I have TIMESPACE, her first greatest hits. I have her three disc box set ENCHANTED -- got it at Best Buy the Tuesday it came out. Because they advertised the week before it came out in their weekly that they would have it and have it for about $15 less than list price. I have her live album THE SOUNDSTAGE SESSIONS.
I have all the solo albums -- including my favorites WILD HEART, ROCK A LITTLE and 24 KARAT GOLD. (I love all the solo albums, even STREET ANGEL, but those three are my favorites.)
So RHINO RECORDS is putting out a new Stevie Nicks best of:
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
So what do you think?
I can see buying the one disc for someone who doesn't really know Stevie's music.
But I wouldn't buy it myself.
I will be buying the three disc set.
I'm glad they're putting on "If You Ever Did Believe." I loved that song and long ago lost my PRACTICAL MAGIC CD. "Needles and Pins" is from PACK UP THE PLANTATION LIVE -- Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers. I wish they'd included "Insider" that Stevie also does with the band on that live album.
I could have done without "Circle Dance" -- a Vanessa Carlton duet on a Bonnie Raitt song.
What about "Sometimes It's A Bitch" which was actually a hit? Or "Has Anyone Written Anything From You" live from her Red Rocks concert (which is available on video)?
What I would really like to see is Stevie do an album like her "Gypsy" video for ROLLING STONE (just her at the piano) or her "Rhiannon" demo (just her at the piano) on ENCHANTED.
I'd like some stripped down Stevie doing 18 solid songs she's written that deserve a second listen. I'd start with "Juliet" which is an amazing song and really needs to be put on albums like these so that people can discover it.
1) "Juliet"
2) "For What It's Worth"
3) "Sister Honey"
4) "Wild Heart"
5) "Blue Water"
6) "Secret Love"
7) "Imperial Hotel"
8) "Outside the Rain"
9) "Jane"
10) "Lady"
11) "That Made Me Stronger"
12) "Beauty and the Beast"
13) "Think About It"
14) "Ghosts"
15) "The Dealer"
16) "Kick It"
17) "I Miss You"
18) "For What It's Worth"
Just Stevie performing them in a stripped down setting -- her and piano, her and acoustic guitar, maybe her and her backup singers.
Closing with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Friday, February 22, 2019. The Iraq War hits the 16 year mark next
month and people are still dying but how many people who want the
Democratic Party's 2020 presidential nomination appear to even be aware
that wars are dragging on?
Yesterday, we noted Burn Pits 360. Let's note them again
Burn Pits are a serious issue. They've done serious harm and people are suffering as a result. Some who are suffering are family members who have lost a loved one as a result of burn pits.
Let's drop back to a June 13, 2012 Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing;
Mark Udall is no longer in the Senate. What's the excuse of others?
We're gearing up for a presidential election in 2020 and the bulk of declared candidates are current members of Congress.
"Kamala Harris for the people." That's apparently her slogan. It's all over her website, the one where she's seeking the presidential nomination. All she really has, besides that bad slogan (that's not even working as a title for an ABC series), is a speech where she goes on and on and on about Dreamers -- they're not really voters, are they, Kamala? And then dips her toe into consumer debt before doing a single-sentence laundry list of various issues.
So Kamala's basing her current campaign for president around the issue of Dreamers -- people who cannot vote for her?
Don't say she's a dumb-dumb.
Search in vain at her site for the mention of burn pits or any veterans issue. She can go back to the suffragettes and their battle for the right to vote -- believe they've all died off by now, Kamala -- but she can't even acknowledge veterans and their families.
Now I support Dreamers and I'm for open borders. But I'm also a poli-sci major and realize that a speech that mentions Dreamers for over ten paragraphs and doesn't have a single-sentence about burn pits or issues that effect veterans isn't a very good speech if you're running for elected office in the US.
It's shiny! It's topical! It's just not addressing the primary needs of voters.
Now, yes, Kamala's website is a step up from Harry Braun's website where he explains he's against all immigration to the US, regardless of where the immigrant is coming from. His position is 'science,' you understand. Don't bother to point out to him that the US letting in immigrants or not really won't address the size of the global population (that's his reason for opposing all immigration).
If Kamala basing her campaign, so far, on Dreamers seems to be a poor election strategy, maybe she should team up with Robby Wells. What a ticket they'd make! He's sought the presidential nomination already via the Constitution Party and also as an independent candidate. This go round, he's trying for the Democratic Party's nomination. And what better way to scream, "Vote for me, America!," then by unveiling your plan to run the United States at a press conference in . . . Mumbai? Get those write-in ballots ready, folks.
I'm finding only one candidate's website that notes burn pits, US House Rep Tulsi Gabbard's website:
Tulsi is the only Iraq War veteran currently seeking the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. But that doesn't mean others couldn't step up on the issue. They choose not to. Kamala Harris, for example, offers a laundry list of causes but veterans or peace don't actually make the list, do they?
Unlike Kamala, candidate Marianne Williamson does note veterans at her campaign website:
Our
veterans are some of the best and brightest citizens we have. To be
willing to put their lives on the line so that the rest of us may
exercise our freedom is something I am in awe of. I have a deep sense of
gratitude for the women and men that serve in our armed forces. It
saddens me that they don’t always get the best care and attention that
they have earned. That’s why, if I am elected president, I will work
closely with veteran advocacy groups to put forth policies that matter
most to our nation's active duty service members and veterans.
Every
day, an average of 20 U.S. veterans commit suicide. We must not stop
working until every veteran and service member has access to the best
mental health care and community support. I will direct my VA Secretary
to make suicide prevention a top priority.
As
for health care, few veterans get the care they deserve, but when it
comes to women, the circumstances are most offensive. It’s time we
recognize and drastically improve services for women veterans.
Especially in light of the fact that women are taking on bigger roles
and responsibilities in our military, both in support and combat roles.
In fact, the number of men serving in the military is expected to
decrease over the next five years, while the number of women is expected
to continue to increase. Other than the Department of Defense itself,
the Veteran’s Administration
is the largest agency in our government. The women and men of the VA
are doing extraordinary work every day to care for our veterans and
their families. But we can and should do more.
When
our service members come home from service, it is critical that they
get the support they deserve. As our brave women and men of the military
are transitioning out of service and reintegrating back into society,
the right support can make all the difference during their transition
and in the ensuing months and years. Many veterans don’t even know about
the variety of services that are available to support them, nor do they
know how to take advantage of them. Solving this lack of outreach to
veterans will involve coordinating efforts between the military, the
veteran’s administration, and outside non-profit groups and community
centers.
Indeed,
organization and management will help. Former presidents and past
secretaries of the Department of Defense and the VA have made
commitments to help bridge the gap between the DoD and the VA for
transitioning veterans, and yet there is still no sustainable system to
share something as simple and critical as electronic health records.
When
these two departments don’t share the data, what happens is veterans
get lost in the transition from active duty back to civilian life. They
end up not getting the care they need. For example - only 60 percent of
all new veterans are registered for VA health care. National Guard
members and reservists struggle in their transition between DoD and the
VA. With so many different government agencies not sharing records,
these often struggle to obtain their medical and service records,
resulting in more delays in applying for VA benefits and services. We
have the technology to integrate these silos of information, but past
administrations and Congress have not delivered sustainable solutions.
The time is now to prioritize these fixes.
Veteran
homelessness is another regrettable, painful issue. Addressing this
starts with preventing veterans from becoming homeless in the first
place. The VA needs a more in-depth understanding of the number of
veterans and service members at risk for homelessness. That means
understanding who is coming home with PTSD, addiction, and other forms
of mental health issues. That means we need more studies and more
research into these topics. Many veterans have a hard time keeping
housing. Many veterans come home to a broken family. Veterans end up
going from place to place, and many can’t find long-term employment. A
more manageable system that studies the influences that cause
homelessness, and that tracks the needs of veterans, is morally
required.
The
future of our country and the world depends on our nation’s brave young
women and men to continue defending democracy at home and abroad. For
those who are willing to raise their hand and swear an oath to protect
and defend our way of life, we can and we must do a better job of
supporting their success during and after their great service and
sacrifices for our freedom.
Lastly,
one of the great ways to address this issue is to reduce the number of
wars that we fight in the first place. Please see my section on national
security for more details on my approach to creating peace in this
world, instead of violence.
Where does Julian Castro stand on veterans? Don't know, it's not on his campaign website. John Delaney includes this at his website "Fix the VA health care for our veterans." Did he roll over and go to sleep after typing that? It must have really tired him. How strong, how hard hitting.
His words are made all the weaker when you grasp he is a sitting member of Congress. So if he wanted to "fix the VA health care for our veterans," he could, in fact, do so. But looking at the last 110 bills he sponsored or co-sponsored, it become clear that fixing the VA is really not an issue for him.
It would, in fact, appear that putting up "Fix the VA health care for our veterans" up at his campaign site is the most he's done for veterans health care in the last few years.
And it's not like new issues are not emerging.
Yesterday, we noted Burn Pits 360. Let's note them again
Let's get America organized.
Dear friend,
We mentioned earlier this year that 2019 is going to be the year that we make major strides in our fight for those suffering from the toxic wounds of war. While we are working diligently on our end, we need your help to get the conversation moving in your community. The more we are having public discussions on this, the more we can see real advances in our collective cause.
That is why we want to encourage you to do a few things, but first, you need to know who your Member of Congress is. You can do that here.
1) Press your Member of Congress to hold a town-hall in their district.
2) Write to your Member of Congress to support proposed legislation.
3) Call your Member of Congress and demand they support veterans suffering from burn pits.
We will be hosting three townhalls this week with Congressman Joaquin Castro (TX-20), and are encouraging all of you to contact your Member of Congress to do the same.
Also, we are encouraging all of you to write to your Member of Congress to support legislation that is currently being proposed. Click on the link on #2 above to print the letter, sign, date, label, and stick it in the mail!
Let's make 2019 be the year that brings us past the finish line for those suffering from the toxic wounds of war. Let's get organized and fight for our veterans.
Thank you,
Le Roy & Rosie Torres
We mentioned earlier this year that 2019 is going to be the year that we make major strides in our fight for those suffering from the toxic wounds of war. While we are working diligently on our end, we need your help to get the conversation moving in your community. The more we are having public discussions on this, the more we can see real advances in our collective cause.
That is why we want to encourage you to do a few things, but first, you need to know who your Member of Congress is. You can do that here.
1) Press your Member of Congress to hold a town-hall in their district.
2) Write to your Member of Congress to support proposed legislation.
3) Call your Member of Congress and demand they support veterans suffering from burn pits.
We will be hosting three townhalls this week with Congressman Joaquin Castro (TX-20), and are encouraging all of you to contact your Member of Congress to do the same.
Also, we are encouraging all of you to write to your Member of Congress to support legislation that is currently being proposed. Click on the link on #2 above to print the letter, sign, date, label, and stick it in the mail!
Let's make 2019 be the year that brings us past the finish line for those suffering from the toxic wounds of war. Let's get organized and fight for our veterans.
Thank you,
Le Roy & Rosie Torres
Burn Pits are a serious issue. They've done serious harm and people are suffering as a result. Some who are suffering are family members who have lost a loved one as a result of burn pits.
Let's drop back to a June 13, 2012 Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing;
Senator Mark Udall: Sitting in the audience today is
Master Sergeant Jessey Baca a member of the New Mexico Air National
Guard and his wife Maria. [to them] Just give everybody a waive here,
you two. Master Sgt. Baca was stationed in Balad, Iraq and exposed to
burn pits. His journey to be here today was not easy. He has battled
cancer, chronic bronchitis, chemical induced asthma, brain lesions, TBI,
PTSD and numerous other ailments. Maria has traveled that difficult
road with him. They know first hand the suffering caused by burn pits
and they need to know the answers. It is because of them and so many
others like them that we are here today. Last year, I introduced S. 1798,
the Open Burn Pits Registry Act with Senator Corker. Representative
Todd Akin introduced it in the House. It is not a partisan issue. We
have each met with veterans and active duty members of the military and
they have told us how important it is that we act now. In both
Afghanistan and Iraq, open air burn pits were widely used at forward
operating bases. Disposing of trash and other debris was a major
challenge. Commanders had to find a way to dispose of waste while
concentrating on the important mission at hand. The solution that was
chosen, however, had serious risks. Pits of waste were set on fire --
sometimes using jet fuel for ignition. Some burn pits were small but
others covered multiple acres of land. Often times, these burn pits
would turn the sky black. At Joint Base Balad Iraq, over 10 acres of
land were used for burning toxic debris. At the height of its
operations, Balad hosted approximately 25,000 military, civilian and
coalition provision authority personnel. These personnel would be
exposed to a toxic soup of chemicals released into the atmosphere.
According to air quality measurements, the air at Balad had multiple
particulates harmful to humans: Plastics and Styrofoams, metals,
chemicals from paints and solvents, petroleum and lubricants, jet fuel
and unexploded ordnance, medical and other dangerous wastes. The air
samples at Joint Base Balad turned up some nasty stuff. Particulate
matter, chemicals that form from the incomplete burning of coal, oil and
gas garbage or other organic substances, volatile organic compounds
such as acetone and benzene -- benzene, as you all know, is known to
cause leukemia -- and dioxins which are associated with Agent Orange.
According to the American Lung Association, emissions from burning waste
contain fine particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide,
volatile organic compounds and various irritant gases such as nitrogen
oxides that can scar the lungs. All of this was in the air and being
inhaled into the lungs of service members. Our veterans have slowly
begun to raise the alarm as they learn why -- after returning home --
they are short of breath or experiencing headaches and other symptoms
and, in some cases, developing cancer. Or to put it more simply, by
Maria Baca, when she describes her husband's symptoms, "When he
breathes, he can breathe in, but he can't breathe out. That's the
problem that he's having. It feels like a cactus coming out of his
chest. He feels these splinters and he can't get rid of them." The
Dept of Army has also confirmed the dangers posed by burn pits. In a
memo from April 15, 2011, Environmental Science Engineering Officer, G.
Michael Pratt, wrote an air quality summary on Baghram Airfield. And I
would respectfully ask that the full memo be included in the record.
Referring to the burn pits near Baghram Airfield, he said there was
potential that "long-term exposure at these level may experience the
risk for developing chronic health conditions such as reduced lung
function or exacerbated chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease, asthma, atherosclerosis and other cardio pulmonary
diseases. Many of our service members are coming home with
these symptoms. I believe, like you do, Madam Chair, that we are
forever in debt for their service, so we must ask the question, "How did
these burn pits impact the health of our returning heroes?" This bill
is a step towards finding the answers we owe them. The legislation will
establish and maintain and Open Burn Pit Registry for those individuals
who may have been exposed during their military service. It would
include information in this registry that the Secretary of the VA
determines is applicable to possible health effects of this exposure.
develop a public information campaign to inform individuals about the
registry and periodically notify members of the registry of significant
developments associated with burn pits exposure. It is supported by
numerous groups including BurnPits 360,
Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Association of US Navy, Retired Enlisted
Association, the Uniformed Services Disabled Retirees and the National
Military Family Association. Madam Chair and Ranking Member Burr, thank
you for your attention to this important issue. I look forward to
working with both of you and members of your distinguished Committee on
this important legislation. Thank you and a pleasure once again to be
with you today.
Mark Udall is no longer in the Senate. What's the excuse of others?
We're gearing up for a presidential election in 2020 and the bulk of declared candidates are current members of Congress.
"Kamala Harris for the people." That's apparently her slogan. It's all over her website, the one where she's seeking the presidential nomination. All she really has, besides that bad slogan (that's not even working as a title for an ABC series), is a speech where she goes on and on and on about Dreamers -- they're not really voters, are they, Kamala? And then dips her toe into consumer debt before doing a single-sentence laundry list of various issues.
So Kamala's basing her current campaign for president around the issue of Dreamers -- people who cannot vote for her?
Don't say she's a dumb-dumb.
Search in vain at her site for the mention of burn pits or any veterans issue. She can go back to the suffragettes and their battle for the right to vote -- believe they've all died off by now, Kamala -- but she can't even acknowledge veterans and their families.
Now I support Dreamers and I'm for open borders. But I'm also a poli-sci major and realize that a speech that mentions Dreamers for over ten paragraphs and doesn't have a single-sentence about burn pits or issues that effect veterans isn't a very good speech if you're running for elected office in the US.
It's shiny! It's topical! It's just not addressing the primary needs of voters.
Now, yes, Kamala's website is a step up from Harry Braun's website where he explains he's against all immigration to the US, regardless of where the immigrant is coming from. His position is 'science,' you understand. Don't bother to point out to him that the US letting in immigrants or not really won't address the size of the global population (that's his reason for opposing all immigration).
If Kamala basing her campaign, so far, on Dreamers seems to be a poor election strategy, maybe she should team up with Robby Wells. What a ticket they'd make! He's sought the presidential nomination already via the Constitution Party and also as an independent candidate. This go round, he's trying for the Democratic Party's nomination. And what better way to scream, "Vote for me, America!," then by unveiling your plan to run the United States at a press conference in . . . Mumbai? Get those write-in ballots ready, folks.
I'm finding only one candidate's website that notes burn pits, US House Rep Tulsi Gabbard's website:
Key Points
- Tulsi has led efforts to help service members who have been exposed to burn pits while on active duty, along with their families
-
Tulsi has introduced and co-sponsored legislation to assist those who have been affected, and also serves as a member of the Congressional Burn Pit Caucus
-
Over 140,000 servicemembers and veterans have reported exposure to burn pits and toxic airborne chemicals.
-
Exposure to burn pits can produce serious and potentially life-threatening health effects, including neurological disorders, rare forms of cancer, lung diseases, and more—triggering some to call the crisis the ‘Agent Orange’ of the post-9/11 generation
Legislation
-
Tulsi introduced H.R. 5671 - Burn Pits Accountability Act, a bipartisan bill, to evaluate exposure to open burn pits and toxic airborne chemicals, and begin the process of ensuring proper care and services for the nation’s servicemembers and veterans
-
Tulsi is an original co-sponsor of H.R. 6027 - Family Member Access to Burn Pit Registry Act, which would allow family members to register in the burn pits registry on behalf of a deceased service member
Tulsi’s Statements/Video
-
Reps. Tulsi Gabbard, Brian Mast Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Evaluate US Military Burn Pits Exposure https://gabbard.house.gov/news/press-releases/reps-tulsi-gabbard-brian-mast-introduce-bipartisan-bill-evaluate-us-militar
-
Press conference demanding recognition and care for servicemembers and veterans exposed to toxic burn pits during their deployments https://gabbard.house.gov/news/press-releases/photos-video-reps-gabbard-ruiz-castro-demand-recognition-veterans-exposed-burn
-
Video: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Demands Answers and Recognition of Veterans Exposure to Burn Pits https://youtu.be/vgq44b0ViOg
-
Reps. Tulsi Gabbard, Brian Mast’s Burn Pits Legislation Gains Momentum https://gabbard.house.gov/news/press-releases/reps-tulsi-gabbard-brian-mast-s-burn-pits-legislation-gains-momentum
-
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard on Facebook: Burn Pits Caucus Meeting https://gabbard.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-tulsi-gabbard-facebook-burn-pits-caucus-meeting
-
Reps. Gabbard and Mast, IAVA Lead Bipartisan Bill to Evaluate US Troops Exposure to Toxic Burn Pits https://gabbard.house.gov/news/press-releases/photos-video-reps-gabbard-and-mast-iava-lead-bipartisan-bill-evaluate-us-troops
-
Reps. Tulsi Gabbard and Brian Mast, IAVA Demand Action to Fix GI Bill Payments, Address Toxic Burn Pit Exposure, Serve Female Veterans https://gabbard.house.gov/news/press-releases/photos-video-reps-tulsi-gabbard-and-brian-mast-iava-demand-action-fix-gi-bill
3rd Party Links
-
KITV on burn pits: https://youtu.be/39cxKopjJIM
-
Military Burn Pits: The New Agent Orange? https://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-anne-mercer/military-burn-pits-the-new-agent-orange_b_9322334.html
-
VA’s Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/burnpits/registry.asp
-
Tired of inaction, lawmakers, families plead for action on burn pits https://www.stripes.com/tired-of-inaction-lawmakers-families-plead-for-action-on-burn-pits-1.531584
Tulsi is the only Iraq War veteran currently seeking the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. But that doesn't mean others couldn't step up on the issue. They choose not to. Kamala Harris, for example, offers a laundry list of causes but veterans or peace don't actually make the list, do they?
Unlike Kamala, candidate Marianne Williamson does note veterans at her campaign website:
Providing Veterans With Their Much Deserved Support
Where does Julian Castro stand on veterans? Don't know, it's not on his campaign website. John Delaney includes this at his website "Fix the VA health care for our veterans." Did he roll over and go to sleep after typing that? It must have really tired him. How strong, how hard hitting.
His words are made all the weaker when you grasp he is a sitting member of Congress. So if he wanted to "fix the VA health care for our veterans," he could, in fact, do so. But looking at the last 110 bills he sponsored or co-sponsored, it become clear that fixing the VA is really not an issue for him.
It would, in fact, appear that putting up "Fix the VA health care for our veterans" up at his campaign site is the most he's done for veterans health care in the last few years.
And it's not like new issues are not emerging.
I recently met Sam Fortune, who served in Iraq twice. When he returned, he learned his water had been badly polluted by the very military he'd served.
He is one of tens of thousands.
Contrast Delaney's non-action as a member of the US Congress and his eight word statement at his campaign site with non-member of Congress Ken Nwadike Jr. who offers:
Here's Tulsi on regime change war:
Key Points
-
Tulsi is the leading voice in Congress calling for an end America's interventionist wars of regime change that have cost our nation trillions of dollars and thousands of lives, simultaneously creating more devastation, human suffering and refugees in the countries where U.S. regime change war is waged.
-
As an Iraq war veteran and a Major in the Army National Guard, Tulsi knows the true cost of war.
-
The result of interventions like Iraq and Libya only propagated more human suffering several times over, resulting in a failed state in Libya and creating a haven for terrorists seeking to establish a caliphate based on their exclusivist ideology.
-
United States' history of interventions impedes our ability to form relationships with countries that are skeptical of our intentions. Countries like North Korea or Iran believe their nuclear weapons are the only thing defending them from invasion.
-
Tulsi believes the United States would be far better off spending the trillions of dollars wasted in interventionist wars on more pressing domestic issues in America, like infrastructure, college debt, healthcare, etc.
-
Research shows the vast majority of Americans agree with Tulsi in her opposition to regime change war: “71 percent of Americans believed Congress should pass legislation that restrained military action. The survey shows that 86.4 percent believe the military should be used only as a last resort. Additionally, 63.9 percent of those polled felt that military aid, both money and weapons, should not be provided to regimes like Saudi Arabia—the West’s top ally in the Arab world.” https://nationalinterest.org/feature/foreign-policy-populism-the-final-frontier-24248
-
Tulsi stands against torture: "I strongly oppose the use of torture and 'enhanced interrogations'. In 2015, I voted for H.R. 1735, including the amendment to the 2016 NDAA, codifying President Obama’s executive order banning enhanced interrogation/torture methods. This ban solidified our commitment to United States law and international agreements."
Legislation
-
H.R. 608 Stop Arming Terrorists Act- Legislation that serves to galvanize the anti-war movement and the opposition to regime change policies that characterize our present foreign policy
-
H.Amdt.636 to H.R.5515: This amendment to bill H.R.5515 removes the clause which allows the US military to go to war without Congressional approval and only provide an after-the-fact report on the operation.
-
H.R. 4108 - To prohibit the use of funds for the provision of assistance to Syrian opposition groups and individuals: This bill would prohibit the US from continuing to provide support in any form to any group involved in the overthrow of the Syrian government.
-
H.R. 1735 - Including the amendment, Section 1045, Limitations on Interrogation Techniques, banning torture and "enhanced interrogations"
Tulsi’s Statements/Video
-
“I've been saying for years that the overthrow of Gaddafi in Libya undermined the world's efforts towards nuclear non-proliferation. North Korea's statements have made it very clear that this is the case.” https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/997282235085541376
-
“#NDAA Section 1225 gives after-the-fact license to continuing U.S. military actions in Yemen supporting Saudi Arabia which have resulted in mass starvation, tens of thousands of dead civilians, and blockades causing one of the worst humanitarian disasters in history.” https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/999317978192760837
-
“US record of regime change hurts NK diplomacy”
https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/foreign-policy/334839-us-record-of-regime-change-hurts-nk-diplomacy -
Tulsi Gabbard speaks out against the regime change war in Syria https://youtu.be/z9KU3R9VpWA
- Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Urges Congress to Oppose Authorization for War Against Iran https://youtu.be/POq5Rbxff2E
3rd Party Links
-
“Tulsi Gabbard: ‘We Need to Learn from Iraq’” https://thehill.com/homenews/house/328216-gabbard-we-need-to-learn-from-iraq
-
“Tulsi Gabbard Hits Mainstream Media With Hard Facts on US Regime Change Policy”
https://www.mintpressnews.com/tulsi-gabbard-hits-mainstream-media-with-hard-facts-on-us-regime-change-policy/236440/ -
The Hill Op-ed: “Tulsi Gabbard: If Peace Is Our Goal, Then U.S. Foreign Policy Must Change” https://gabbard.house.gov/news/in-the-news/if-peace-our-goal-us-foreign-policy-must-change
-
Tulsi Gabbard on the Administration’s Push for War in Syria
https://www.thenation.com/article/tulsi-gabbard-on-the-administrations-push-for-war-in-syria/
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard says being confronted with "the high human cost of war" while serving in Iraq influenced her anti-interventionist stance.
"I was struck with the names and the faces of my brothers and sisters who were paying the price for this war" abcn.ws/2DPnMZC
From Elizabeth Warren's website:
From endless wars that strain military
families to trade policies that crush our middle class, Washington’s
foreign policy today serves the wealthy and well-connected at the
expense of everyone else.
For too long, our economic policies have left workers with the short end of the stick. We need to strengthen labor standards – and then fight to enforce them. That’s why Elizabeth will oppose Trump’s new “NAFTA 2.0” unless he produces a better deal for America’s working families. It’s time to stop prioritizing corporate profits over American paychecks.
A strong military should act as a deterrent so that most of the time, we won’t have to use it. We must continue to be vigilant about the threat of terrorism, but it’s time to bring our troops home – and make sure they get support and benefits they’ve earned.
We should also leverage all the tools of our national power, not just our military might. That means cutting our bloated defense budget and ending the stranglehold of defense contractors on our military policy. It means reinvesting in diplomacy and standing with our allies to advance our shared interests. It means new solutions to new global challenges, from cybersecurity to the existential threat posed by climate change.
Our strength abroad is generated here at home. Policies that undermine working families in this country also erode our strength in the world. It’s time for a foreign policy that works for all Americans, not just wealthy elites.
For too long, our economic policies have left workers with the short end of the stick. We need to strengthen labor standards – and then fight to enforce them. That’s why Elizabeth will oppose Trump’s new “NAFTA 2.0” unless he produces a better deal for America’s working families. It’s time to stop prioritizing corporate profits over American paychecks.
A strong military should act as a deterrent so that most of the time, we won’t have to use it. We must continue to be vigilant about the threat of terrorism, but it’s time to bring our troops home – and make sure they get support and benefits they’ve earned.
We should also leverage all the tools of our national power, not just our military might. That means cutting our bloated defense budget and ending the stranglehold of defense contractors on our military policy. It means reinvesting in diplomacy and standing with our allies to advance our shared interests. It means new solutions to new global challenges, from cybersecurity to the existential threat posed by climate change.
Our strength abroad is generated here at home. Policies that undermine working families in this country also erode our strength in the world. It’s time for a foreign policy that works for all Americans, not just wealthy elites.
Where are the others?
Pete Buttigieg is an Afghanistan War veteran but he doesn't note veterans -- or their issues -- at his campaign website. He doesn't note war and peace. He does note his biography so apparently he's running a personality based campaign. Give him a People's Choice Award already and get him off the stage if that's all he has to offer.
Unless your name is Bernie Sanders, what's your excuse?
Bernie gets an excuse because he didn't formally declare until this week.
But one week's about all you're going to get, Bernie.
Now over a decade ago, Ava and I began covering these websites and noting that this is your online office. You should have the material there. If you don't have the material, you're not interested in the issue. Unlike a physical office, you can't claim, "We ran out of hand outs on that."
These are your online offices and they are where you get your information out.
The main information that candidates are currently getting out: We be greedy whores.
You're running for public office. Yes, you need donations. But the splash page demanding money and/or e-mail addresses before citizens can access your website portray you as greedy, money grubbing politicians. It's time to move past that model. Ava and i covered all those years ago when it began popping up.
It's past time to realize you can ask for money in other ways -- including a banner at the top of a page. Ava and I went head to head with Hillary's staff over this issue in 2008. All these years later, people still haven't learned? Elizabeth Warren has learned. She's doing a donation at the bottom of each page. Good for her.
Bad for Michael E. Arth -- his web site is nothing but confusing and little more than a curiosity.
That's actually true of too many of the men running for the nomiation.
What we're seeing -- and great for women on this but it doesn't speak well for male candidates -- is that three women running for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination -- Tulsi Gabbard, Marianne Williamson and Elizabeth Warren -- can address the issue of war and peace but so many men can't.
AP gushes that Senator Cory Booker is showing voters he "can get tough." Can he get tough? Was he tough in the Iraq War? Oh, he didn't serve. Tulsi did but he didn't. But he's tough guy. He's not some bald softie, AP wants you to know, he's tough boy. He played solider in the sandlot back in first grade. AP insists he's "ready to fight." Good to know. Good to know he's ready to fight long after he's too old to join the military. You go, Cory, you tough little boy of 49-years, you go.
Do you have to serve in the military to be president? No, not at all.
But don't play tough guy and try to big-boy the country when the reality is you're not tough at all, you're just real good at serving corporations and passing the way you step on We The People as being tough.
Andrew Yang's got a lot of issues -- a lot:
The Freedom Dividend
Combat Climate Change
Reduce Mass Incarceration
Opioid Crisis
LGBTQ Rights
Foreign Policy First Principles
Gun Safety
Paid Family Leave
Support for the Arts
Control the Cost of Higher Education
Pathway to Citizenship (Make Them Earn It)
Southern Border Security
Support the DREAM Act
Right to Privacy/Abortion and Contraception
Campaign Finance Reform
Fight for Equal Pay
Promote Vocational Education
Carbon Fee and Dividend
Increase Teacher Salaries
Early Childhood Education for All
Legalize Marijuana
Make Puerto Rico a State
Value-Added Tax
Hold Pharmaceutical Companies Accountable
Human-Centered Capitalism
Invest in America’s Mental Health
American Journalism Fellows
News and Information Ombudsman
Reduce Harm to Children Caused by Smartphones
Every Cop Gets a Camera
NCAA Should Pay Athletes
Nuclear Launch Decisions
Limit Bureaucracy in the Federal Workforce
Local Journalism Fund
Provide Basic Banking Services through the Post Office
American Exchange Program
Prevent Corruption among Federal Regulators
Closely Monitor Mental Health of White House Staff
Free Marriage Counseling for All
Automatically Sunset Old Laws
Prosperity Grants
Prevent Airlines from Removing Customers
Improve the American Scorecard
Increase Assistance for Single Parents
Fund Medical Technology Innovation
Fund Autism Intervention
Rebuild American Infrastructure
Reduce Student Loan Burden
Medicare for All
Expand Access to Medical Experts
Support the Revival of Earmarks
Make it Easier to Save for Retirement
Free Financial Counseling for All
Make Community College Affordable for All
Life-Skills Education in All High Schools
Modernize Military Spending
Make it Easy for Americans to Move for Work
Implement Mandatory Paid Leave Policy
Ease the Transition to Self-Driving Vehicles
Capital Gain/Carried Interest Tax
File Income Taxes
Financial Transaction Tax
Tort Reform/Reasonableness Dismissals
American Mall Act
Pathway to Citizenship
Entice High-Skill Individuals
Zoning
Algorithmic Trading/Fraud
Nuclear Energy
Modernize Voting
Modern Time Banking
Economic Crime
Media Fragmentation
Making Taxes Fun
Net Neutrality
Regulate AI and other Emerging Technologies
Robo-Calling Text Line
Peace doesn't seem to be one of them. How are you going to end the wars, Andrew?
Salah Nasrawi (AHRAM) maintains:
Backed by a US-led International Coalition, the Iraqi security forces have now almost completely dismantled the Islamic State (IS) group that had earlier seized vast tracts of land in Iraq and Syria and declared a “Caliphate.”
US-backed Syrian opposition forces have launched a “final battle” to capture the last small pocket of land held by IS, effectively bringing an end to the group’s territorial ambitions in Syria.
The defeat of IS marks an important victory, and as the group’s territory has shrunk, its leadership structure collapsed, and the number of its fighters dwindled, the future of the terror group remains anybody’s guess.
With this comes the question of what to do with the US-led coalition forged to defeat the group and in particular with the thousands of US soldiers in Iraq and Syria after the end of IS’s territorial control.
The Iraq War hits the 16 year mark next month. If you don't have a plan to end it, why the hell are you running for president?
And, no, "more of the same" is not a plan. "Rinse, lather and repeat" may work for shampoos, it doesn't work for wars.
As we noted Saturday, TRT WORLD reported:
Roughly 12,000 civilians have been killed in the US-led airstrikes in Iraq and Syria in four years, a human rights commission said on Saturday.
The Iraqi High Commission for Human Rights said in a statement that coalition forces’ airstrikes killed 11,800 civilians — including 2,300 minors and 1,130 women — in the last four years.
The statement also said that 8,000 civilians have been injured in these airstrikes, calling for an explanation on these figures.
The wars need to end. If you don't know how to end them, maybe you shouldn't be running for President of the United States?
The following sites updated:
