Please go read Elaine's "Bruce Springsteen's NEBRASKA" from last night. I love it when she writes about music. In fact, I miss our theme posts we used to do where we'd all write about an artist or our favorite album or a poem. But Elaine made me recall all I loved about NEBRASKA and, I agree, it is a great album.
News right now would include that the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame has started online voting for the next round of inductees.
Who has to be inducted?
I'd argue three or must inductees: Cyndi Lauper, Billy Idol and Oasis. I'd argue that they have lasting significant work and they had an impact on the music scene and many people followed copying them.
Chubby Checker? I was going to say take a pass on him. He can be inducted at another time because he's dead . . .
He's not dead. I went to WIKIPEDIA to count his top forty hits on the pop and R&B charts -- 23 -- and discovered he was still alive. So that change it for me on him. If he can be inducted while he's alive that means a lot more and I would certainly advocate for him being inducted. He's a godfather of rock and roll and, again, 23 hits, Id move him to the must inductees column.
Mariah Carey? If not this year, then next. She's an original. The huge switch up she did in the second half of the 90s changed the way everyone sings. She's a pioneer. I'm not going to count her hits -- I'm sure it's well over 60. She's been a huge influence and a pioneer. This year would be fine, next year would be okay with me as well.
The White Stripes?
My attitude is pass. Jack White's done nothing of value since he broke up the group except for the Bond song with Alicia Keys. That's it. The White Stripes were not together that long. They didn't have that many great things. Jack and Meg were married but passed themselves off as brother and sister. That's still creepy. So, no. I love "Seven Nation Army" and even their cover of "I Don't Know Just What To Do With Myself" but that's not enough to get into the Hall.
Joy Division and New Order? Don't feel it's pressing this year. Modern English belongs in the Hall before Joy Division gets in.
Outkast is a pioneering group and they've earned their place in the Hall but it could be next year and I'd be okay with that
Soundgarden belongs in but Chris Cornell's dead and I don't see why their induction has to be this year. I loved that band and they're great but, again, don't see the pressing need for it to be this year.
Joe Cocker. Pass. He's not unique -- not even due to John Belushi parodying him on SNL. He died over ten years ago. He was a singer. He was a White siner who tried to imitate Black singers and I never felt he added unique and was just a rip-off. He had no real impact in the US. He had a number one hit in the early eighties and that didn't interest the country in him or revive his career. Prior to that? He had two top ten hits.
Three albums went gold. Just gold. One was a live one, two were studios, The two were in 1969 and the live was 1970. He just didn't have an impact here. No million seller. No multi-million seller. No one was trying to ape Joe Cocker in this country. He released at least 61 albums. Only three went gold. Nothing went gold after 1970. Nothing went platinum.
We realize, don't we, that Diana Ross is not in the Hall as a solo performer, right? She's in for her leadership of the Supremes. As a solo artist, she's had six gold albums and two platinum. On the pop, adult contemporary, dance or R&B charts in the US, she's hit the top forty with 63 songs.
She's an icon and she changed music and was a huge influence. And she's not in but we're going to let Joe Cocker get in with his bad Blackface minstrel show?
Phish?
Great live band but no real impact in the recording field Maybe someday but it shouldn't be this year. (They're men, I'm sure they'll get in this year but they shouldn't.)
Bad Company? Sure. Right after the Archies get in.
The Black Crows? Love "She Talks To Angels" and got drunk to that song many times. But is that really enough for inclusion into the Hall?
Where's Til Tuesday? That's a pioneering band that has a legacy.
But it's fronted by a woman. And the Hall remains sexist.
14 nominees. One band -- White Stripes with Meg as the drummer -- two solo singers Cyndi and Mariah.
Still sexist.
Tori Amos was yet again not nominated. She's been eligible for the Hall forever. Nirvana, one of her peers, got inducted in 2014. She's still not in. And for years, we would bemoan that. However, it's really not happening now. She's exhausted us with one garbage album after another -- that does include her new music to go with her children's book. We're all tired of her music. And we're tired of her. A feminist who doesn't work with women.
This month, the Oscar for best short documentary went to THE ONLY GIRL IN THE ORCHESTRA about bassist Orin O'Brien who, in 1966, became the first female musician in the New York Philharmonic's Orchestra. 1966.
Yet 'feminist' Tori has done how many tours and all the musicians on stage with her are always men.
She should have addressed that decades ago. It makes all her 'goddess' talk and all her pretense at being a feminist a joke. And again, you have to back to 2002 for a great album. She keeps releasing them and they get worse and worse with each release and sell less and less. She didn't lose her fans, she ran them off.
Last nominee, Mana? They've had three monster selling albums. Not my favorite band but they've earned a place in the Hall.
Closing with C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"
“With everything going on, we’re gonna be paranoid,” Somarriba said. “You see this serious car, and I’m like, ‘Oh my God, what’s going on?’ But it was way too much. It’s one thing to see it once or twice, but it was just something that we would see almost daily.”
But she did not expect that federal agents would soon pull them over, break through the windows of their white Chevy Silverado, drag Ruiz Rodriguez and his brother Cesar from the vehicle and sweep them to a federal immigration jail in Tacoma after injuring the brothers with a Taser and a rifle.
