Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Due Process matters (C.I. filling in for Kat)

Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "The Virgin Baby Hogg"  


babyhogg


That's hilarious.  And this is C.I. filling in for Kat.  She's feeling under the weather and I volunteered because I wanted to cover a topic and don't think I can do it in tomorrow's snapshot.  If Ava and I plan what we're going to write about ahead of time, it doesn't work out that way.  We thought our THIRD piece for this week would be about the awful Bill Maher.  And then, late Saturday night, we started working on the immigration issue and realized we needed to cover that so you got "Media: Dangerous rip offs."  However, we also saw the David Hogg nonsense for the threat that it is and we also wrote "Media: Baby Hogg is no leader."  We did not have time for a Bill Maher piece.


I point that out to note that tomorrow's snapshot may end up being the usual type or it may end up being about some news that's breaking.

What I want it to be about is something larger, pulling in the whys of young voters, addressing the realities of the David Hoggers and much more with regards to that.  I think polling is correct but I think it's coming without context.  I'm not referring to Donald Chump's polling.  I'm referring to the Democratic Party.  Gallup alone -- and if I do this tomorrow, I may just focus on Gallup -- is presented by journalists without context and divorced from reality.  I think that's leading to a lot of false claims.

Anyway . . 




El Salvador is only detaining an El Salvadoran man mistakenly deported from Maryland because the country is receiving U.S. payments, U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen said in a letter to the White House on Tuesday.

Van Hollen, a Democrat from Maryland, said his recent meeting with El Salvador's vice president shows President Donald Trump's failure to follow court orders.

In a separate statement, Van Hollen said Salvadoran Vice President Felix Ulloa told him this month that the Central American nation was holding Kilmar Abrego Garcia "solely because the United States is paying the country to do so."

He said, "we have a deal with the U.S. government. They send people. We host them. They pay. And that’s it," the senator wrote in the letter to Trump, citing Ulloa.

Their conversation "clearly demonstrates that the government of El Salvador has no independent legal basis for imprisoning Mr. Abrego Garcia," Van Hollen added. "The only reason for keeping him in prison is that they entered into an agreement with your administration to be paid by the United States.” 

So we could just stop paying them?  Where have I heard that before?

From the April 17th snapshot:



Klaus Marre (WHO WHAT WHERE) reports on Harvard University's refusal to scrape and bow before Chump:

[. . .]
But why are we telling you this? After all, it’s not exactly news when Trump tries to blackmail or coerce someone to get what he wants.

That’s right, and this article isn’t actually about that.

Instead, it is about Trump not coercing someone… and that someone is El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele.

If the US president had any interest in bringing Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the man his administration illegally deported to El Salvador, back to the US, then he could surely compel his counterpart to produce him.

Exactly.  And he could certainly do something as simple as stop payment on the $6 million US tax payers are having to fork over to El Salvador for the 300 people Chump sent there. 

It was never that complicated.  But Chump doesn't want to comply with the court order.  And he's not hiding that fact.  Michael Luciano (MEDIAITE) reports:


President Donald Trump said that although he “could” comply with a U.S. Supreme Court decision instructing him to arrange the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia from a Salvadoran prison, he is declining to do so.

Abrego Garcia is a Salvadoran national who, until last month, was living in Maryland after entering the country illegally. A 2019 court order barred his deportation to El Salvador, but the order did not prevent the government from deporting him to another country.


Here's the exchange:


MORAN: I’m not saying he’s a good guy. It’s about the rule of law. The order from the Supreme Court stands, Sir.

TRUMP: He came into our country illegally.

MORAN. You could get him back. [pointing to Resolute Desk] There’s a phone on this desk.

TRUMP: I could.

MORAN: You could pick it up, and with all the power of the presidency, you could call up the president of El Salvador and say, “Send him back right now.”

TRUMP: And if he were the gentleman you say he is, I would do that.

MORAN: But the court has ordered you to facilitate that– his release.

TRUMP: I’m not the one making this decision. We have lawyers–

MORAN: You’re the president!

TRUMP: –that don’t wanna do this.

MORAN: But the buck stops in this office.

TRUMP: No, no, no, no, no. I follow the law. You want me to follow the law. If I were the president that just wanted to do anything, I’d probably keep him where he is.

MORAN: The Supreme Court says what the law is.

TRUMP: Listen, I was elected to take care of a problem that was– it was a unforced error that was made by a very incompetent man, a man that turned out to be incompetent that you always said was wonderful. A great genius, right? And now you find out, all of the media, they’re saying what a mistake they made.

He thinks he's above the law.  This is a danger sign and this is a very serious moment. We need to be paying attention and we need to be looking to the future, to the mid-terms where we can try to win back the House.  We can't afford to lose it.  And we can't afford to start screwing with nonsense from Baby Hoggs.

These f**k ups already put Chump in the White House and now they're going to be allowed to also doom the mid-terms?  No.

Hell no.


There is too much at stake for too many people.  What's happening to immigrants is outrageous.  We have to be able to stop this and we need control of the House to do that.  Ryan Bort and Nikki McCann Ramirez (ROLLING STONE) point out that the criminal claim has no real support:


"On his knuckles he had MS-13," Trump said of Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was wrongfully deported to a mega-prison in El Salvador. The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that the Trump administration must facilitate his return. Trump and his allies have baselessly tried to cast Abrego Garcia as a terrorist gang member they were justified in expelling from the country without due process (even though the administration itself has admitted in court his deportation was due to an "administrative error").

"He had some tattoos that were interpreted that way," Moran replied.

Abrego Garcia has four symbols tattooed across his knuckles, and the White House has been circulating an image onto which someone Photoshopped - or just superimposed with a basic paint app, really - "MS13," purporting that it's what Abrego Garcia's actual tattoos represent. Trump even posed with a printout of the photo in the Oval Office.

Trump kept insisting the text overlaid across Abrego Garcia's knuckles were the actual tattoos. "Wait a minute. Terry, Terry, Terry. Don't do that. It says ‘MS13.'"

"That was Photoshopped," Moran said.

Trump then started mocking Moran. "That was Photoshopped? Terry, they're giving you the big break of a lifetime. You're doing the interview. I picked you because, frankly, I'd never heard of you, but that's OK," Trump said. "You're not being very nice."

Moran again tried to move to another question, but Trump wasn't having it.

"Terry, do you want me to show you the picture?"

"I saw the picture."

Moran kept trying to move on - even saying "agree to disagree" - but Trump kept insisting: "No, no: He had ‘MS' as clear as you can be, not ‘interpreted.' This is why people no longer believe the news, because it's fake news."

The exchange was emblematic of the Trump administration's unconstitutional deportation agenda, which seems to be predicated on doing anything possible to label immigrants gang members and then banishing them to a Salvadoran prison without due process. When Moran pressed Trump about the apparent illegality of the deportations and the court orders blocking them, the president passed the buck to the Justice Department. "I'll have to ask the lawyers about that," was a typical response.


Chump's a chump.  And we have to stand up to him.  He lies non-stop.  He doesn't hesitate to lie, he feels no guilty about lying.  He has no ethics.   Janna Brancolini (DAILY BEAST) explains:


When Trump first shared the photo on April 19, internet sleuths argued it was misleading because Trump did not make it clear that the image had been digitally altered to include the alleged gang “context.”

The president’s online defenders countered that it was obvious the letters and numbers had been added to illustrate the president’s claims. Trump’s exchange with Moran, however, made it seem like Trump believed the letters and numbers were part of the original tattoo.




Meanwhile, Abrego Garcia remains consigned to an authoritarian miasma where there is no due process, no charged crime, no credible allegation of criminality, no evidence that he was affiliated with the MS-13 gang, and no release date. A Salvadoran national who illegally entered the United States more than decade ago when he was 16 and was living in Maryland when he was detained last month, Abrego Garcia is caught in vice between an anti-immigrant American president who almost never admits error and a Salvadoran president eager to please his new benefactor. Only the U.S. courts offer Abrego Garcia a chance of near-term relief, but they seem confounded by Trump’s defiance.   

The court orders from Judge Xinis, reinforced by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court, always gave President Trump some wiggle room in a nod to two considerations, both legitimate but which pale next to his egregious bad faith. The first was the courts’ concern about over-involving themselves in foreign affairs, such as negotiations to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s release, which are the constitutional province of the executive branch. Second, courts are reluctant to order a party to produce a specific outcome that is not entirely within the party’s control, in this case the open question of the role of the government of El Salvador and its willingness to play ball.




We know about Kilmar.  We even know his name.  There are so many more suffering because of Chump and we don't even know their names.  We have got to take control of the House.  Now is not the time for foolishness from 25 year old David Hogg.  

If you can't grasp that, don't be surprised when those of us of color look at you and see the Karens that you truly are. 


Closing with C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"


Wednesday, April 30, 2025. While Democrats in Congress work to highlight Chump's abuses Gretch the Wretch throws her arms around him and grinds her crotch into his, an apparently blotto drunk Pete Hegseth announces he's over turned a hideous Biden policy that was, in fact, a Chump effort led by, among others, Rubio and Noem, Cry Baby Connolly tries to will his leadership post to a buddy even though it doesn't work that way, and much more.



Is it the lead in the water in Michigan that's turned so many of the state's politicians into clowns over the last year or so? 

Gretchen Whitmer decided to betray the Democratic Party yet again by slobbering over Convicted Felon Donald Chump.









Gretch The Wretch.  We warned you years ago.  


But what to say about yesterday?  Clown make up doesn't a politician make.  I have no idea why so many elected Michigan women feel the need to wear clown make up.  They'll slash that trashy dark red lipstick on for daytime wear as though an overpaid consultant's advised them this make them look like a serious woman?  There are all shades of lipstick and some honestly are inappropriate for women in political office at any time of day. Gretch also has those deformed fake eye brows.  For yesterday's event with Chump, she apparently got on the phone with the Secretary of Homeland Security and asked, "Hey, Kristi, could you help me out with some fashion choices."  How else do you explain that ridiculous cosplay -- especially the ball cap?   Elaine noted last night, "You know the Governor of Maine, Janet Mills, has a spine.  Gretch?  She's got a runner in her spine, someone help her shop for a new one."


Let's work on getting clowns like Gretch out of politics and back to Stepford with the other town wives where she belongs. 


While Gretch spent the day giving Chump a half-and-half, Senator Elizabeth Warren demonstrated Tuesday how politicians can actually use their voices. 



And on the day Gretch the Wretch was throwing her arms around Chump, here was Senator Chris Murphy on the floor of the Senate.



Let's stay with Democrats but move over to the House where cry baby Connolly is the news.  Scott Wong (NBC NEWS) reports:


Rep. Gerry Connolly’s surprise announcement that he plans to soon step down as the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee has set off a scramble to succeed him that could pit the party's old guard against an up-and-coming class of progressives who have aggressively opposed President Donald Trump.


Connolly, 75, said Monday that his esophageal cancer had returned after “grueling treatments” and that he would not seek re-election next year. The Virginia Democrat's decision came just four months after he defeated Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, D-N.Y., for the highly visible committee post.

If Democrats retake the House in next year's midterm elections, the ranking member would be in line to chair the committee, with the power to issue subpoenas to the Trump administration.


A senior Democrat on the panel, Rep. Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, said Tuesday that he is taking over as interim ranking member and will handle day-to-day responsibilities as Connolly focuses on his health. And Lynch said that Connolly has pledged to endorse him for the role once it formally opens up. 


“He told me he’s publicly supporting me,” said Lynch, 70, who has served in the House since 2001. "I worked with him for almost 25 years. So we've traveled together — Iraq, Afghanistan — we've done investigations, we've worked on a whole bunch of stuff together. There's a friendship there."


A few things.  We supported AOC over Connolly for that post.  Some are now saying this proves this or that.  The issue wasn't, and never should have been, Cry Baby's age.  


There was no reason to believe Cry Baby could deliver leadership because in all his time in Congress he never did.  And for the last ten years or so, we called him out as a Cry Baby in hearing after hearing that we reported on here because I'm not a big fan of cry babies.


I cry often.  If someone sacrifices for someone else, goes to the matt for them, that can make me cry.  I cry for our country right now sometimes when I'm speaking to groups of people.  And I power through and keep going.  A cry baby crying for themselves all Connolly offered.  He had no strength and he accomplished in hearing after hearing.


That's why AOC was the better choice.


His age had nothing to do with it then and shouldn't now.


His health?  That's a whole other issue.  We don't have ROE V WADE anymore and that's in part due to RBG.  She put her desire to swear in Hillary Clinton as the first female president of America ahead of the rights of women.  Then Hillary didn't get into the White House.  Because RBG died.  The cancer.  The cancer she knew of and down played.  She should have stepped down when Barack Obama suggested it to her.  But she knew best.  Then she dies with Chump in the Oval Office.


Cry Baby Connolly knew his condition.  (I've had bouts with caner throughout the time of this website. I'm not stupid enough to think I could do chemo and hold public office.  When it's coming back, I may not want to admit it to others but I do sense it.) He never should have gone for the post.


As for his attempt to 'will' it to someone?  It's not his damn seat.  The House Democrats need to get together and immediately vote.  AOC clearly wants it, she should be the front runner.  


Stephen Lynch is not impressive.  He's been a reactor in Congress, not a doer.  


House Dems need to fill this spot immediately.  Lynch shouldn't be allowed to sit in it while others hope the country doesn't pay attention and then get the position slid over to him.


I'm not an AOC stan.  Sunday's comments riled some AOC supporters -- we'll deal with that on Thursday or Friday -- and my statements were accurate.  But AOC sought this position.  AOC has stood with the party -- this isn't a backstabber, for example, who told people not to vote for Kamala in 2024.  She didn't get the post.  And yet she continued to campaign for the party and for what the party believes in as she barnstormed the country.


The position should go to her.  


I wouldn't piss me off on this.  I can remember the last time I got pissed off over a committee position.  It was a highly unqualified idiot.  The idiot's not in Congress anymore.  No, I'm not like the bimbo RFK Junior made his running mate.  (And didn't we shut that bimbo down in real life after her threat to use the money spreading her legs brought it.  Made her social paraih across California and the media's not heard from her since.)  No, when I get pissed, I go looking.  And it didn't take much looking to find that this unqualified hack was also a thief.  Now she and her wigs did get the position that she didn't deserve.  But after that?  She was no longer in Congress.  She was in prison.  


AOC deserves this spot and has earned it.  If the party disagrees, the answer is not to say, "I'm not donating!" or anything like that.  The proper response is to do a deep dive into the reality of Stephen Lynch or whomever gets the post instead of AOC.


Corinne Brown's wasn't the first crooked member of Congress and she hasn't been the last.

And, by the way, there's no reason to wait to build a case against Lynch.  That should start right now.  And you can start with Lynch's 2002 vote for the war on Iraq.  How does that reveal leadership?  What does that say about judgment?  


Again, not an AOC groupie.


She should have been picked over Cry Baby to begin with.  Now that Cry Baby's stepped aside, the post needs to go to her.

Before I forget, Thursday night, MSNBC is doing a townhall live hosted by Stephanie Ruhle.  I went on BLUESKY and can't find anything on it or on Ari's live event on Friday.  Not on their own individual feeds and not even on the MSNBC feed.  News of those specials should be pinned at the top of the feeds.  


Now let's move over to Chump and his little boy Pete Hegseth.  With all the disasters Hegseth continues to create, Mama Chump refuses to take the boy off the tit. Evan Williams (TAG 24 NEWS) reports:



In a new interview with The Atlantic, Trump admitted that "Signalgate" was real and a major mistake, and for the first time pointed the blame at Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

"I think we learned: Maybe don’t use Signal, okay?" Trump told The Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg, who originally broke the story after being added to a Signal chat in plans to bomb Yemen were being shared.

Yet Chump goes on to insist that Hegseth is "safe in his job."


Apparently, Hegseth is finally sleeping through the night.  Those pampers must really be extra absorbent.  Phillip Kolb (2 PARAGRAPHS) reports:


President Donald Trump‘s U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth reported today on X: “This morning, I proudly ENDED the "Women, Peace & Security" (WPS) program inside the @DeptofDefense.”

Hegseth described WPS as “another woke divisive/social justice/Biden initiative that overburdens our commanders and troops - distracting from our core task: WAR-FIGHTING. WPS is a UNITED NATIONS program pushed by feminists and left-wing activists.” Hegseth claimed, “troops HATE it.”
Note: In 2017, President Trump enacted the Women, Peace, and Security Act (P.L. 115-68) which “promotes the meaningful participation of women in all aspects of the conflict continuum, including warfare and stabilization.”

Note: The bill “attracted wide bipartisan support, with then-Senator Marco Rubio, the current Secretary of State, serving as a cosponsor. Mike Waltz, the current U.S. national security advisor, was a founding member of the WPS congressional caucus.” And Rubio has been unwavering in crediting Trump with signing the bill.
Rubio said at the 19th Annual International Women of Courage (IWOC) Awards Ceremony on April 1: “President Trump also signed the Women, Peace, and Security Act, a bill that I was very proud to have been a co-sponsor of when I was in the Senate, and it was the first comprehensive law passed in any country in the world – the first law passed by any country anywhere in the world – focused on protecting women and promoting their participation in society.”


Was he drunk?  Again?  This bill had nothing to do with Joe Biden despite Hegseth's slurred lie.  How blotto is Hegseth by mid-day if he's unable to differentiate between Joe Biden and Donald Chump?  Guess who was a sponsor of the bill in the House?  Kristi Noem who is now Secretary of Homeland Security.   Again, how drunk is Hegseth when he's on the clock?  Nick Wadhams  (BLOOMBERG NEWS) notes another member of Chump's current administration praised the  law back during Chump's first term as president:


The law also received a recent endorsement from Dan Caine, Trump’s chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a retired Air Force lieutenant general. In his April confirmation hearing, Caine said he didn’t think it was linked to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives denounced by Trump and called it “a program that really helped us to understand the full spectrum of challenges that are in front of us.”
Hegseth’s attack on the law highlights yet another move by the current administration to cancel initiatives that Trump had championed during his first term concerning women’s empowerment and diversity. It’s also the latest move in a continuing push by Hegseth — who has come under criticism for a series of missteps — to lean into Trump priorities, such as shutting down the southern border and dismantling DEI initiatives, that are favorites of Trump’s MAGA base.


Meanwhile, Nikki McCann Ramirez (ROLLING STONE) reminds, "Hegseth is the current Secretary of Defense, and while he likes to tout 'WAR-FIGHTING' as his primary focus, his tenure so far has been defined by efforts to purge mentions of women and minorities from the DoD's websites, and accidentally texting sensitive attack plans to journalists." 


Chump's monkey man leaves us all at risk and open to attack.  But it's not just our national defense that Chump's destroying.  No, he's destroying everything.  Gabriela León observes, "The imposition of tariffs imposed by president Donald Trump just this April has made it more expensive for goods to enter the United States. One of the main consequences of artificially inflating import costs is a reduction in the quantity of goods available. On April 24, U.S. pork exports suffered a major setback due to tariffs imposed by China. According to recent USDA data, China cancelled an order for 12,000 metric tons of pork, the largest cancellation since the Covid-19 pandemic disrupted global supply chains in 2020."  Sydney Lake (FORTUNE) explains, "Consumer confidence fell for the fifth straight month on the heels of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff policies, driving up prices and spooking Americans. The Conference Board’s most recent survey for its Consumer Confidence Index, published Tuesday, shows confidence dropped nearly eight points in April to 86. Consumers’ expectations for the future are now at a 13-year low, according to the Conference Board."  Who's to blame?  America knows exactly who's to blame.  The idiot who crashed the economy was Donald Chump.  Ariel Edwards-Levy (CNN) notes, "A 59% majority of the public now says President Donald Trump’s policies have worsened economic conditions in the country, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS, up from 51% in March and on par with the worst numbers Joe Biden saw during his presidency.  Americans remain broadly unhappy with the nation’s economy, the survey finds, and there’s little enthusiasm for the White House’s sweeping new trade policies. With the impact of new tariffs still largely to come, 6 in 10 already say that Trump’s policies have increased the cost of living in their community, with just 12% saying his agenda has helped to bring prices down."



The American public is frustrated, disappointed and increasingly angry at the state of politics 100 days into Donald Trump’s second term in the White House, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS, with neither party positioned to change the mood.

Approval ratings for Republican leaders in Congress are deeply underwater, with Democrats faring even worse as their rank-and-file turn increasingly negative about the party’s leaders. Nearly two-thirds of all Americans say things in the country are going badly today.

The poll also finds a rising tide of fear among Americans looking ahead to the rest of Trump’s second term, with many doubtful that the checks and balances built into the US government are doing enough to limit Trump’s actions in office.

“I’m not pleased. I’m unsure. I’m honestly scared. I think this is the first time I can say that I’m fearful as to what is coming, what has happened and what is coming,” said Lisa Taylor, an independent from Maryland who voted for Trump in 2016 and for Democrat Kamala Harris in 2024 and participated in the poll.

She is one of about 4 in 10 Americans (41%) who say they feel afraid about the remainder of Trump’s second term, up 6 points since February and 12 points since December. 


Turning back to MSNBC, tonight Rachel Maddow completes her 100 day coverage of Chump.   She'll then return to Monday on MSNBC -- Mondays only.  Let's note this fro last night's show.



Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:


Senator Murray: “Let’s face it, billionaires like Elon Musk and Trump already had a “head start” in life, so of course they don’t care if anyone else needs a little help. But this is make or break for everyone else—and I mean everyone, not just for families, not just for parents, but for businesses as well, and for our economy which is powered by our working families.”

ICYMI: Head Start funding lags by nearly $1 billion this year, causing some preschool closures

Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a senior member and former Chairof the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, joined a press conference hosted by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on their announcement of a lawsuit against the Trump administration for seeking to dismantle the Head Start program. Senator Murray spoke about how critical Head Start is in helping kids and families across the country thrive.

Head Start currently serves over 750,000 kids nationwide, and the program has served nearly 40 million children and their families nationwide since its inception in 1965. There are over 17,000 Head Start centers nationwide and these centers are particularly important in serving rural communities with fewer options for care.

Since taking office, President Trump has gutted the offices that keep Head Start centers and child care programs across the country running. In late February, the Trump administration fired scores of staff at the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Office of Head Start and Office of Child Care. Earlier this month, Trump continued to hollow out HHS, including by shuttering half of the regional offices at the Office of Head Start, which are responsible for ensuring high-quality Head Start services are available to families nationwide. The Trump administration has failed to articulate how it will ensure that uninterrupted services are available to families and that appropriate oversight will be carried out despite gutting the very offices charged with these responsibilities.

As data compiled by Senator Murray’s office shows, the Trump administration has failed to get out nearly $1 billion in funding for Head Start programs this year, part of a larger, sweeping funding freeze Trump has ordered since taking office.

Senator Murray’s full remarks, as delivered, are below:

“Well thank you all for being on this call, I really, really do appreciate it. And I just want to say that when I first got into politics to fight for child care and early education programs, I met with a few politicians who really did not get it—and a lot of parents who absolutely did. Well, we made our voices heard, we made a difference in that fight, and now, we have to keep it up!

“I still, constantly, hear from parents about child care and pre-K, and I take their stories back with me here to the Capitol to fight for change. We have made a lot of progress over the years making the case for child care, making historic investments in our families, and changing the conversation.

“But then, a couple of billionaires with no idea about what they are doing came along and decided to take an axe to Head Start. I mean talk about clueless. Talk about careless! Instead of giving our kids a Head Start Trump and Musk want to give billionaires another tax break and give families the cold shoulder.

“We already got a hint of how bad this could get for Washington state—when funding delays forced a Head Start program to the point of closure. 450 kids temporarily lost access to early education programs and support they counted on. And more than 70 employees were out of a job. To say nothing of the hundreds of parents who were about to be forced out of work because they lost pre-K.

“That chaos was from just one provider facing funding delays, if Trump and Musk get their way, if they zero out Head Start completely—the damage would be magnitudes greater.

“Let’s face it, billionaires like Elon Musk and Trump already had a “head start” in life, so of course they don’t care if anyone else needs a little help.

“But this is make or break for everyone else—and I mean everyone, not just for families, not just for parents, but for businesses as well, and for our economy which is powered by our working families.

“Trump and Musk may want to axe Head Start and they have already made clear they will do everything they can to break the program and cause chaos, but they are going to have to go through me—and they are going to have to go through all of you.

“I am going to keep doing what I have done since the very start, getting loud about why programs like Head Start matter for families, talking to other parents, lifting up their voices, and fighting, with all the power I have, for our kids.

“And I’m so glad to be fighting along such amazing advocates and organizations like the ACLU, and the Washington State Association of Head Start and E-CEAP—you don’t just serve our families, you are standing up for them, and we are all really thankful for that.

“So it’s great to be with you on this call—and let’s keep fighting, we’ve got to, thank you.”

###


The following sites updated: