Carole King's TAPESTRY album was released 55 years ago. Jacky Bam Bam (WMMR) notes:
On the anniversary of Tapestry (February 10, 1971), we celebrate an album that did more than define a moment. It reshaped what a singer-songwriter record could be. Released in 1971, Tapestry introduced the world to Carole King not just as a behind-the-scenes hitmaker but as a deeply personal and powerful voice of her own generation.
Before Tapestry, Carole King was already responsible for classics recorded by other artists. What made this album revolutionary was its intimacy. Songs like "It's Too Late," "So Far Away," and "You've Got a Friend" felt like private conversations set to music. Listeners heard vulnerability, honesty, and warmth without any barrier.
One of the coolest facts about Tapestry is its longevity. The album spent fifteen consecutive weeks at number one and remained on the charts for over six years. It went on to win four Grammy Awards, including Album of the Year, making Carole King the first woman to win that honor as a solo artist.
Another remarkable detail is how collaborative the album felt. James Taylor and Joni Mitchell both appear on backing vocals, creating a sense of community that defined the early seventies Laurel Canyon sound. The cover photo itself, featuring King barefoot at home with her cat, became iconic, representing comfort, authenticity, and creative freedom.
Melanie Davis (AMERICAN SONGWRITER) adds:
With no dreaded sophomore slump in sight, King released Tapestry on February 10 to tremendous critical acclaim. The pianist and songwriter set the record for the longest consecutive No. 1 placement by a female solo artist. And Tapestry has a staggering 14x platinum certification from the RIAA. At the 1972 Grammy Awards, King won Album of the Year, Song of the Year, and Record of the Year. Even today, Tapestry remains a beloved staple in King’s catalogue and early 1970s soft-rock as a whole.
And that's all we can not from Melanie Davis because she writes about James Taylor. Paragraph after paragraph. Taylor had no TAPESTRY in his discography. But it's easier for Melanie to write about him -- a story he's been telling all week -- and not about Carole.
If there is a moment when the wave generated by California’s growing ranks of singer-songwriters rises to a natural crest, it comes during the first days of 1971. In A&M’s studio B on the corner of sunset Boulevard and La Brea in Hollywood, Carole King is recording what will shortly become the most successful album ever made by a female artist.
Across the hall in studio C, Joni Mitchell is making Blue. seven blocks away, at Crystal sound on Vine street, James Taylor is putting together his No 1 album, Mud Slide Slim And The Blue Horizon. The friends sing and play on each other’s records, and use many of the same musicians, including guitarist Danny “Kootch” Kortchmar. “We were all hanging out together, everybody knew everybody else,” says Kortchmar. “We all recorded with each other, but it was spontaneous. Joni or James would pop in and it was, ‘Let’s go!’ it was a utopian way of making music.”
Of the three, King appears the least sure of where she is heading. At 28, she is struggling to transition from being one half of the peerless husband-and-wife writing team Goffin & King to becoming a solo artist. she has already made two albums, neither of which have made much impact. Nobody really expects her third attempt to buck the trend. “the tunes were extraordinary, there was no question about that, but the tunes on her previous two albums were extraordinary, too,” says Kortchmar. “We just thought, ‘Yeah, this is Carole. She writes great songs, that’s what she does!’”
“At one point making Tapestry I went into the control room, and Carole said, ‘Do you want to hear the single?’” recalls David Campbell, who played violin and cello on the record. “the song was ‘It’s Too Late’. she said, ‘Well, i hope we can put out a single at least!’ there was no expectation of it doing much. Of course, not long after that, it all blew up. All the forces came together.”
In a time of what King calls “generational and cultural turbulence,” the 12 songs on Tapestry fed a hunger for unaffected intimacy. Deploying “a new kind of personal poetry” and a loose, organic tilt at pop, rock’n’roll and soul, Tapestry is defined by a funky, heartfelt mood of longing.
It was the record that helped explain the baby boomer generation to itself, as their need for personal freedom and self-expression rushed headlong into the responsibilities of marriage, parenthood and citizenship. It continues to cast a powerful spell. In America, it has accumulated a total of 313 weeks in the Billboard Hot 100. In Britain it spent 42 consecutive weeks in the chart immediately following its release, and has since spent a further two years in the top 100. “Every time there’s a new way to access music, Tapestry takes a big bump in sales because everybody wants to continue to listen to it,” says its producer, Lou Adler.
Gina Wurtz (SCREEN RANT) notes:
However, 55 years later, its legacy hasn't faded. In the years since its release, there have been several Tapestry tribute albums, including Tapestry: A Tribute To Carole King, with covers by artists like Aretha Franklin, Rod Stewart, and Celine Dion. In 2003, Tapestry was listed at #36 on Rolling Stone's list of 500 Greatest Albums of All Time.
The same year, Tapestry made it into the Library of Congress's National Recording Registry. The album also acted as inspiration behind the 2014 Tony Award-winning Broadway musical Beautiful, named after the Tapestry single.
In 2021, 50 years after the album's release, Carole King was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame as a solo artist. Her first induction came in 1990 as a songwriter with her partner, Gerry Goffin. At the 2021 ceremony, Taylor Swift inducted King and performed a cover of Tapestry's "Will You Love Me Tomorrow."
Tapestry also had a tremendous impact on the singer-songwriter genre. There's a reason Swift was chosen to induct King into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. The singer-songwriter turned pop superstar walked in King's footsteps to get to where she is today.
Closing with C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"
Tuesday, February 10, 2026. Ghislaine Maxwell makes clear she won't answer questions to Congress without a get-out-of-jail-free card and the world watches as Chump becomes more and more entangled with others who were close to Epstein.
Sunday was the Super Bowl. During the game, many commercials aired. Jennifer Bowers Bahney (MEDIAITE) reports on one:
The survivors of Jeffrey Epstein are making it clear that they’re not moving on from the sex trafficking scandal — despite President Donald Trump saying last week that he’d like Americans to “get on to something else.”
Trump appears in the files some 38,000 times but has not been charged with any wrongdoing. Also appearing in the files are current and former Trump officials Howard Lutnick, Steve Bannon, Elon Musk, John Phelan, Ben Black, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. None of these officials have been charged.
To get their point across, survivors of Epstein and convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell released a public service announcement demanding answers from the Trump Justice Department.
“Survivors
are urging the Justice Department to explain why millions of pages
remain withheld, why survivors’ names and identifying information are
exposed, and to ensure full accountability for the perpetrators,” an
accompanying press release stated.
The PSA was produced by World Without Exploitation, a coalition working to end sexual exploitation.
It opens with the faces of Epstein survivors and the words, “On November 19, 2025, the Epstein Files Transparency Act was signed into law.”
The word “Transparency” was then blacked out, just like the redactions appearing in so many of the files released by the Department of Justice.
“3 million files still have not been released,” the spot continued, as more words were blacked out, and even the survivors’ mouths were covered with black smudges.
Yesterday Ghislaine Maxwell appeared before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee via an internet connection from Club Fed in Bryan, Texas -- a posh prison that Donald Chump moved her to last summer. Sarah Ewall-Wice (DAILY BEAST) reports:
Ghislaine Maxwell is refusing to answer questions from Congress about pedophile Jeffrey Epstein unless she is granted clemency by Donald Trump.
The convicted sex trafficker floated that both Trump and Bill Clinton were innocent on Monday, but she would not share any more than that.
The longtime Epstein accomplice instead invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to self-incriminate during a virtual appearance before the House Oversight Committee.
Her play for Trump’s help comes as the president has been facing accusations about his own relationship with the late disgraced financier.
[. . .]
“Ms. Maxwell is prepared to speak fully and honestly if granted clemency by President Trump. Only she can provide the complete account. Some may not like what they hear, but the truth matters,” Maxwell’s lawyer David Oscar Markus said.
Ahead of Maxwell's appearance, US House Rep Melanie Stansbury anticipated Maxwell would provide nothing. Jaja Agpalo (INQUISITR) noted:
Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) didn’t bother with diplomatic phrasing on Sunday. In an interview on MSNBC’s The Weekend, she accused President Donald Trump of engaging in what is effectively an open-air transaction: purchasing the silence of the most dangerous witness in federal custody to insulate an administration she claims has become an “Epstein island afterparty.”
The chronology is, frankly, hard to overlook. Ghislaine Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence for her role in Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. Yet, the way she is being held has sparked intense scrutiny.
Her sudden transfer to a low-security institution—the sort of ‘Club Fed’ arrangement usually reserved for tax dodgers, not traffickers—stunned the legal community. Stansbury views this ‘highly unusual’ leniency not as a glitch in the Bureau of Prisons, but as a wink from above.