The Ruiz Rodriguezes are migrants from Nicaragua; Somarriba was born in Miami.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol agents have been working in the Inland Northwest — as they have across the country — with agencies as far-flung as the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to detain and deport migrants. It’s part of President Donald Trump’s chaotic effort to rid the country of immigrants the administration says are here illegally.
“As Secretary of the Navy, you could make programmatic decisions that would increase DoD’s reliance on companies in which you are invested. To mitigate that conflict, you should divest your holdings in defense contractors.”
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, wrote to Mr. John Phelan, nominee to be Secretary of the Navy, with concerns regarding his “serious conflicts of interest,” given his financial investments in defense contractors. To address her concerns, Senator Warren asked Mr. Phelan to make a number of commitments related to his conflicts of interest ahead of the committee vote on his nomination.
As Secretary of the Navy, Mr. Phelan could make programmatic decisions that would increase the Department of Defense’s (DoD) reliance on companies in which he is invested or with which he has close relationships. These ties to various defense contractors, including Dell Technologies, Palantir, and Red Call Partners, raise serious concerns about his potential biases in making programmatic decisions for the military.
Mr. Phelan has investments worth over $50 million in Dell Technologies, which has a $2.5 billion contract to provide software services to the U.S. Navy, alongside other lucrative DoD contracts. Since January 2024 alone, he has earned over $5 million in capital gains and dividends from that investment. Mr. Phelan also has investments in other defense contractors, like National Resilience, a biomanufacturing company that has a $410 million DoD contract, and Woolpert, which provides school construction services for DoD.
The nominee also founded MSD Acquisition Corp., which has promoted Phelan’s “extensive and deep relationships” with Palantir and other companies in which he has invested. From his Palantir stock alone, Mr. Phelan recently earned over $5 million in capital gains.
“Even if you have sold your Palantir investments, your relationship with the company could still bias your decision-making toward assisting Palantir in its current push for more DoD contracts,” said Senator Warren.
Mr. Phelan also holds a multi-million-dollar stake in Red Cell Partners, a venture capital firm that is heavily invested in defense technology, has contracts with DoD, and has a history of hiring former senior defense officials, including former Defense Secretary Mark Esper. Red Cell aims to increase DoD’s reliance on artificial intelligence (AI), and Phelan’s Red Cell assets include investments in multiple defense-tech AI companies.
Senator Warren urged the nominee to divest any remaining defense contractor investments before taking office and not repurchase stock in these contractors while serving as the Secretary of the Navy. She also asked him to recuse himself from particular matters involving his former clients and employers for four years after serving in the Navy role, as many Biden appointees did. Lastly, Senator Warren asked Mr. Phelan to commit not to lobby DoD or work for companies that do business with DoD for four years after leaving office.
“The rampant revolving door of former government leaders lobbying the agencies they once led, while their government relationships remain fresh, erodes Americans’ faith in the federal government…By making these commitments, you would increase Americans’ trust in your ability to serve the public interest during your time at DoD — rather than the special interests of political allies and private sector companies,” concluded Senator Warren.
Senator Warren has sought to protect servicemembers and national security by pushing defense nominees to resolve their conflicts of interest:
- In March 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to Deputy Defense Secretary Nominee Stephen Feinberg, urging him to recuse himself from all matters related to Ligado Networks, which has a pending $39 billion lawsuit against the Department of Defense (DoD) over highly sought-after telecommunications spectrum space that the military has said is “essential for its various satellite communications, radars and navigation systems” usage.
- In March 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to Mr. Emil Michael, nominee for Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, with concern over his history of inappropriate behavior at work, his attacks on journalists and public accountability, and his ties to technology companies that may seek contracts with the Department of Defense.
- In February 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to Mr. Stephen Feinberg, nominee for Deputy Secretary of the Department of Defense, ahead of his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, pressing him to explain his “serious conflicts of interest” and his track record of mismanagement.
- In January 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to Mr. Michael Duffey, nominee for Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment of the Department of Defense, ahead of his confirmation hearing, with serious concerns about his record, which include violating the law, disregarding congressional authority, and his involvement in Project 2025.
- In January 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to Mr. Pete Hegseth, nominee for Secretary of the Department of Defense, regarding his ethics conflicts ahead of the Senate’s consideration of his nomination. Mr. Hegseth’s household’s ownership of stock in several defense contractors and his unwillingness to commit to post-employment restrictions he previously advocated for at his confirmation hearing were particularly troubling for the role of Secretary of Defense.
- In March 2024, Senator Elizabeth Warren secured ethics commitments from Douglas Schmidt, ahead of his confirmation to be the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) for the Department of Defense.
- In June 2023, Senator Elizabeth Warren and representative Andy Kim reintroduced the Department of Defense Ethics and Anti-Corruption Act, to limit the influence of contractors on the military, constrain foreign influence on retired senior military officers, and assert greater transparency over contractors and their interaction with DoD.
- In July 2021, Senator Elizabeth Warren secured agreements to four-year recusals from former clients’ and employers’ party matters from then-Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall and then-USD(R&E) Heidi Shyu.
- In January 2021, Senator Elizabeth Warren secured a commitment from General Lloyd Austin III, then-nominee for Secretary of Defense, to extend his recusal from Raytheon Technologies for four years and to not seek a position on the board of a defense contractor or become a lobbyist after his government service.
###