterman, Gillibrand, Hassan,
Heinrich, Hickenlooper, Hirono, Kaine, Kelly, Kim, King, Klobuchar,
Luján, Markey, Merkley, Murphy, Padilla, Reed, Rosen, Sanders, Schiff,
Shaheen, Slotkin, Smith, Van Hollen, Warren, Welch, Whitehouse, and
Wyden.
The legislation was introduced in the House with 70 original cosponsors. The Therapeutic Fraud Prevention Act is
endorsed by the Congressional Equality Caucus, Human Rights Campaign,
PFLAG, American Academy of Pediatrics, Equality California, National
Association of School Psychologists, Christopher Street Project, and
Advocates for Trans Equality.
Also last year, Senator Murray joined Democratic colleagues in the House and Senate in filing an amicus brief
urging the United States Supreme Court to uphold the constitutionality
of Colorado’s ban on mental health professionals engaging in conversion
therapy for minors in this case, Chiles v. Salazar.
Aretha's
first studio album, Aretha: With The Ray Bryant Combo, released in
1961, wasn't a huge financial - or critical - success. Nevertheless,
record producer and music historian Frank Driggs had this to say after
listening to it: "The word is out. A magnetic new artist, Aretha
Franklin, only a short while away from her father's gospel church in
Detroit, has been breaking up audience in theatres and nightclubs
throughout the country and on Columbia single records. Combining a
completely natural and uninhibited vocal style with an irresistible
rhythmic sense, Aretha Franklin has established herself as one of the
hottest new performers in show business and one likely to set new
standards in the entertainment industry. She doesn't just open the door -
she breaks it down."
John
Landis' 1980 musical comedy "The Blues Brothers," which made one of my
/Film colleagues a lifelong fan of the action genre, is based on
characters created for "Saturday Night Live" and is a miniature blues
hall of fame unto itself. There are cameos from musical legends like
James Brown, Ray Charles, Cab Calloway, John Lee Hooker, and, of course,
the inimitable Aretha Franklin. The makers of "The Blues Brothers" came
up with the flimsiest possible excuses to get these musicians to
perform, and the audience doesn't mind the contrivance. Any excuse will
do if it gets Aretha Franklin to sing "Think."
In
the context of the movie, Franklin plays Mrs. Murphy, the co-owner of a
soul food diner and wife of Matt "Guitar" Murphy (himself), the
ex-guitarist for the Blues Brothers' band. The Blues Brothers (Dan
Aykroyd and John Belushi) have arrived at the Murphys' diner to recruit
Matt for their band in the hopes of playing a reunion show and earning
enough money to save the orphanage where they were raised. Mrs. Murphy
implores that Matt not rejoin the band, and she sings "Think," asking
him to, well, think about it. It's a standout musical sequence in a film
full of standout musical sequences.
Franklin
loved making the movie. She was no stranger to cameras, having first
performed on "The Tonight Show Starring Jack Parr" all the way back in
1962.
Tom Petty almost gave away one of his biggest hits.
For
years, “Don’t Do Me Like That” sat forgotten in his catalog, a song he
considered too simple to bother with. By the time he began recording
Damn the Torpedoes with producer Jimmy Iovine in 1978, the track was
already five years old, and Petty was ready to hand it off to another
band entirely.
It took a persistent producer and a blunt comment from a studio assistant to convince him otherwise.
As Petty later explained, the song’s origins were surprisingly humble.
“It’s based on something my dad used to say,” he said.
His
father’s expression was a simple plea for respect. In Petty’s hands,
though, it became something darker. In the song’s story, a jilted friend
warns the narrator that the same fate could happen to him, planting a
seed of suspicion about his girlfriend.
It made for a
compelling narrative hook. Combined with the song’s straightforward
chord structure and driving beat, “Don’t Do Me Like That” was clearly a
strong tune for Mudcrutch, the band he and guitarist Mike Campbell
performed with prior to the formation of Tom Petty and the
Heartbreakers.
[. . .]
Released
on November 5, 1979 as the lead single from Damn the Torpedos, “Don’t
Do Me Like That” went to number 10 on the Billboard Hot 100. It’s the
group’s only song to reach the top 10 of that chart, and became even
more popular in Canada, where it peaked at number three.
Even
some of the greatest songs are met with a bit of drama, and that's
exactly what happened to a hit track by American girl group The
Chiffons. In 1963, their debut song, written by Ronnie Mack, hit No.1 on
the charts 63 years ago and entered a legal battle with a Beatles
member.
Out of the Bronx, New
York, in 1960, The Chiffons made a name for themselves during the era.
The group was originally made up of a trio of schoolmates consisting of
lead singer Judy Craig, backed by Patricia Bennett and Barbara Lee. They
were discovered by Mack after hearing them harmonise in their school
lunch room, and the rest was history.
They
released their debut track, "He's So Fine," in January 1963 with the
doo-wop band and production company group the Tokens as their backing
instrumentals. After the song was recorded, Capitol Records, where the
Tokens were house producers, didn't like the track and claimed it was
too simple. The Tokens instead decided to shop around the track to
different labels before landing on Laurie Records, which immediately
jumped on the opportunity.
And,
of course, it was later used by George Harrison with his "My Sweet
Lord." That was a solo hit for Harrison, not one of the hits he wrote
for the Beatles. Nancy Wilson notes the Beatles in a recent
interview. Deborah Cruz (PARADE) reports:
Nancy
Wilson knows exactly who to thank for her legendary rock career. The
Heart guitarist recently revealed that The Beatles sparked the musical
fire that led her and sister Ann Wilson to become rock icons.
According
to Music News, the 71-year-old rocker opened up about her inspiration
during an interview with WJFF Radio Catskill, explaining that she and
her sister never set out to be trailblazers in the male-dominated rock
world. "The Beatles came out when we were little kids, and The Beatles
just drove us to our calling," Wilson shared. "It was just like we were
aimed like a pistol from the minute."
Growing
up in a musical military family with singing, piano playing and harmony
sessions with aunts, uncles and grandparents, the Wilson sisters had the
perfect foundation. When The Beatles burst onto the scene, everything
clicked into place.
Wilson explained that being women
in rock never felt like an obstacle at first. "We had no sexual identity
to conform to at the beginning. So we just went ahead, like the
military brats that we are — we just joined forces and took no
prisoners," she said with a laugh.
According
to Britannica, Heart officially formed in 1973 and released their debut
album "Dreamboat Annie" in 1975. The album featured instant classics
like "Magic Man" and "Crazy on You," launching the sisters into rock
stardom. Their powerful blend of hard rock, folk influences and Ann's
soaring vocals set them apart.
Picking
the best songs ever made is a nearly impossible task. However, there
are some tracks that have persevered as undeniable hits.
In
2024, Rolling Stone ranked the 500 best songs of all time, compiling a
list of the greatest tracks in history. Ranked among classic hits like
Bruce Springsteen's 1975 song "Born to Run" at No. 27 and David Bowie's
1977 song "Heroes" at No. 23, Joni Mitchell's 1971 breakup anthem, "A
Case of You," took the No. 26 spot.
Released on her
landmark fourth studio album, Blue, "A Case of You" garnered immense
critical acclaim. Upon its release, the track was widely recognized by
artists for its brilliance and emotional depth. Although the song did
not chart alongside the album's other hits, "California" and "Carey," it
is regarded as one of the album's most enduring tracks. Today, it has
become one of the most covered love songs in history with over 300
recorded renditions, including notable versions by Prince and Diana
Krall.
Written by Mitchell, "A Case
of You" is a deeply personal account of her relationships with those
many believe to be Leonard Cohen and Graham Nash. The track highlights
themes of profound loss and identity struggles, amplifying the emotional
heartache that comes with a breakup. Mitchell uses imagery comparing
her lover to "holy wine" as a metaphor for her partner's intoxicating
nature.
When
Trump arrived at his West Palm Beach golf course on Saturday morning,
it marked his 56th visit there since his 2025 inauguration. It was his
110th day on a golf course that he owns — meaning he has played golf on
more than one-quarter of his days since returning to the presidency. Per our analysis, Trump is now on track to spend $300 million on his golf habit by the end of his term.
President
Trump zigzagged from claims of diplomatic progress to renewed threats
of destruction on Monday, sending new shocks through oil markets as he
sought to pressure Iran to make a deal to end the monthlong war.
Mr.
Trump said in a Truth Social post that there had been “great progress”
in talks with Tehran but warned that if they failed to produce an
agreement, he would order the bombardment of Iranian power plants, oil
infrastructure and potentially desalination plants. The president has
repeatedly threatened such attacks in recent weeks, only to back down,
as the global economy reels from the risk to energy supplies.
Despite
Mr. Trump’s claim that the United States is in talks with “a new, and
more reasonable, regime” in Iran, however, there has been little
apparent progress in the negotiations. Iran has denied holding
substantive talks with the United States and has rejected the Trump
administration’s conditions as unreasonable. The war has raged on,
drawing in much of the Middle East, sending oil and gas prices
skyrocketing and fracturing Mr. Trump’s political support at home.
As
Mr. Trump strains to find an end to a conflict he originally mused
would last four to five weeks, he has alternately narrowed his aims —
arguing on Sunday that “regime change” in Iran had already been achieved
— and raised the prospect of escalation, ordering thousands more U.S.
troops to the Middle East, including Marines and Special Operations
Forces.
He has no plans because he
has no established goals. He never did. He started a war with on end
goals. He was encouraged in this by the yes-people who surround him.
They started a war and, even now, can't point to any accomplishments.
They just continue it and hope at some point they'll discover a way to
say, "It's over!"
Trump’s threats: Trump claimed
the US was in “serious discussions” with a “new” regime in Iran and
threatened to “completely obliterate” the country’s energy sources if “a
deal is not shortly reached.” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio later
claimed there were “fractures” within Iran’s leadership but declined to
name the specific people the US is negotiating with. Trump’s former
national security adviser dismissed claims the White House is negotiating with a more moderate regime as “just delusional.”
Tehran’s rebuttal: Contradicting both Trump and Rubio, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei
said there are currently no direct negotiations between the US and
Iran. Messages have only been relayed through intermediaries, he
claimed. The White House says Tehran’s pessimistic public comments do not reflect private messages being passed between the two sides.
Chump
lies about conversations all the time. And what happens when you lie
all the time? No one believes you. So people don't believe Chump's
talking to anyone in the Iranian government. And they don't believe
that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth would be sitting out press
briefings if he had anything worth sharing.
Once
mobilization begins and the war industry is activated, it is difficult
to turn back. The war machine is too vast and complex to stop. Now the
war against Iran is escalating and seems out of control. This is
evident, to begin with, in the words: Iran issued a harsh warning to the
United States yesterday that any ground operation against the country
will end with the "humiliating capture" of its troops, who will be "food
for the sharks of the Persian Gulf".
In this
context, the Pentagon has offered, as confessed yesterday by Karoline
Leavitt, White House press secretary, "several intervention options in
Iran and the president has not yet made a decision." In the Middle East
region, the United States already has over 8,000 deployed ground forces,
including paratroopers, marines, and special forces, but Trump has not
yet made a decision on the plans presented to him, which include taking
one or more islands and even an incursion beyond enemy lines. At the
moment, we do not know if Trump will choose one, several at once, or
none.
What we do know is that
he is not satisfied with that deployment and has asked for more. Another
ship for amphibious operations, the USS Boxer, set sail from Hawaii two
days ago to head to the Gulf region with thousands of marines on board.
It will be the second of its kind, as the USS Tripoli already arrived
here on Friday.
Some recall these days that
U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War began in 1960 with 900 military
advisors, then with 3,500 marines to secure Da Nang airport, and from
there to half a million soldiers fighting in 1969.
To
replace the aircraft carrier Gerald Ford, which is undergoing repairs
in Greek waters, the USS George Bush will also be deployed. Some claim
that in reality, the Gerald Ford was damaged by an Iranian missile
attack, while the United States maintains that there was a massive fire
in the laundry room.
Many journalists covering
Defense affairs in Washington have complained about the lack of
transparency: it has been 10 days since the last appearance of Hegseth
and Caine before the press regarding Iran. There has been no CENTCOM
press briefing since March 10, nor any daily Pentagon press conference.
Questions arise over US targets in Iran. There have been two schools bombed. ALJAZEERA looks at other targets:
In
the densely populated neighbourhoods of southern Tehran, the 11th
Criminal Investigation Base once stood as a mundane symbol of local law
enforcement. Its detectives investigated economic crimes, fraud and
petty thefts.
The building housed no ballistic
missiles, no uranium centrifuges and no military command centres. Today,
it is a crater. In the opening wave of the United States-Israel war on
Iran, warplanes wiped the local police station off the map.
It
was not an isolated incident. An investigation by Al Jazeera’s Digital
Investigations unit has verified that at least 75 internal security
sites were destroyed or damaged in bombardments by Israel and the US
from February 28 to March 10. The targeted facilities included local
police stations, criminal investigation headquarters, public security
offices and checkpoints operated by the Basij paramilitary force.
[. . .]
The
spatial distribution of the 75 verified strikes revealed a clear and
deliberate strategy. Warplanes bypassed isolated military installations
to hit the infrastructure Tehran uses to police its citizens.
The
capital alone absorbed 31 strikes, more than 40 percent of the total
targets. Sanandaj, the capital of Kurdistan province, suffered eight
strikes. The remaining targets were clustered tightly in major western
and central cities, including Isfahan, Kermanshah and Hamedan.
Meanwhile, Iran’s sprawling eastern and southeastern provinces remained
largely untouched by this campaign.
By
overlaying the strike coordinates with demographic maps, the
investigation shows a near-perfect alignment with urban density. More
than 70 percent of Iran’s population lives in these targeted western
urban areas.
At THE HILL, James Durso points out, "The
ghosts of Baghdad and Kabul should be enough to silence any serious
talk of sending American troops into Iran. Yet here we are again, with
voices in Washington and Tel Aviv whispering that only boots on the
ground can neutralize Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, its local allies and
its regional mischief.
On this morning's MEIDASTOUCH NEWS, Ben explains that Chump may, in fact, be abandoning the war.
Trump’s job-approval ratio at Silver Bulletin
on March 4 was at minus-12.5 percent. As of March 30, it’s at
minus-17.4 percent, more than 2 percent below the previous second-term
low. His average job-approval number stands at 39.7 percent, another
second-term low, while his average job-disapproval number is 57.1
percent, a second-term high. On average, 47.2 percent of Americans strongly
disapprove of Trump’s performance as president, still another
second-term high. Only 22.4 percent strongly approve of Trump’s job
performance, another second-term low. That’s an intensity gap of nearly
25 percent, or if you prefer, a ratio of more than two to one.
,
Individual polling trends mostly tell the same story. Fox News polls show Trump’s net job approval sliding from minus-14 percent at the beginning of March to minus-18 percent on March 23. Quantus Insights had him at minus-9 percent at the beginning of March and minus-15 percent on March 26. Reuters-Ipsos showed him sliding from minus-22 percent at the beginning of March to minus-26 percent on March 23. A new UMass survey
on March 25 set his job approval at 33 percent, around the same level
he was registering after the Capitol Riot. Polls that break out partisan
self-identification show the president’s job approval among
independents dropping into the 20s (25 percent at Quinnipiac, 29 percent at Economist/YouGov).
It’s tempting to attribute this sudden downward lurch to the Iran war. As Silver Bulletin documents in its polling averages,
Trump’s war of choice is quite unpopular: Currently 38.5 percent of
Americans support it and 53.9 percent are opposed. But the president is
bleeding support on other crucial issues as well. According to
Silver Bulletin, on “the economy” Trump’s net approval averages have
dropped to a second-term low of minus-22.5 percent, and on “inflation,”
he’s hit a really shocking second-term low of minus-35.9 percent.
,
In
terms of the rapidly approaching midterm elections, there’s a pretty
clear trend as well: The Democratic advantage in the generic
congressional ballot has hit 2025–2026 highs of 5.9 percent at RealClearPolitics and 5.4 percent at Silver Bulletin.
,
If
the war in Iran continues, along with elevated gas prices and other bad
economic news, there’s no reason to think the current free fall in
Trump’s popularity will do anything other than persist, at least until
the irreducible minimum of hardcore party-base support is reached.
There’s a reason prediction markets strongly favor a Democratic takeover
of the U.S. House (84.5 percent at Kalshi and 85 percent at Polymarket) and give even odds of the Senate flipping as well.
President
Trump’s approval rating dipped to a new low, and even fewer people
surveyed in a new poll said they support his administration’s war
efforts against Iran.
In a University of Massachusetts Amherst poll released Monday,
33 percent of respondents said they approve of the president’s job
performance. Of the 62 percent who said they disapprove of his work in
office, 53 percent expressed “strong” disapproval.
Exactly
33 percent of the poll’s respondents said they either “somewhat” or
“very much” associated themselves with Trump’s Make America Great Again
(MAGA) movement, including 77 percent of Republicans and 4 percent of
Democrats polled.
On the issue of the ongoing
conflict in the Middle East, only 29 percent of respondents said they
supported Trump’s handling of strikes against Iran. Sixty-three percent
disapproved of his job on this issue.
Today
on MORNING JOE, they addressed Chump's talk that he might be willing to
walk away and they addressed his threat of War Crimes.
As Americans pumped gas into their cars Monday, pennies were getting pumped right out of their pockets. A lot of pennies.
As the Iran conflict entered its fifth week, gas prices had increased about 35 percent since Feb. 28, with the national average hitting $4.02
per gallon on Tuesday. It was the largest increase in decades. The
conflict has threatened oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz,
which previously carried a quarter of the world’s seaborne oil.
Motorists
in every corner of the country are watching the numbers tick up and —
rarely — down. On Monday, New York Times reporters followed along as
they made their calculations.
At a Mobil station on Atlantic Avenue along a popular route to Kennedy
International Airport, Mohammed Razzak, an Uber driver, paid $70 on
Monday to top up his Chevrolet Suburban, a purchase that would have cost
about $53 earlier this year.
“This is too much,” Mr. Razzak, 48, said.
“Since the beginning of the war, it’s gone up almost $1 a gallon” — to
$3.69, from $2.79.
Uber has offered drivers increased discounts on gas, but Mr. Razzak, who has been driving for 14 years, said his bottom line has gotten steadily worse.
“Every
week, I’m spending $100 extra,” he said. “It’s not like my fare is
going up every day. We are suffering, all the drivers, all the people —
not the government. There’s nothing I can do. No choice.”
Many mornings, Penelope Cepeda drives her
mother to work and in the afternoon picks up her sister from school.
And she commutes to her own job or to college classes.
She
drives a relatively fuel-efficient Kia K4, but the skyrocketing gas
prices caused by the Iran war — more than a $1 hike per gallon in
Florida over the last month — have cut into an already tight budget.
Before the increases, Ms. Cepeda paid about $35 for a tank of gas. That
price is now more than $45. For Ms. Cepeda, who earns $12 an hour as
in-home caregiver, every penny counts.
“If you’re counting on the dollars that
you’re earning by the hour, it’s like, ‘Damn, 80 cents?’” said Ms.
Cepeda, a student at Valencia College who fills her tank two or three
times a month. “That’s money that I’m losing for my car bill. That’s
money that I’m losing for my water bill or my phone bill.”
Ms.
Cepeda, 20, gave up on plans to travel for spring break, but hopes gas
prices will stabilize by the summer so she can take a vacation.
“Maybe a cruise. Maybe something cheap. If cruises go up, then maybe we’re just going to stay here.”
Last week,New York Times columnist Bret Stephens penned an article that
captured the rah-rah-ness of the pro-war crowd and was breathtaking in
its short-sighted triumphalism. Headlined “The War Is Going Better Than
You Think,” Stephens called for “perspective on the panic over the war
in the Middle East” and scolded critics who depict the Iran war as “an
unprovoked and unnecessary attack on Iran, launched at Israel’s behest”
that is “already a foreign-policy fiasco that has put the global economy
at risk without any clear objective or endgame.” Not so, he cried.
His evidence? Comparisons to the past. In 1991, during Operation
Desert Storm against Saddam Hussein, the US-led forces lost 75 aircraft.
So far not a single piloted plane has been shot down over Iran. At the
start of the invasion of Iraq 12 years later, President George W. Bush
tried but failed to mount a strike to decapitate Saddam’s regime. This
time around, Donald Trump killed Iran’s supreme leader and many
high-ranking officials in the initial bombing. And in 2012, when Barack
Obama was president, the price of Brent crude oil hit $123 a barrel
($175 in 2026 dollars). So the price of $108 a barrel this past week
shouldn’t be such a bother.
Stephens presents a couple of other markers to suggest this war is
proceeding just fine, while acknowledging the Trump administration’s
“failures in planning, particularly its unwillingness to make a stronger
public case for war and get more allies on our side before the campaign
began”—which are hardly quibbles. Overall, his advice is to buck up and
not be Debbie Downers: “If past generations could see how well this war
has gone compared with the ones they were compelled to fight at a
frightening cost, they would marvel at their posterity’s comparative
good fortune. They would marvel, too, at our inability to appreciate the
advantages we now possess.”
Stephens is grasping at tactical straws. Perhaps the US military is
putting its hundreds of billions to effective use in terms of the
prosecution of the war, though we probably won’t know for certain until
there are after-action reports and investigations (if there are any). We
do already know that a missile strike that was attributed to US
military forces hit a girls’ school and killed about 175 Iranian
civilians, most of them students. But looking at the number of bombs
dropped or Iranian leaders killed or the fluctuation in the price of oil
is not the best way to evaluate this war—especially in these first
weeks of the conflict.
Wars are often not easy to judge because the chaos, conflict, and
disruption they trigger will yield consequences that last for years, if
not decades. It’s easy to gawk at Pentagon videos of Tomahawks raining
“death and destruction from above,” as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
calls it, and hail the war machine. Much tougher is perceiving the
ripples. We have no idea where all this violence will lead. It’s
theoretically possible we might end up with a less threatening regime in
Tehran and more stability in the Middle East, though that does seem
close to magical thinking. However, cheerleading the early stats and
proclaiming they bode well for the long run seems purposefully naive.
More than one major U.S. adversary is assisting Iran.
China
has been sharing intelligence with Iran since roughly two weeks into
the war, a “well-placed,” unidentified source “with knowledge” of the
situation told HUMINT’s Sasha Ingber. The military cooperation has been ongoing since at least March 10.
[. . .]
Several military officials told The Washington Post
on March 6 that Russia shared targeting details with Iran, offering the
locations of U.S. military assets such as warships and aircraft across
the Middle East. Over the weekend, European allies warned that Russia
was aiding Iran more than U.S. officials had let on. They underscored
that America’s latest Middle East conflict is intertwined with Russia’s
war against Ukraine, reported CBS News.
White
House press secretary Karoline Leavitt insisted Monday that the
conflict would be resolved in the coming weeks, though military
officials have indicated that the war could rage for months.
A broker for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly sought to invest
in major defense companies just weeks prior to the commencement of
Donald Trump’s war on Iran, a new report has alleged. According to three
people familiar with the matter who spoke to the Financial Times, a
Morgan Stanley broker representing Hegseth contacted investment firm
BlackRock in February about a potential multimillion-dollar investment
in its Defense Industrials Active ETF. On Feb. 28, Trump began
conducting joint strikes with Israel on Iran, killing Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and starting a new war in the Middle East.
Some video coverage of the war.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:
ICE Director intent on building warehouse system like “[Amazon] Prime, but with human beings”
“Cramming tens of thousands
of people into warehouses meant for packages, without the ventilation,
temperature control, plumbing, or sanitation systems necessary for human
habitation, would almost certainly exacerbate…deaths in custody,
assaults, and infectious disease outbreaks.”
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren
(D-Mass.) and Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), Ranking Member of the
House Judiciary Committee, led 52 members of Congress in a new
investigation into whether government contractors, real estate brokers,
and property owners are corruptly profiting from the White House’s
fast-tracked expansion of inhumane warehouse-based immigration detention
facilities. The lawmakers wrote to six companies, pressing them to
explain how much they expect to earn from the new detention warehouses,
their lobbying efforts to land these lucrative government contracts, and
more.
“These warehouses were built to hold products, not people…Given the
public’s grave concerns about this warehouse system, we request prompt
answers to questions about your involvement in the system,” wrote the lawmakers.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is working at breakneck
speed to implement its “Detention Reengineering Initiative,” a warehouse system to hold nearly 100,000 people by November 2026. Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons has described the vision as “[Amazon] Prime, but with human beings.”
Experts have warned that because of the speed of the operation, it
will be nearly impossible for ICE to build the infrastructure necessary
for human habitation in warehouses. Immigrants in existing detention
centers suffer from inhumane conditions, including lack of access to adequate medical care and poor-quality food.
“Placing thousands of people in warehouses that were never
intended to house human beings will only exacerbate these problems,”
wrote the lawmakers.
With the Trump administration planning to spend $38.3 billion on the
warehouse system, the project promises to be extremely profitable for
vendors, property owners, and real estate brokers. And for many of the
warehouse contracts, ICE appears to be circumventing the normal
competitive bidding processes.
ICE is using a Navy’s contracting program, diverting DoD resources
to avoid a competitive bidding process and avoid disclosing contract
details that would typically be made public, triggering concerns of
unnecessary costs and corruption.
For example, ICE paid $129 million for a facility in Georgia — nearly five times
the amount it was assessed for last year. The details of some of these
transactions have been kept secret, including through the use of non-disclosure agreements.
Additionally, some senior Trump officials have close ties to
immigration contractors that could profit from the warehouse system. For
example, David Venturella, who recently joined ICE after leaving the
GEO Group — a top ICE detention contractor — is leading the ICE division
that oversees detention contracts even though his former employer is
competing for lucrative warehouse contracts. Attorney General Pam Bondi
is also a former lobbyist for the GEO Group. Tom Homan, the “Border
Czar,” and Corey Lewandowski, a former Homeland Security official, have
reportedly helped contractors secure contracts to line their own
pockets.
The lawmakers asked the contractors and real estate firms to provide
clarity on: their roles in the warehouse expansions; their expected
profit margins from the project; whether they’ve donated to the Trump
campaign or cabinet officials; and whether they will commit to not
allowing their work to be used to facilitate inhumane conditions at
these detention centers, by April 13, 2026.
Senators Edward Markey (D-MA), Bernard Sanders (D-VT), Richard
Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.),
Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.)
joined in signing the letters.
Representatives Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), Becca Balint (D-Vt.),
Julia Brownley (D-Calif.), Sean Casten (D-Ill.), Joaquin Castro
(D-Texas), Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-Fla.), Judy Chu (D-Calif.),
Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.), Diana DeGette
(D-Colo.), Maxine Dexter (D-Ore.), Veronica Escobar (D-Texas), Maxwell
Frost (D-Fla.), Jesus García (D-Ill.), Sylvia Garcia (D-Texas), Dan
Goldman (D-N.Y.), Glenn Ivey (D-Md.), Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), Hank
Johnson (D-Ga.), Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Calif.), Robin Kelly (D-Ill.),
Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), April McClain Delaney (D-Md.), Jennifer
McClellan (D-Va.), Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.),
Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Joe Neguse (D-Colo.),
Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Ilhan Omar (D-M.N.), Deborah Ross
(D-N.C.), Patrick Ryan (D-N.Y.), Andrea Salinas (D-Ore.), Mary Gay
Scanlon (D-Pa.), Jan Shakowsky (D-Ill.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.),
Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Lauren Underwood
(D-Ill.), Delia Ramirez (D-Ill), Donald Beyer (D-V.A.), and James
Walkinshaw (D-Va.) joined in signing the letter.
