While
there's no shortage of Bruce Springsteen classics, ‘The Boss' is
delighting fans with even more music in the pipeline. This summer, he'll
be releasing "lost" music for the first time since 1998, when the Hall
of Famer released his "Tracks" boxed set of unreleased material.
However, this time, he's serving up seven full previously unheard albums
with "Tracks II: The Lost Albums." Here's everything to know about
Bruce Springsteen's latest project.
Take a listen to The Boss and his best tracks, from the upbeat "Born to Run" to the slow ballad, "The River"
On
June 27, Springsteen will unveil "Tracks II: The Lost Albums,"
including 83 songs across seven CDs (or nine vinyl records), 74 of which
have never been heard by the public, according to an announcement the
rock legend made Thursday. All of the songs were originally recorded
between 1983 and 2018.
"I often
read about myself in the ‘90s as having some sort of ‘lost' period or
something. Not really, really I was working the whole time," Springsteen
said in a video announcing the project. "During the pandemic, what I
did for that period of time was I finished everything I had in my vault.
So this is ‘Tracks II.' ‘The Lost Albums' are records that were full
records, some of them even to the point of being mixed, and not
released. For one reason or another, something I felt was missing from
some of them, or they just didn't feel complete at the time."
Some
of those songs, you recognize I'm sure. "My Hometown," for example, I
bet everyone knows. So that'll be an earlier version before he reworked
the songs for later release. I like the idea. I wasn't that keen on
TRACKS. I think Elaine made a great point recently when she wrote about
Bruce's NEBRASKA:
His sixth great album for me is the boxed set LIVE/1975-85. I'm not big on
all of his re-releases which come off to me as mere product. But
LIVE/1975-1985 came after the huge success (BORN IN THE USA) and they
probably did want to cash in. But at fifty bucks (that's what I
remember paying for the vinyl edition), they knew they had to do
something great and they picked great performances. His "Fire" rivals
the Pointer Sisters' version while "Rosalita" has never been better --
studio or live -- and "Candy's Room" demonstrates that drama he can
provide live. There are not a lot of multi-disc albums that need to be.
Sorry, but it is true. A lot of boxed sets really were unneeded. But
LIVE/1975-85 really is a great album and a classic boxed set. (Everyone
of the Joni Mitchell boxed sets -- the archive ones -- has been worthy
of release and I mention that because someone will wonder, "Was that a
slam at Joni?" No, it was not.)
That
set, the live set, really was something. It was amazing and it stands
up as one of his classic albums. A lot of live albums aren't. They're a
quick way to make some fast money. And you get it because you try to
get everything by the artist you love. But you get it and then you just
quickly stop listening.
Springsteen
has been talking about a second edition of the compilation for years.
In 2017, he told Rolling Stone that he was working on a second box set.
Fans
will have to wait for more details from “The Boss.” If you sign up
through the registration form on his website, it tells you to return to
the site on April 3. Perhaps that is when a release date and tracklist
will be revealed.
It has been over two years
since Springsteen’s last release. He dropped Only the Strong Survive on
November 11, 2022, which was a cover album. It was his second album full
of covers after 2006’s We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Sessions.
I'll
add I have no idea why they are calling it TRACKS II or TRACKS
anything. TRACKS, the original, wasn't a big hit. 'It sold a million
copies!' Not really. It's certified platinum in the US and that means
one million units -- kind of. It was four CDs or four cassettes.
Which means TRACKS sold 250,000 copies in the US. Multi-volume releases
go gold or platinum based on how much sold and how many discs. So four
discs means each copy of TRACKS that sold counted as four copies.
Be sure to read Elaine's "If you don't know about Fleetwood Mac, don't write about them" -- she's calling out an idiot who decided to write about Fleetwood Mac's RUMOURS without even knowing what songs were on the album -- and the idiot got paid for that piece of bad writing.
Friday, April 4, 2025. Chump tanks the economy, right wing conspiracy
nut whispers in Chump's ear, protests gear up for tomorrow, and much
more.
Starting with news of an action. This
Saturday. Tyler, Texas will be participating in the Hands Off action at
the intersection of Broadway and Shiloh Road -- where the Barnes &
Noble parking lot is, people will be gathering at 3:00 pm to tell the
government hands off. You can visit this webpage for more information:
Donald Trump and Elon Musk think this country belongs to them. We are fighting back!
They're
taking everything they can get their hands on—our health care, our
data, our jobs, our services—and daring the world to stop them. This is a
crisis, and the time to act is now.
🚨 On Saturday, April 5th, we're taking to the streets to fight back with a clear message: Hands off! 🚨
This
mass mobilization day is our message to the world that we do not
consent to the destruction of our government and our economy for the
benefit of Trump and his billionaire allies. Alongside Americans across
the country, we are marching, rallying, and protesting to demand a stop
the chaos and build an opposition movement against the looting of our
country.
A core principle behind all
Hands Off! events is a commitment to nonviolent action. We expect all
participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with
those who disagree with our values.
These actions will be taking place across the country. Mike noted the action at his website last night and added, "I loved being in Texas and campaigning. I loved the people of Texas.
Tyler was a great place and I spent a week there while speaking in
Tyler, in Kilgore and in Longview. I'm so glad that Tyler's going to
show their strength on Saturday. I applaud you and I'm there with you
in spirit."
So that's tomorrow. Today? Good morning and, if you have one, how was your morning cup of coffee? Lee Moran (HUFFINGTON POST) notes:
Donald Trump’s new trade war will likely mess with your cup of joe.
The
price of coffee could be set to soar for Americans after the president
on Wednesday announced tariffs on countries worldwide, including steep
rates on Brazil, Colombia and Indonesia ― from where the U.S. buys the
majority of its unroasted coffee beans.
The
move prompted an immediate backlash online with critics pointing out
America’s minimal coffee-growing capacity, due to the climate, which
makes the importation of beans so important.
If you think about politics traditionally, Trump’s tariffs don’t make
sense. Presidents’ political fortunes are generally tied to the
strength of the economy, so they can be expected not to take actions
that almost all economists predict will cause economic pain, both short
and long term. So if Trump is willing to hurt the economy, he must be
getting something he wants even more in return.
That thing is power. With tariffs, Trump can exercise a kind of
corruption that the country hasn’t experienced in some 150 years—a kind
of control that is ultimately incompatible with both democracy and
prosperity.
With tariffs, Trump is poised to trade a strong economy for one run on loyalty and retribution. Trump, a president who rules like a mob boss while claimingvastnewpowers, is transforming the government into a tool of reward and punishment. Already, prosecutions against Trump’s friends are being dropped, while those who have crossed him find themselves the target of vindictive executive orders. Media critical of Trump are underinvestigation by a weaponized Federal Communications Commission, while universities are being bullied into shutting down
free speech. Tariffs will scale this weaponization across the entire
economy. Viewed in this light, Trump’s willingness to sacrifice the
economy in exchange for control over it makes perfect sense.
Even those close to Trump see this trade for what it is. “Tariffs are
a tool the president enjoys because it’s personal power,” Rep. Ryan
Zinke (R-Mont.), who served in Trump’s first-term cabinet, toldHuffPost Tuesday. “It’s personal―he doesn’t have to go through Congress. He can exercise personal power.”
But history shows that an economy run on favors and grievances is ultimately a poor one. “If
you look around the world, it’s really clear that the places that are
rich have good governments,” says John Joseph Wallis, an economic
historian at the University of Maryland. “What Trump is doing is not
governing well. He’s like a third world dictator. He’s trying to behave
that way.”
Wallis’ research focuses on understanding why fairer political
systems tend to create the strongest economies. His conclusion is that
the answer lies in allowing everyone to operate by the same set of
rules—what are known as impersonal or general laws. Just as American
democracy was only truly realized by the 14th Amendment’s promise of
equality and the expansion of voting rights to all citizens, an advanced
capitalist society requires that every person and company operate under
the same set of financial rules. The rules do not necessarily have to
be unbound, laissez-faire capitalism without redistribution, but the rules and regulations must be evenly enforced.
Betty notes, "America has foolishly let an idiot
direct traffic and now wants to wonder how we ended up with one fender
bender after another at the school cross walk." She's absolutely correct. I would add though that he's
clearly bankrupting the country. After all of the times he's had to
declare bankruptcy, you have to be really dumb to have not grasped what a
threat to our economy the business failure Chump actually is.
How
strong is the rejection of Chump and his tariffs? The Convicted Felon
fled to his Florida home yesterday. Normally, he at least pretends to
do a little work on Friday before flying out of DC. Aaron Parnas (MTN) describes how the market's responded as Chump fled DC:
Wall Street was engulfed in chaos today as a wave of panic selling
erased $2.8 trillion in market value, triggered by escalating fallout
from the Trump administration’s aggressive new tariff regime. Investors
fled equities in droves, hammering every major index and dragging the
U.S. dollar back to pre-election levels.
The Dow Jones Industrial
Average cratered 1,642 points, or 4.7%, marking one of the steepest
one-day point drops in history. The Nasdaq Composite nosedived 1,022
points, or 5.4%, while the S&P 500 shed 4.8%, its worst session
since the early days of the pandemic in March 2020.
Leading the rout was the KBW Bank Index, which tumbled 9.9%, its
steepest plunge since the 2023 regional banking crisis. Financials,
already reeling from rising default risk and narrowing margins, bore the
brunt of the downturn as bond yields collapsed and credit spreads
widened.
Adding to the market stress, the U.S. dollar
plunged in foreign exchange markets, erasing all gains made since
Trump’s re-election victory on November 5, 2024.
Analysts point to growing fears of a global trade war, weakening
investor confidence in the U.S. economy, and expectations of imminent
Federal Reserve intervention as key drivers of the dollar's reversal.
As Kat pointed out, Propaganda Pig Karoline Levitt was deployed to wallow in lies to the media including on CNN:
BOLDUAN:
On taxes, JP Morgan just came out with an analysis in response to this
tariff announcement, saying that these tariffs will be the largest tax
hike on Americans since 1968. A tax hike by $660 billion a year. What is
JP Morgan missing? What are world markets getting wrong? What — what
are — when you see stock futures down, what is everyone missing,
including that local farmer in North Carolina?
LEAVITT:
Well, they’re missing the massive revenue that these tariffs are going
to bring into the United States. Trillions and trillions of dollars in
investment, which leads to more jobs in American communities, higher
wages —
BOLDUAN: But on immediate, Karoline,
I’m sorry to interrupt, but on the immediate. I mean, in the most
immediate, I mean, these farmers, as Thom Tillis says, farmers are one
crop away from bankruptcy. That farmer doesn’t have time to wait for
tariffs to work their way into the system, the benefit of it to work its
way into the system at all.
This is going to
mean higher prices for Americans in the most immediate. That’s why I
asked the question. How much pain on a temporary basis is OK? What’s the
standard that the President is looking at in terms of how much pain
Americans can feel on a temporary basis that he’s OK with?
Propaganda
Pig Karoline Leavitt went on NEWS NATION yesterday to proclaim (lie),
"There’s not going to be any pain for American-owned companies and
American workers, because their jobs are going to come back home, and
again, as for prices, President Trump is working on tax cuts to put more
money back into the pockets of Americans."
Propaganda
Pig should have gone to Florida with Chump instead of going before the
cameras to lie. Before she left her sty to lie yesterday, we'd already included this in the snapshot:
Stephanie Ruhle, on MSNBC, explained
the claim Chump was making for tariffs, "We need to impose these taeriffs
because other companies have been ripping us off for years, taking
advantage of the American people." That's Chump's claim. Reality is,
as Stephanie explained, far different.
Stephanie
Ruhle: The White House says the 10% tariffs are going to apply
everywhere. Well WIRED and AXIOS pointed out that those taxes include
the Heard and McDonald Islands. You can see right here on the massive
list that the administration put out on social media. But here's what
you might now realize. Those islands? They're in Antarctica. They
don't produce any exports. Do you know why? Because there are not any
human beings that even live there. There's no possible way that they
could be taking advantage of us on trade. What we do not know is if the
penguins that live there will retaliate.
Stephanie
and her guest panel addressed the reality of Chump's claims that this
will lead to more things being built in the US. No. For increased
production you need factories and you're looking at three to five years
for those to be constructed. By which time, Chump will be headed out or
already out of the White House. And his tariffs will most likely leave
with him. His erratic behavior on tariffs has not inspired confidence
in the business community. Who's going to work on constructing new
factories for temporary tariffs? He has no credibility on the topic.
Yesterday morning, she Tweeted these basic facts.
And last night on her MSNBC program, she again addressed these realities.
Stephanie
Ruhle: He was never a great business guy. This guy never ran a
successful public company. He never ran a successful, big operation.
He went bankrupt six times. What he was most known for was shirking on
contracts, not standing up to deals. And the whole point of trusted
global trade is trusting is I'm going to make a big investment because I
believe what you've told me, I know these policies -- you will stand up
to them in five or ten years after I've invested billions and billions
of dollars. That's the opposite of how people are feeling now.
[. . .]
The
fact that he has this misunderstanding that all of these jobs are going
to come back here? We haven't heard from one CEO saying I'm going to
build a giant manufacturing plant and, by the way, if they did, it takes
three to five years to build a plant and three to five years from now,
Donald Trump will not be in office. Who knows what the policies will
be? You're not going to find a single corporate board that's going to
sign off on a multi-billion dollar investment when Donald Trump is so
skittish about policy.
Thank goodness for Joe Biden. He turned it around and
the job market got better. So at least we have jobs and --
Oh, wait.
74.
That's
the number of days Chump has been president. And he needed less than
that number of days to start putting people out of jobs in massive
numbers. Thanks to his stupidity, he's created tons of unemployed. Alicia Wallace (CNN) reports:
More
than 275,000 layoffs were announced last month, reaching a level not
seen since the pandemic, according to a new report published Thursday.
The biggest culprit was one particular employer: The federal government.
The
federal government announced plans to axe 216,215 jobs, accounting for
nearly 80% of the 275,240 layoffs announcements made by US employers in
March, according to Challenger Gray & Christmas’ latest report. It’s
the third-highest monthly total behind April 2020 (671,129) and May
2020 (397,016).
The Department of Government
Efficiency has run roughshod on the federal government, slashing
funding, scrapping contracts and laying off droves of federal workers.
“Job
cut announcements were dominated last month by [DOGE] plans to
eliminate positions in the federal government,” Andrew Challenger,
senior vice president for the global outplacement and coaching firm. “It
would have otherwise been a fairly quiet month for layoffs.”
Of
the remaining 59,025 cuts announced outside of the federal government,
the biggest share was in technology and retail, according to the report.
Let's
move over to the issue of the security breach(es) and note this
informed discussion with Jeffrey Goldberg from AMANPOUR & COMPANY
(PBS).
The Convicted Felon has still
refused to hold anyone accountable for the security breaches in his
administration. VOTEVETS offers Tammy Duckworth on why Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, needs to resign or be fired.
No
offense to the senator, but maybe we've been going about this all
wrong. We've pointed out the grave and serious breach and how it put
many -- including our armed forces -- at risk. We've used that evidence
to draw the natural conclusion that accountability has to take place.
That works -- with sane people.
As
we learned yesterday, however, the best approach with Chump is for a
conspiracy mongering nut job to whisper in his ear, "Fire this
person."
The
firings came after Laura Loomer, the far-right activist who once
claimed 9/11 was an inside job, urged President Donald Trump during a
Wednesday meeting to get rid of several members of his National Security
Council staff, including his principal deputy national security
adviser, claiming that they are disloyal. One of the sources said the
firings were a direct result of the meeting with Loomer.
Principal
Deputy National Security Adviser Alex Wong was not among those who had
been dismissed on Wednesday, however, one White House official
speculated to CNN Thursday that Wong could be out as soon as today,
though a final decision remains to be seen.
Wong
was one of the advisers specifically targeted by Loomer, who publicly
questioned his loyalty to Trump and criticized him privately as a “Never
Trumper.”
One of the sources speculated that
National Security Adviser Michael Waltz may have been reluctant to fire
Wong because he has been embroiled in the controversy surrounding the
leak of controversial Signal messages related to military strikes on
Yemen that Waltz and his team have been under fire for initiating.
The
three officials fired include Brian Walsh, a director for intelligence
and a former top staffer for now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the
Senate Intelligence Committee; Thomas Boodry, a senior director for
legislative affairs who previously served as Waltz’s legislative
director in Congress; and David Feith, a senior director overseeing
technology and national security who served in the State Department
during Trump’s first administration.
The Trump administration has fired the director and deputy
director of the National Security Agency, the United States’ powerful
cyber intelligence bureau, according to two sources with direct
knowledge of the situation, members of the Senate and House intelligence
committees and two former officials familiar with the matter.
The dismissal of Gen. Timothy Haugh, who also leads US Cyber
Command — the military’s offensive and defensive cyber unit — is a
major shakeup of the US intelligence community which is navigating significant changes
in the first two months of the Trump administration. Wendy Noble,
Haugh’s deputy at NSA, was also removed, according to the former
officials and lawmakers.
The top Democrats on the Senate and House intelligence
committee, Sen. Mark Warner and Rep. Jim Himes, denounced the firing of
Haugh, who served in the roles since February 2024, in statements on
Thursday night.
So
that's how it works. Over 60% of Americans demand accountability and
Chump blows them off. But an online nut job whispers in his ear and
BOOM! at least five people are immediately fired.
A
recent mishandling of sensitive military discussions has brought
national security concerns to the forefront. Journalist Jeffrey Goldberg
was mistakenly added to a Signal app chat discussing Yemen airstrikes,
drawing widespread scrutiny. The group included Defense Secretary Pete
Hegseth, National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, and CIA Director John
Ratcliffe, all of whom had denied any leak of classified information.
President Donald Trump's niece, Mary Trump, said the mishap provided a
"golden opportunity" for Democrats.
Mary
wrote, "These were the war plans. This is what these breathtakingly
shameless liars claimed never happened. But it all did happen, didn't
it?" She added, "They denied the texts existed; they denied that any
classified information was shared. Then in order to deflect from their
crimes, they attacked Jeffrey Goldberg, who was there at their
invitation, intentional or otherwise. They've been caught red-handed."
Mary
said, "They know, to a person, how serious this is. In a sane world,
they understand that every single traitor in that chat would be fired
and tried under the Espionage Act."
Tommy Christopher (MEDIAITE) notes
that Don Lemon and Jim Acosta pointed out that Pete Hegseth's lack of
qualifications to be Secretary of Defense led to the security breach:
Former
CNN stars Don Lemon and Jim Acosta roasted Trump Defense Secretary Pete
Hegseth with perhaps the worst CNN-related insult imaginable, comparing
him to an infamously failed executive at their former network.
On
Tuesday’s edition of his Substack video podcast The Jim Acosta Show,
Acosta ripped Hegseth by suggesting that, despite all the rhetoric about
“merit” at the DOD, Hegseth was grossly unqualified based on the
Signalgate scandal.
Lemon compared Hegseth to former CNN chief Chris Licht — whose tenure at the network was brief and widely seen as a disaster:
JIM
ACOSTA: You know, Pete Hegseth gets up at his confirmation hearing, you
know, a guy who comes from Fox and he’s going to be announced as the
defense secretary. He’s at his confirmation hearing. He’s going off on
DEI. He’s saying we need merrit back at the Pentagon and he is in this
job for what? Seven weeks?
And he puts war
plans, he puts attack plans for airstrikes on the Houthis on Signal. Way
to go. I’m sorry, that just blows a hole in all of the crap he was
peddling up on Capitol Hill. It just pisses me off to no end.
DON LEMON: Well, it’s confirmation for– that he is not qualified.
Two
things here. When has America ever been merit-based? When you actually
think about it, right? And you think about all the people who are in
positions of power, especially, and all the chances that they’ve had to
screw up this country and they have in many ways.
When
you look at the people who are now in, who have been appointed to
positions and confirmed by the Congress and whoever, they are not
qualified.
You think Pete Hegseth is qualified to be the defense secretary? Of course he’s not qualified to the defense secretary.
You
know, he reminds me of this boss I once had who did not last very long
at the company I was at, and he was extremely overconfident.
And it’s just basically the same sort of personality and attitude that–.
JIM ACOSTA: Mmm-hmmm.
DON
LEMON: –you know, they think that they’re qualified for a job that they
and they’re in way over their head and they don’t even realize it.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Adam Schiff's office:
Letter Follows Reporting that National Security Waltz and His Team Set Up At Least Twenty Chats on Signal and Used Gmail
Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Adam Schiff
(D-Calif.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), and Elissa
Slotkin (D-Mich.), sent a letter
to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles requesting new information to
determine the full scope of and damage to national security by the
repeated use of unclassified messaging applications, like Signal and
Gmail, by senior White House officials and members of President Trump’s
cabinet.
The Senators, all of whom have deep experience in defense,
intelligence, and diplomacy, emphasized the severe national security
consequences of what appears to be an extensive pattern and practice of
using unsecured commercial apps for sensitive national security
communications. Recent reporting indicates that there are at least 20 such chats.
“New reporting indicates that the “Houthi PC small group” chat
established by Mr. Waltz was not an isolated incident. According to
recent reporting, Mr. Waltz and his team “regularly set up chats on
Signal to coordinate official work on issues including Ukraine, China,
Gaza, Middle East policy, Africa and Europe, according to four people
who have been personally added to Signal chats.” This may have included
“at least 20” such chats, which participants in the chat say included
“instances of sensitive information being discussed.” As one alleged
participant in at least some of the group chats commented: “Waltz built
the entire NSC communications process on Signal,”’ wrote the Senators.
“Mr. Waltz’ first message to the group on March 11, 2025, referenced
an earlier meeting in the “Sit Room” (White House Situation Room), a
Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) equipped to handle
the nation’s most sensitive information and the appropriate venue for
communicating and coordinating on matters of national security. None of
the at least 18 participants in the group chat interjected when others
provided clearly classified or operationally sensitive information, or
requested that they be removed at any time during the conversation, even
though Mr. Waltz adjusted the settings at the beginning of the chat to
auto-delete all of group’s messages after a week and then changed the
auto-delete setting to 4 weeks shortly after Defense Secretary Hegseth
provided specific classified details on the impending military strikes,”
the Senators continued.
The Senators demanded specific details on the full scope of national
security-related communications using such commercial messaging
applications and that the White House take all steps to preserve and
recover records, as required by federal law.
As Senators with deep experience in defense, intelligence, and
diplomacy, we are writing to express grave concern and request
information necessary to determine the full scope of and damage caused
by the use of unclassified commercial applications, like Signal and
Gmail, by senior White House officials and members of the President’s
Cabinet to conduct classified and sensitive national security activity
and communications.
In a grave breach of national security, senior White House
officials and members of the President’s Cabinet, including National
Security Advisor Michael Waltz, appear to have engaged in an extensive
pattern and practice of using unsecure commercial messaging applications
to undertake sensitive national security deliberations and discussions,
in violation of federal criminal laws and other requirements designed
to safeguard classified and other sensitive national security
information and preserve presidential and federal records.
New reporting indicates that the “Houthi PC small group” chat
established by Mr. Waltz was not an isolated incident. According to
recent reporting, Mr. Waltz and his team “regularly set up chats on
Signal to coordinate official work on issues including Ukraine, China,
Gaza, Middle East policy, Africa and Europe, according to four people
who have been personally added to Signal chats.” This may have included
“at least 20” such chats, which participants in the chat say included
“instances of sensitive information being discussed.” As one alleged
participant in at least some of the group chats commented: “Waltz built
the entire NSC communications process on Signal.”
This follows earlier reporting that Mr. Waltz “created and hosted
multiple other sensitive national security conversations on Signal with
cabinet members, including separate threads on how to broker peace
between Russia and Ukraine as well as military operations.” Another
recent report indicates that one or more messaging chats initiated by
Mr. Waltz involved Somalia. This same report alleges, moreover, that Mr.
Waltz used his personal email account to conduct government business,
while a senior aide to Mr. Waltz used the same “commercial email service
for highly technical conversations with colleagues at other government
agencies involving sensitive military positions and powerful weapons
systems related to an ongoing conflict […].
These revelations are shocking, but not surprising, in light of
the Signal group chat that Mr. Waltz established ahead of military
attacks in Yemen. When Mr. Waltz initiated the messaging group on March
11, 2025, none of the invited participants, including you, Vice
President J.D. Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of
State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and
Central Intelligence Agency Director John Ratcliffe, expressed surprise,
confusion, or unease at having been added to such a group on a
commercially-available messaging application that is downloaded for use
on unclassified electronic devices.
Mr. Waltz’ first message to the group on March 11, 2025,
referenced an earlier meeting in the “Sit Room” (White House Situation
Room), a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) equipped to
handle the nation’s most sensitive information and the appropriate
venue for communicating and coordinating on matters of national
security. None of the at least 18 participants in the group chat
interjected when others provided clearly classified or operationally
sensitive information, or requested that they be removed at any time
during the conversation, even though Mr. Waltz adjusted the settings at
the beginning of the chat to auto-delete all of group’s messages after a
week and then changed the auto-delete setting to 4 weeks shortly after
Defense Secretary Hegseth provided specific classified details on the
impending military strikes.
The destruction of presidential or federal records is illegal. To
ensure that the Senate can fulfill its constitutionally mandated
oversight duties, and to inform future remedial legislation, we seek and
expect your full cooperation by Thursday, April 10, 2025, with the
initial requests below.
Please take immediate action to (1) preserve all national
security-related communications involving White House officials that
have occurred since January 21, 2025, on commercial messaging platforms,
like Signal or Gmail; (2) prevent the destruction of such records,
including through autodelete settings, and take all necessary and
possible measures to retrieve communications that may have been deleted
on some devices but that may still be visible on others; and (3) issue a
directive to all senior White House officials and Cabinet Members to
cease immediately the use of unclassified, non-government communications
platforms to conduct national security communications.
In addition, as we begin our inquiry, please provide full and
truthful answers to the following, including in classified form, if
necessary:
Please identify and itemize in precise detail all other national
security-related communications that Mr. Waltz or other senior White
House officials initiated or participated in using Signal, Gmail, or
other commercially available platforms, to include messaging groups to
discuss diplomatic or military activity.
Relatedly, please identify all military operations or activities
that Mr. Waltz or other senior White House officials discussed using
Signal, Gmail, or other commercially available platforms, including
whether those discussions referred to, among others:
the U.S. military’s January 30, 2025, airstrike in Syria targeting a senior operative in Hurras al-Din, an al-Qaeda affiliate;
a March 14, 2025, military operation in Iraq that targeted the
Islamic State in Iraq and Syria’s (ISIS) chief of global operations,
which occurred three days after Mr. Waltz established the “Houthi PC
small group” Signal chat on March 11, 2025, and one day before Secretary
of Defense Hegseth disclosed classified information about the military
strikes in Yemen; or
air strikes in Somalia, which U.S. Africa Command has undertaken several times since January 21, 2025.
Please clarify whether any senior White House officials and
Cabinet officials, to include Mr. Waltz, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff,
and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, used their personal
devices for any of the communications described above.
Please clarify whether any senior White House officials and
Cabinet Officials were on foreign travel while participating or included
in any national security-related messaging groups or communications on
Signal or other commercially-available platforms. If so, please explain
which officials were on foreign travel, where they were located, whether
they used Signal or other platforms on their personal or work devices,
and who in the White House authorized the platforms’ use.
Have any relevant communications been irretrievably destroyed,
including through the use of an auto-delete function, such that they
cannot be recovered, reproduced, or copied to government systems, as
required by federal records retention laws and policies? If so, please
clarify which communications can no longer be retrieved with as much
specificity as possible.
###
-----------------------------------------
Dona
here. I'm adding the following to C.I..'s snapshot due to community
members e-mailing asking that it go in. I would also recommend that you
read Marcia's "You really can't trust American Socialists." From Ann, as requested by community members:
Poor
little racist can't catch a break. On that, an e-mailer wanted to
inform me that Amy Goodman tackled Musk's South African links. Did
she? Like most Socialists, she took her sweet damn time, didn't she.
Eoin Higgins, also a Socialist, wrote a book ignoring it that was just
published this year. Ava and C.I. didn't ignore it. And they didn't
ignore it when it came time to review Higgins' bad book -- see "Media: OWNED finds Eoin Higgins owned by bad journalism."
Socialists
don't really care about Black people. We got that when they worked
overtime to pose as Democrats and tell people not to vote for Kamala.
Socialists
give lip service to the notion of reparations; however, they don't
believe in them. If they truly did, they wouldn't have campaigned
against Kamala to put the racist Chump back in the White House. Grasp
that. Think of all the White Socialists you saw trashing Kamala -- Amy
Goodman, Norman Solomon, Rashida Tlaib (Arabs are White but only White
Socialists are racist enough not to know that fact), Jill Stein,
Rashida's ugly sister, etc etc -- they claim to believe in reparations.
But Black people saw the truth in the fall of 2024.
We were enslaved. A debt is supposedly owed as a result. Therefore reparations are needed. That's what they pretend.
But
in the fall of 2024, they could have worked to elect a Black woman --
these people who supposedly feel guilty for their involvement in the
slave trade -- but they instead worked to put a White racist back in the
White House.
We see you. JACOBIN and you other worthless outlets (THE NATION), we see you.
Black
people aren't going to be tricked by you liars ever again. Pretending
to believe in reparations but, at the end of the day, you couldn't even
vote for a Black woman to defeat the twice impeached, racist and
insurrectionist Donald Trump. Bitches, we see you. We've got your
number. And we will overcome you the same we overcame slavery -- by
fighting and truth telling. It's over for you fake asses.