“I think it’s very clear that she is seeking either commutation or a pardon of her sentence,” Stansbury noted. It is a conclusion that is difficult to dismiss when you look at President Donald Trump’s own track record. Donald Trump has previously made “off-handed” comments regarding a potential pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell, dangling the prospect of freedom in plain sight.
Michael Gold (NEW YORK TIMES) notes:
Monday’s deposition took place as the Justice Department also began to make the unredacted versions of its investigative material into Mr. Epstein available to members of Congress. The department finished the release of the files last month.
After viewing the files, Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, criticized the department for not yet sending to Congress a required document explaining the reasons for its redactions.
“I think that the Department of Justice has been in a cover-up mode for many months and has been trying to sweep the entire thing under the rug,” Mr. Raskin told reporters. He also called for more investigation, adding that “there’s no way you run a billion-dollar international child sex trafficking ring with just two people committing crimes.”
After viewing some redacted documents, the two lawmakers who led congressional efforts to pass a resolution that eventually compelled the department to release the Epstein files told reporters that they saw the names and photos of six men who they believe were implicated in Mr. Epstein’s charges on sex trafficking.
Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat of California, and Representative Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, said during a news conference next to a Justice Department building in Washington that those people appear in a photo list of 20 individuals, which resembled “mug shots.” They also criticized the department for redacting those people’s identities in the troves of documents that have been released so far.
“There is no reason in our legislation that allows them to redact the names of those men,” Mr. Massie told reporters.
Mr. Khanna and Mr. Massie added that many documents they viewed on Monday were still redacted, which they said would mean that the files the Justice Department lawyers reviewed for release had already been redacted by either the F.B.I. or a grand jury. The resolution requires that such files to be released.
Howard Lutnick.
Jordain Carney )POLITICO) reports:
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is facing bipartisan calls to resign after he appeared in a recent batch of files linked to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Sen.
But files recently released by the Justice Department suggest he continued his interactions with Epstein, including planning a visit several years later to Epstein’s Caribbean island.
“Lutnick’s lies about his business dealings with a convicted child sex offender, raise serious concerns about his judgement and ethics,” Schiff said. “Lutnick has no business being our Commerce Secretary, and he should resign immediately.”
[. . .]
Schiff is joining a bipartisan chorus of House members who have called in recent days for Lutnick to either resign or be fired — neither of which appears to be on the precipice of happening.
Rep.
THE GUARDIAN's Victoria Bekiempis adds:
Massie’s call for Lutnick’s resignation came a little more than a week after the US justice department released about 3m of its investigative files on Epstein in connection with the transparency law that the Kentucky congressman helped pass.
The disclosure revealed that the commerce secretary discussed visiting Epstein’s island in 2012 – four years after the disgraced financier was sentenced to 13 months in jail for procuring a minor for prostitution.
The Epstein and Lutnick-related emails show correspondence about travel arrangements and political fundraising, among other things. Lutnick and Epstein were neighbors on a particularly tony stretch of Manhattan’s Upper East Side neighborhood.
Epstein’s longtime assistant messaged Lutnick on 20 November 2012 that “Jeffrey Epstein understands you will be down in St Thomas some over the holidays,” referring to a Caribbean island. The assistant continued: “Jeffrey requested I please pass along some phone numbers to you so the two of you can possibly get together.”
Lutnick on 19 December 2012 emailed “Jeff” saying he and several others, including his wife and children, as well as several friends and their kids, were traveling to the Caribbean and on Lutnick’s boat.
Saturday, David McAfee (RAW STORY) noted:
A Trump cabinet member is in hot water on both side of the aisle after it was revealed that he may have lied about his ties to child sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein.
It was reported on Saturday that U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was exposed in the most recent Epstein files release as being in business with Epstein until 2014, contradicting previous claims that he had cut ties with him much earlier.
That led one GOP lawmaker, Kentucky's Thomas Massie, to speak out on Saturday.
"According to legal documents and emails, Epstein and Lutnick did business together and Lutnick vacationed on Epstein’s island, LONG AFTER Lutnick claims they parted ways and after LONG AFTER Epstein was a known sex offender," Massie wrote.
A Democratic congressman then seized on that, sharing Massie's comment and adding, "Secretary Lutnick must resign."
Ted Lieu then added, "He’s despicable for vacationing on Epstein Island with child rapist Jeffrey Epstein. He’s despicable for going on national TV and lying about his relationship with Epstein."
Wow. What a shocker. Someone close to Chump with tighter connections to Epstein than the person ever publicly revealed. Marcia noted the same of "Secretary of the Navy John Phelan and Ben Black, Trump’s personal pick to lead the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation." Rachel noted John Phelan on her MS NOW program last night.
Back to Lutnick, Daniel Ruetenik (CBS NEWS) notes:
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said he had "limited interactions" with Jeffrey Epstein, but documents show they were in business together as recently as 2014.
Lutnick and Epstein each signed on behalf of limited liability companies that agreed on Dec. 28, 2012, to acquire stakes in a now-shuttered advertising technology company called Adfin, documents released among the so-called Epstein files show.
Epstein and Lutnick's signatures appear on neighboring pages in the contract, with Epstein signing for his Southern Trust Company, Inc. and Lutnick for a limited liability company called CVAFH I. The documents list nine shareholders in total.
At THE NEW YORK TIMES, Michael Rothfeld notes:
The records directly contradict Mr. Lutnick’s assertion on a podcast last year that he had been so disgusted by Mr. Epstein during a 2005 visit to his townhouse that Mr. Lutnick had never set foot in a room with Mr. Epstein again.
“So I was never in the room with him socially, for business or even philanthropy,” Mr. Lutnick said in an interview on the podcast, “Pod Force One.” Reached briefly by phone last week, Mr. Lutnick said, “I spent zero time with him.”
[. . .]
The files suggest their relationship was mutual, with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Lutnick both initiating contact at different times. However, the records often lack context and might not document every interaction between the men.
In some cases, emails in the files simply reflect Mr. Epstein’s awareness of interesting tidbits about his neighbor, such as when Mr. Epstein’s lawyer pointed out that a main character in the television show “Billions” seemed to be based in part on Mr. Lutnick, or when his lawyer forwarded him an article about Mr. Lutnick’s lawsuit against a former assistant.
The Times reported last week that Mr. Lutnick and his family had planned a visit for Dec. 23, 2012, to Little St. James, Mr. Epstein’s private island off the coast of St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The next day, Mr. Epstein’s assistant forwarded Mr. Lutnick a message from Mr. Epstein: “Nice seeing you,” suggesting the visit took place.
But by then the two men had already been in steady contact. Mr. Epstein’s schedule for May 1, 2011, shows a 5 p.m. appointment for drinks with Mr. Lutnick, followed by a 6:30 p.m. dinner with the filmmaker Woody Allen and his wife, Soon-Yi Previn. The records suggest the meetings were at Mr. Epstein’s home and that Mr. Lutnick left something behind there.
“The phone was Howard Lutnick’s, it has been collected,” one of Mr. Epstein’s employees emailed him the next day.
Chump is a liar. And he is surrounded by people who, like him, were very close to Epstein. Let's not forget Alex Acosta. He's the one who decided to downgrade the charges against Epstein to begin with. And he went on to become what? Oh, that's right, Chump's Secretary of Labor in Chump's first term as president. From WIKIPEDIA:
In 2005, police in Palm Beach, Florida, began investigating Jeffrey Epstein after a parent reported that Epstein had sexually abused her 14-year-old daughter. In 2008, Acosta approved a controversial plea deal granting immunity from all federal criminal charges to Epstein.
As part of the plea deal, Epstein served 13 months in a minimum-security county jail.[2] He was also allowed to leave the facility up to 12 hours a day.[2]
From 2017 to 2019, Alexander Acosta served as the 27th United States secretary of labor. President Donald Trump nominated Acosta to be Labor Secretary on February 16, 2017, and he was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on April 27, 2017.
After Epstein's arrest in July 2019 on sex trafficking charges, Acosta faced criticism for his role in the 2008 non-prosecution agreement. He resigned from the Trump administration on July 19 and was replaced by Eugene Scalia.
As Ben notes on MEIDASTOUCH NEWS NETWORK today, Chump has repeatedly lied to the public about his relationships with Epstein and Maxwell and we now know that in 2006, he was calling them both evil when he ran to the police on them.
An important segment today on MS NOW's MORNING JOE.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
The following sites updated: